INVEST & COMPOUND · ETF RESEARCHDividend ETFs · Comparison · Reviewed November 9, 2026
Invest & Compound · ETF ResearchData: Vanguard and provider pages, Sep 30 to Nov 6, 2026

VIG vs VYM

Dividend growth vs high yield, both from Vanguard

Two Vanguard dividend ETFs at the same 0.04% fee and built on opposite ideas. VIG holds about 333 stocks with at least ten straight years of dividend growth and leans on technology. VYM holds 593 stocks with above-average forecast yields and pays the higher trailing yield. VYM led over 1, 3 and 5 years to Sep 30, 2026; VIG led over 10.

VIGVanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF
Technology26.7%Financials21.0%Health care18.6%Industrials11.4%Consumer staples9.2%
Holds333 companies
Ten largest positions~35%
Expense ratio0.04%
Net assets$115.8B
PaysQuarterly
Launched2006
VYMVanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Financials20.4%Technology14.3%Industrials13.6%Health care13.4%Energy10.1%
Holds593 companies
Ten largest positions~26%
Expense ratio0.04%
Net assets$83.3B
PaysQuarterly
Launched2006
!
VIG is 27% technology and 21% financials in 333 stocks. VYM is 20% financials, 14% technology and 14% industrials in 593 stocks, with more energy and utilities.
0.00%Fee gap: both cost $4 per $10,000
5 of 10Shared top-ten stocks, both lists dated Sep 30
34.5% / 26.2%Ten largest positions, VIG / VYM
3 – 1Calendar years 2022 to 2025: VYM led three
VIG: Vanguard fact sheet and fund page (Sep 30 and Nov 5, 2026). VYM: Vanguard fact sheet (Sep 30, 2026) and ETF Central (Nov 2–3, 2026). Educational, not advice.
Quick answerUpdated November 9, 2026

VIG vs VYM, the short answer

VIG and VYM are two large Vanguard dividend ETFs, with about $115.8B and $83.3B in assets, and both charge 0.04%. VYM pays the higher yield (2.24% trailing 12-month against about 1.49% for VIG) and led VIG over 1, 3 and 5 years to Sep 30, 2026. VIG led over 10 years, requires ten straight years of dividend growth, holds 333 stocks against 593, and leans harder on technology. Neither is better for everyone: yield, breadth and a cheaper valuation (VYM) against dividend growth, quality metrics and a technology tilt (VIG).

Income todayVYM pays the higher yield.2.24% vs about 1.49% trailing
CostIdentical, and both are low.$4 per $10,000 each
BreadthVYM holds far more stocks and a flatter top ten.593 vs 333 holdings
Track recordVYM led over 1, 3 and 5 years; VIG over 10.Matched to Sep 30, 2026
Figures from the issuer pages named in the data room, with dates. Educational, not advice.
OverlapTop-ten lists · weights as of the dates shown

VIG vs VYM overlap, if you own both

In VIG’s top ten
In VYM’s top ten
81%
sector overlap (this page) · 5 shared top-ten stocks
AVGO · JPM · XOM · JNJ · ABBV
Biggest gaps: technology is 26.7% of VIG but 14.3% of VYM; health care is 18.6% of VIG but 13.4% of VYM; energy is 10.1% of VYM but 3.6% of VIG

The twist

Sector overlap (this page)
81%
Top-ten weight, VIG
34.5%
Top-ten weight, VYM
26.2%

These two funds share more than their sponsor. Five of the same stocks sit in both top-ten lists, and the sector mixes overlap by about 81%, because both buy large U.S. dividend payers. The five shared names are 16.0% of VIG and 18.2% of VYM. Holding both adds some breadth by company but little by sector.

Both top-ten lists and both sector tables are from Vanguard, Sep 30, 2026, so the dates match. Sector overlap is this page’s sum of the smaller sector weight in each fund. A fund-level weight overlap and a daily-move correlation were not captured for this pair. Not advice.
GoalsCharacteristics, not recommendations

VIG vs VYM, one goal, which fund?

