SCHZ vs VGIT

SCHZ tracks the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index and reported 10,721 securities on its fact sheet dated Sep 30, 2026. The SEC filing for June 30, 2026 lists 12,328 lines, a different count that includes cash-like holdings.

VGIT tracks the Bloomberg U.S. Treasury 3-10 Year Bond Index: U.S. Treasury securities with three to ten years remaining. It held 102 bonds on Sep 30, 2026, all of them Treasuries. The Treasury fund owns a small, concentrated list, while the broad fund owns thousands of bonds across several sectors.

Holdings counts are not directly comparable: some are a count of bonds, others a count of lines in a holdings file, which can include cash and futures.

The largest bond line in SCHZ is 0.39% of the fund (Jun 30, 2026) and the largest in VGIT is 1.92% (Aug 31, 2026). Every one of the twenty lines below is a U.S. Treasury note, which is typical of funds that are mostly government debt. The top ten total 3.74% of SCHZ and 18.51% of VGIT. VGIT owns only 102 bonds, so each position is large and its top ten make up 18.5% of the fund.

The two lists are dated differently on purpose, because each issuer publishes holdings on its own schedule: SCHZ Jun 30, 2026 (SEC Form N-PORT, filed Aug 25, 2026); VGIT Aug 31, 2026 (SEC Form N-PORT, filed Oct 29, 2026 (fund-level, all share classes)). SCHZ’s largest single line is a money market fund (1.56%), left out of the list above.

99 individual bonds appear in both funds, out of 12,327 distinct bonds in SCHZ and 103 in VGIT. Adding up the smaller of the two weights for every shared bond gives a portfolio overlap of 19.2%. The shared bonds are 19% of SCHZ but 95% of VGIT, because VGIT is a short list of Treasuries that SCHZ also owns among its many other holdings.

That is a floor, not a ceiling, for three reasons: the files are dated Jun 30, 2026 and Aug 31, 2026, so bonds that matured or were bought in between show as unshared; some weight carries no bond identifier (100% of SCHZ and 99% of VGIT is matched to an identifier), mostly mortgage securities and cash; and the funds may identify the same mortgage pools differently.

Shared bonds are ranked by the smaller of the two weights. SCHZ: Jun 30, 2026. VGIT: Aug 31, 2026. Weights are percent of each fund’s net assets.

Each issuer uses its own labels (SCHZ: Security type (Schwab label), Sep 30, 2026; VGIT: Distribution by issuer (Vanguard label), Sep 30, 2026). This page groups them into common categories: “Treasury and agency” adds Treasury, agency and government lines; corporate adds industrial, financial and utility bonds; “Other and cash” holds the remainder.

SCHZ: Maturity (Schwab label), Sep 30, 2026. VGIT: Distribution by effective maturity (Vanguard label), Sep 30, 2026. Where an issuer reports narrower bands, they are added together to match the common bands shown.

79% of SCHZ and 100% of VGIT sits between one and ten years, and 9.6% of SCHZ and 0.0% of VGIT runs past 20 years. Average effective maturity is 8.2 years for SCHZ and 5.6 years for VGIT. The gap in the one-to-ten-year share is large enough to show up in how the funds react to rate changes.

Duration estimates how much a bond fund’s price moves when yields change. A duration of 5.7 years means a rise of one percentage point in yields would lower the price by about 5.7%, and a fall of one point would raise it by about the same.

SCHZ reports average duration of 5.7 years (Sep 30, 2026); VGIT reports average duration of 4.8 years (Sep 30, 2026). That is a difference of 0.90 years, which is large enough to matter: the fund with the higher duration will move more when yields change.

Estimate: price change ≈ −duration × change in yield, applied to $10,000. It ignores interest income, convexity, spread changes and trading costs, so real results will differ. Neither fund’s fact sheet used here lists convexity or an option-adjusted spread.

The 30-day SEC yield is the standard way to compare bond funds because every fund calculates it the same way, after expenses. SCHZ showed 5.00% and VGIT showed 4.90%, a gap of 0.10 points.

The two figures are dated Sep 30, 2026 and Nov 5, 2026, and market yields can change in between, so the comparison is approximate. Yield to maturity is shown with its date where the issuer publishes it. Trailing 12-month yield is a record of what was paid, not a forecast: 4.27% for SCHZ and 3.98% for VGIT.