FundYour goalWhyThe evidence
VIGA bigger technology and growth tiltIncludes Microsoft, Apple, BroadcomTechnology 26.7% vs 14.3% for VYM (both Sep 30)
VIGA dividend-growth screenTen straight years of rising dividendsVIG’s index requires the record; VYM selects on forecast yield
VIGStronger 10-year returnLed over 10 years12.86% vs 11.28% annualized NAV, Sep 30, 2026
VIGHigher quality metricsHigher return on equity, larger companiesROE 29.5% vs 19.3%; median market cap $337.6B vs $171.0B
VYMHigher current incomeHigher yield todayTrailing 12-month 2.24% (Nov 2) vs about 1.49% (Sep 28); VYM’s SEC yield was not captured
VYMStronger recent returnsLed over 1, 3 and 5 years1-year 12.72% vs 9.77%; 5-year 11.63% vs 10.72% (NAV, Sep 30)
VYMA much wider list and cheaper valuation593 stocks, P/E 19.5x593 vs 333 holdings; ten largest 26.2% vs 34.5%; P/B 3.0x vs 5.0x
NEITHERThe same costBoth charge 0.04%$4 a year per $10,000 for each: fee does not separate them
Fund figures from the issuers named in the data room. Examples, not recommendations.
HoldingsFive largest · full top-ten tables in the data room

VIG vs VYM, where the money goes

VIG · Vanguard, Sep 30

VYM · Vanguard, Sep 30

Concentration: VIG’s ten largest total 34.5%; VYM’s total 26.2%. Broadcom alone is 6.9% of VYM and 4.3% of VIG
Both funds: Vanguard fact sheets, ten largest holdings as of Sep 30, 2026. Weights move with prices. Not advice.
ReturnsCalendar years and matched Sep 30, 2026

VIG vs VYM returns, different periods, different winners

VIG: Yahoo Finance calendar-year total return. VYM: TotalRealReturns (dividends reinvested, nominal, as of Nov 6, 2026). Two sources, so small differences are possible. VYM led 2022, 2024 and 2025; VIG led 2023. A 2021 figure for VIG was not captured.

+12.72%VYM 1-year NAV return to Sep 30, 2026 (Vanguard)
+9.77%VIG 1-year NAV return to Sep 30, 2026 (Vanguard)
12.86% vs 11.28%10-year annualized NAV return, VIG vs VYM, to Sep 30, 2026
VYM led over 1 year (12.72% vs 9.77%), 3 years (17.67% vs 16.51%) and 5 years (11.63% vs 10.72%); VIG led over 10 years. Rankings flip with the window
Matched Sep 30, 2026: VYM led over 1, 3 and 5 years, VIG over 10. Calendar years 2022 to 2025: VYM led three. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
FeesAs stated by each issuer

VIG vs VYM, what each fund costs a year

$4VIG, per $10,000 · 0.04%
$4VYM, per $10,000 · 0.04%
The fees are identical, so the calculator below shows the same cost for both
VIG and VYM: Vanguard expense ratio per the most recent prospectus (0.04% each). Illustrative arithmetic, not a forecast.

The data room

Every figure behind the VIG vs VYM cards above, with its source, date and evidence grade. Open the issuer documents before relying on any number.

VIG vs VYM key facts

Evidence grade: Issuer issuer page · Mixed issuer plus provider · 3rd party
MetricVIGVYMGrade and source

Portfolio characteristics

MetricVIGVYMGrade and source

VIG’s $115.8B is the ETF-share figure on Vanguard’s fund page in early November; Vanguard also reports fund-level assets across share classes. VYM’s $83.3B is ETF Central’s net-asset figure for Nov 2; Vanguard’s fact sheet shows $78.9B for the ETF share class at Sep 30 and $95.8B for the whole fund. VYM’s SEC yield, spread, premium or discount, shares outstanding and NAV were not captured, and VIG’s NAV, premium or discount and beta were not captured. Both market capitalizations are Vanguard medians at Sep 30.

VIG vs VYM holdings and top ten

Click a tile · VIG: Vanguard, Sep 30 · VYM: Vanguard, Sep 30
Consumer staplesHealth careEnergyTechnologyFinancialsConsumer discretionary
Select a tile
Tile area is proportional to weight.
VIG
#HoldingWeight
VYM
#HoldingWeight

Top ten sums: VIG 34.5% · VYM 26.2%. Vanguard rounds to one decimal. Five stocks appear in both top-ten lists. Weights change.

VIG vs VYM sector exposure

VIG: Sep 30, 2026 · VYM: Sep 30, 2026
VIG
VYM
Implication. VIG is led by technology (26.7%), financials (21.0%) and health care (18.6%), with 3.6% in energy and no communication or real estate. VYM is led by financials (20.4%), technology (14.3%), industrials (13.6%) and health care (13.4%), holds 10.1% in energy and 5.4% in utilities, and holds no real estate.

The sector mirror

VIGVYM
Implication. VIG is heavier in technology (26.7% vs 14.3%) and health care (18.6% vs 13.4%). VYM is heavier in energy (10.1% vs 3.6%), utilities, communication, consumer discretionary and industrials. Financials are nearly equal (21.0% vs 20.4%).

Same funds, different lenses

Implication. Grouped as defensive (staples, health care, utilities), VIG is 30.5% and VYM 27.3%; VIG holds 26.7% in technology and communication against 18.3% for VYM. Groupings are this page’s judgment on issuer sectors, not a provider category.

Company size

Both funds, Vanguard Sep 30: VIG median market capitalization $337.6B, VYM $171.0B. VIG is the larger-company fund by this measure, and VYM adds many smaller names across its 593 holdings. Both are overwhelmingly large-company funds.

What you actually own

Dividend growth screenVIG’s index needs at least ten straight years of dividend growth and drops the top yield quarter.VIG 333 holdings
High forecast yieldVYM’s index holds U.S. stocks with above-average forecast dividend yields and excludes real estate investment trusts.VYM 593 holdings
WeightingBoth weight by market size; VIG applies a 4% cap per stock, VYM does not cap Broadcom, which is 6.9%.Top ten 34.5% vs 26.2%
RegionBoth buy U.S. companies; Vanguard reports about 0.8% non-U.S. stock in VIG and 94.4% in the U.S. for VYM.Mostly U.S. · both

VIG vs VYM performance

Both funds from issuers, matched at Sep 30, 2026

Average annual: Vanguard, Sep 30, 2026. “Since inception” starts in different years (VIG April 2006, VYM November 2006), so the columns are close in time but should still be read with care. Vanguard’s fact sheets do not show after-tax returns. Calendar years: VIG from Yahoo Finance, VYM from TotalRealReturns. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Latest returns. Year to date: VIG +12.49% (Vanguard NAV, to Nov 5, 2026); VYM +12.81% (TotalRealReturns, to Nov 6) and +10.01% (Vanguard NAV, to Sep 30). The dates and sources differ, so do not rank on them.

Growth of a hypothetical $10,000 · NAV total return to Sep 30, 2026

Both funds derived from the issuers’ annualized NAV returns (compounded). Distributions reinvested, fund expenses deducted. Illustration, not a forecast.

VIG vs VYM dividends and dividend growth

Latest eight payouts each
VIG ex-datePayable$ / shareVYM ex-datePayable$ / share
$3.56VIG 2025 total
$3.50VYM 2025 total
+2.7%VIG last four vs prior four
+4.5%VYM last four vs prior four

Quarterly payouts per share, newest first

–VIG: last four payouts vs prior four
–VYM: last four payouts vs prior four
$3.646VIG last four payouts
$3.676VYM last four payouts
QuarterVIG vs same quarter a year earlierVYM vs same quarter a year earlier

Single payouts are noisy; a four-quarter comparison is steadier. Computed from the distribution tables above.

Yield definitions
MeasureVIGVYM
30-day SEC yield1.43% (Oct 31); 1.60% (Sep 30)Not captured
Trailing 12-monthAbout 1.49% (ETFdb, Sep 28)2.24% (ETF Central, Nov 2); 2.31% (StockAnalysis)
Last four payouts$3.646 per share$3.676 per share
FrequencyQuarterlyQuarterly
Capital gains paidNot capturedNot captured

The two funds pay similar dollars per share, but VIG’s share price is higher than VYM’s (an undated range of $205 to $246 against $138 to $167), so VYM’s yield is higher; compare yields, not dollars. VIG’s payouts vary from quarter to quarter, so judge growth over a year. VIG’s four payouts through Sep 2026 total $3.646 against $3.549 for the prior four (+2.7%); VYM’s total $3.676 against $3.518 (+4.5%). See what is dividend yield and yield vs total return.