Monthly payouts per share, newest first

Third-party payout history (StockAnalysis, Nov 9, 2026), the 12 most recent payouts listed, which include two in December 2025 and none dated January 2026. Per-share amounts differ because the funds have different share prices (about $23 against $58), so compare yields, not dollars per share. Bond fund payouts change from month to month with the income the fund earns.

Average annual returns to September 30, 2026

Calendar-year returns

Net asset value (NAV) total returns, with distributions reinvested, from Schwab fact sheet (Sep 30, 2026) for SCHZ and Vanguard fact sheet (Sep 30, 2026) and fund page for VGIT. Past performance does not guarantee future results. The funds launched in different years (SCHZ Jul 14, 2011, VGIT Nov 19, 2009), so since-inception figures (1.85% and 1.99%) cover different periods and are not compared here.

The fees are identical, so cost does not separate these funds. Both funds are large ($10.82B and $41.51B), and large funds usually trade with tight spreads. VGIT’s assets above are the ETF share class only; Vanguard reports $47.8B (Sep 30, 2026) across all share classes of the fund. Neither fund’s fee is likely to be the largest cost of owning it: the choice of how much to hold in bonds, and for how long, matters far more than a few hundredths of a percent.

Interest from bond funds is generally taxed as ordinary income rather than at the lower rates that apply to qualified dividends, and the monthly distributions of these funds are mostly interest. For that reason many investors hold taxable bond funds in tax-advantaged accounts, such as retirement accounts, when they have the choice.

Some interest from U.S. Treasuries can be exempt from state income tax; how much of each fund’s income qualifies is reported by the issuer after year-end and varies by fund and year. VGIT holds only Treasuries, so more of its income may qualify for the state-tax exemption than the income of a fund that also holds corporate and mortgage bonds; the issuer reports the exact share after year-end.

Canadian and other non-U.S. investors face their own rules, including currency conversion and withholding considerations, and should check them before buying a U.S.-listed fund.

Every figure on this page, with its source, date and evidence grade. Open the issuer documents before relying on any number.

Third-party sources

StockAnalysis, SCHZ · StockAnalysis, VGIT.

Methodology and limits

• Issuer figures are shown with their own dates. Where the two funds report on different dates the page says so and does not mix them silently.
• Sector and maturity overlap are this page’s sums of the smaller weight in each common category, and are approximate because issuers use different labels.
• Holdings overlap matches bonds by CUSIP or ISIN between the two holdings files named above; bonds without an identifier cannot be matched.
• Figures that were unavailable are marked as such, and nothing was filled from memory or from another fund.
• Rate-sensitivity figures are estimates from reported duration only.

SCHZ vs VGIT, which is better?

Neither is better in general, because they do different jobs. SCHZ holds the U.S. investment-grade bond market through the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate index, while VGIT holds only U.S. Treasury notes and bonds with 3 to 10 years left to run. The right one depends on the role bonds play in a portfolio, the investor’s tolerance for interest-rate and credit risk, and the account used.

SCHZ vs VGIT, what is the difference in fees?

There is none. Both list an expense ratio of 0.03%, which is $3 a year on $10,000.

SCHZ vs VGIT, which has the higher yield?

SCHZ showed a 30-day SEC yield of 5.00% on Sep 30, 2026 and VGIT showed 4.90% on Nov 5, 2026. The gap is 0.10 points; the dates differ, so the comparison is approximate.

SCHZ vs VGIT, how much do they fall if rates rise?

By duration, about 5.7% for SCHZ and 4.8% for VGIT for each one-point rise in yields, before counting the interest each fund earns. This is an estimate, not a forecast.

SCHZ vs VGIT, do they hold the same bonds?

Partly. The files compared here show 99 bonds in both funds, a portfolio overlap of 19%. SCHZ holds 10,721 bonds and VGIT holds 102. The sector overlap on this page is about 47%.

VGIT vs SCHZ, does the order change the comparison?

No. VGIT vs SCHZ and SCHZ vs VGIT describe the same pair of funds, and every figure on this page applies either way. The order only decides which fund is listed first.

SCHZ vs VGIT, can I own both?

You can. The two funds hold different exposures, with an overlap of 19%, so owning both gives a different mix from owning either alone.

SCHZ vs VGIT, are they suitable for Canadian investors?

Both are U.S.-listed and trade in U.S. dollars, so Canadians face currency conversion costs and should check how interest income is taxed in their account type before buying.

Pathways, not rankings or recommendations.