VIG vs VYM concentration and overlap

Ten largest positions · shared holdings
5Shared top-ten stocks
81%Sector overlap · this page
22.1% / 18.2%Top five, VIG / VYM
6.9%Broadcom, VYM’s largest position

Rank by rank, the ten largest positions of each fund, both Vanguard, Sep 30. Top five: VIG 22.1%, VYM 18.2%. Top ten: VIG 34.5%, VYM 26.2%.

Implication. Five shared names carry about a sixth of VIG and nearly a fifth of VYM, so owning both repeats a real slice of the same companies. VIG’s top five weigh more (22.1% vs 18.2%) because of Microsoft, Apple and Broadcom, while VYM spreads weight across 593 stocks. If you already own a broad index fund, most of either fund is already in it.

VIG vs VYM trading and liquidity

Issuer and provider pages · Nov 2–6, 2026
$115.8B / $83.3BNet assets, VIG (Nov 5) / VYM (Nov 2)
0.01%VIG median bid/ask spread, Nov 5
~467MVIG shares outstanding (undated)
NYSE ArcaBoth funds are listed on NYSE Arca

Both trade on NYSE Arca. A spread of 0.01% is about $10 between the buy and sell price on $100,000. VYM’s spread, premium or discount and share count were not captured for this page, so check them on Vanguard’s fund page before placing a large trade. Use limit orders for large trades and avoid the first and last minutes of the session. See creation, redemption and trading for how NAV, premiums and spreads arise.

VIG vs VYM fees in dollars

As stated by each issuer
BalanceVIG (0.04%)VYM (0.04%)Gap per year
$10,000$4$4$0
$50,000$20$20$0
$100,000$40$40$0

Expense ratio is taken from fund assets, not billed. It excludes the bid/ask spread, any premium or discount to NAV, brokerage commissions and taxes. VIG’s ratio has been listed as low as 0.04% and as high as 0.06% in older Vanguard documents; the 0.04% figure is from the current prospectus, as is VYM’s.

VIG vs VYM, how each fund picks its stocks

Index approach, in plain language

VIG · S&P U.S. Dividend Growers

VIG tracks the S&P U.S. Dividend Growers Index, which holds U.S. companies with at least ten consecutive years of increasing dividends and, per provider descriptions, excludes the highest-yielding quarter of eligible stocks. It is market-cap weighted with a 4% cap on individual stocks and reconstitutes annually. Vanguard replicates it fully, so the fund holds 333 stocks, and turnover was only 8.2% in its latest fiscal year.

VYM · FTSE High Dividend Yield

VYM tracks the FTSE High Dividend Yield Index, which holds U.S. companies with above-average forecast dividend yields and, per provider descriptions, excludes real estate investment trusts. It is market-cap weighted, so the largest companies carry the most weight, and Vanguard reports 593 holdings with turnover of only 11.3% in its latest fiscal year. Exact eligibility rules, caps and rebalance dates sit in the index methodology.

Exact eligibility rules, caps and rebalance dates sit in each prospectus and index methodology; read them before relying on this summary.

VIG vs VYM, why yield and returns differ

Sector mix explains much of the gap

VYM’s higher yield comes from how the two indexes are built. VIG requires at least ten straight years of dividend growth and drops the highest-yielding quarter of eligible stocks, which concentrates it in lower-yielding growers such as Microsoft, Apple and Broadcom. VYM holds every U.S. stock with an above-average forecast yield, which gives 593 holdings, more energy and utilities, and a lower valuation (P/E 19.5x against 24.4x).

The return pattern flips with the window. VYM led over 1 year (12.72% vs 9.77%), 3 years (17.67% vs 16.51%) and 5 years (11.63% vs 10.72%), while VIG led over 10 years (12.86% vs 11.28%). VIG’s technology weight helped over the decade and VYM’s mix held up better in 2022, when VIG fell 9.81% and VYM 0.45%. Sector tilt is the simplest explanation, not proof: leadership can reverse, and a higher yield is not a promise of higher total return. Read yield vs total return before choosing on yield alone.

How to decide between VIG and VYM

A step-by-step framework

Start with what separates them. Cost does not: both charge 0.04%, or $4 a year on $10,000. Yield favors VYM: 2.24% trailing against about 1.49%, which on a $100,000 balance implies roughly $2,240 a year against $1,490 at those yields before taxes, if yields held (they change, and the dates differ). Breadth favors VYM: 593 stocks against 333 and a flatter top ten. Dividend-growth screening and a technology tilt favor VIG.

Then check what you already own. Five top-ten stocks are shared and sector weights overlap by about 81%, so holding both adds less than it looks. If you already hold a broad U.S. fund such as VOO or VTI, either fund adds a dividend tilt on top of what you own.

  • Step 1 · Goal: dividend growth and a quality tilt (VIG) or higher income and a wide, cheaper-valued list (VYM).
  • Step 2 · Overlap: compare each fund with your existing index funds using the Diversification Calculator.
  • Step 3 · Sectors: accept a technology-heavy mix (VIG) or more financials, industrials and energy (VYM).
  • Step 4 · Cost: identical, so it should not decide this one.
  • Step 5 · Account: consider how dividends are taxed in your account type.

Most investors would pick one rather than both. For other ways to compare dividend funds, VIG vs DGRO and SCHD vs VIG show how VIG sits against other dividend funds. Size the position against your whole portfolio.

VIG vs VYM for Canadian investors

Currency, withholding tax and account type

VIG and VYM are U.S.-listed and trade in U.S. dollars, so buying them from a Canadian account usually involves converting Canadian dollars, which adds a cost on both entry and exit. Currency moves also change your return in Canadian dollars even if the funds are flat in U.S. dollars.

U.S. dividends paid to Canadian residents can be subject to U.S. withholding tax, generally 15% under the Canada-U.S. tax treaty. Registered accounts are treated differently: an RRSP is generally exempt from that withholding on U.S. dividends, while a TFSA is not. In a taxable account the withheld amount may be claimable through the foreign tax credit. Because VYM yields more, the withholding in dollar terms is larger on a given balance.

Canadians holding U.S.-listed assets above a modest threshold may also face U.S. estate tax exposure, which treaty relief can reduce. This is general education, not tax advice; confirm the rules for your situation with a cross-border tax professional.

Risks of VIG and VYM

What can go wrong

Shared risks

  • Both hold U.S. stocks and can fall with the market; VIG’s worst decline of the last decade was about 31.7% (BestETF) and VYM’s deepest three-year drawdown was 14.4% (ETF Central, to Nov 2). The two measures cover different periods and are not matched.
  • Dividends can be cut, and no dividend is guaranteed.
  • Rising interest rates can pressure dividend stocks.
  • Both hold large U.S. companies almost entirely, so neither diversifies across countries.

Fund-specific risks

  • VIG: 47.7% in technology and financials; Microsoft, Apple and Broadcom total 14.1%; P/E 24.4x and P/B 5.0x.
  • VIG: no communication or real estate exposure and little energy (3.6%).
  • VYM: 20.4% in financials and 6.9% in a single stock, Broadcom; top holdings follow market size, not dividends paid.
  • Both: index changes can alter holdings and sector weights between reviews.

VIG vs VYM taxes and account placement

General education, not tax advice

Both funds invest in U.S. stocks and pay quarterly. Both turn over little: VIG’s turnover was 8.2% and VYM’s 11.3% in their latest fiscal years, which usually limits taxable distributions. Capital gains distribution history was not captured for either fund. U.S. taxpayers may see some dividends taxed at lower qualified rates if holding-period rules are met.

Vanguard’s fact sheets do not show after-tax returns for either fund. For Canadian account types and withholding tax, see the Canadian section above. Confirm the rules for your account with a tax professional, and read how to build an ETF portfolio.

Other ETFs people compare

For context, not recommendations

Investors comparing VIG and VYM often also look at Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity (SCHD), iShares Core Dividend Growth (DGRO), iShares Core High Dividend (HDV) and ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats (NOBL). See SCHD vs VIG, SCHD vs VYM, VIG vs DGRO and SCHD vs VTI. Broad funds such as VTI and VOO already hold many of the same companies, so check overlap before adding a dividend fund to a core portfolio. See every dividend fund side by side on the Dividend ETFs page.

VIG vs VYM drawdown arithmetic

What a decline means in dollars
−10%–
−20%–
−31.7% (VIG, 10-year worst)–
−14.4% (VYM, 3-year max)–

Recovery gain = decline ÷ (1 − decline). VIG: BestETF 10-year worst decline. VYM: ETF Central three-year maximum drawdown to Nov 2, 2026. The periods differ, so the two are not comparable. See the Position Size Calculator.

Tools to compare VIG vs VYM

Static weights from this page
Cost of the fee gap · compounded difference
VIG ending–
VYM ending–
Difference–

Ignores taxes, spreads and holdings differences. ETF Fee Calculator.

Where would your money land?
VIG largest (4.9%)–
VIG top ten (34.5%)–
VIG tech + financials (47.7%)–
VYM largest (6.9%)–
VYM top ten (26.2%)–
VYM financials + tech (34.7%)–

Check shared exposure with the Diversification Calculator.

VIG vs VYM, which fits which job

Characteristics, not recommendations

VIG may suit investors who want…

A low-cost U.S. dividend growth fund with a technology tilt and a strong 10-year record, accepting a lower yield than VYM.

Strengths

  • Same low fee as VYM: 0.04%
  • Ten straight years of dividend growth required
  • Led VYM over 10 years: 12.86% vs 11.28%
  • Higher return on equity (29.5% vs 19.3%)

Watch points

  • Lower yield: about 1.49% trailing against 2.24%
  • Technology 26.7%; ten largest 34.5%
  • Behind VYM over 1, 3 and 5 years at Sep 30
  • Fell further in 2022: −9.81% against −0.45%

VYM may suit investors who want…

A wide, low-cost U.S. high-yield fund with a cheaper valuation and more energy, accepting less dividend-growth screening.

Strengths

  • Same low fee as VIG: 0.04%
  • Higher trailing yield: 2.24% against about 1.49%
  • 593 holdings; ten largest 26.2%
  • Led VIG over 1, 3 and 5 years, and in three of four calendar years

Watch points

  • Behind VIG over 10 years at Sep 30
  • Financials 20.4% and Broadcom 6.9%
  • No dividend-growth requirement
  • SEC yield and spread not captured here
Neither is a complete portfolio. Both are U.S. dividend equity. Start from a core portfolio and size a dividend fund inside your allocation; many of these stocks also sit in broad funds such as VTI and VOO. This is general education, not tax or investment advice.

VIG vs VYM investor scenarios

Characteristics that fit, not recommendations
Dividend growth focusWants a ten-year dividend-growth screen and accepts a bigger technology weight and a lower yield.VIG 333 holdings
Income and breadthWants the higher yield and a wide list, and accepts a cyclical mix without a growth screen.VYM 2.24% trailing yield
Already owns a broad indexHolds VTI or VOO. Either fund adds a dividend tilt; check overlap first.Check overlap first
Canadian investorHolds U.S.-listed ETFs in USD and weighs withholding tax by account type: TFSA, RRSP or taxable.Confirm with a tax pro

VIG vs VYM key terms

Plain-language definitions
Dividend growth screenA rule requiring years of rising dividends before a stock can enter an index.VIG: 10+ years
Forecast dividend yieldA yield based on expected dividends. VYM’s index selects stocks whose forecast yield is above average.VYM
Trailing yieldDividends paid over the past 12 months divided by the price. It looks back and can differ from the SEC yield.VIG ~1.49% · VYM 2.24%
TurnoverHow much of a fund is bought and sold in a year. Higher turnover can mean more taxable distributions.VIG 8.2% · VYM 11.3%

VIG vs VYM, frequently asked questions

Answers use the figures and dates shown above

Is VIG or VYM better?

Neither is better for everyone. VYM pays a higher yield (2.24% trailing against about 1.49% for VIG) and led over 1, 3 and 5 years to Sep 30, 2026. VIG led over 10 years, requires ten straight years of dividend growth and holds a more technology-heavy list. Both charge 0.04%, so the choice turns on income and breadth against dividend growth and quality.

Which pays the higher dividend yield, VIG or VYM?

VYM. Its trailing 12-month yield was 2.24% (ETF Central, Nov 2, 2026) against about 1.49% for VIG (ETFdb, Sep 28). VIG’s 30-day SEC yield was 1.43% on Oct 31 and 1.60% on Sep 30; VYM’s SEC yield was not captured. The dates differ, so treat the gap as approximate.

What are the expense ratios of VIG and VYM?

Both charge 0.04% per Vanguard’s current prospectus, or $4 a year per $10,000. Older Vanguard documents showed higher figures for VIG, so check the latest prospectus.

How much do VIG and VYM overlap?

Five stocks appear in both top-ten lists: Broadcom, JPMorgan Chase, Exxon Mobil, Johnson & Johnson and AbbVie. By this page’s own sector arithmetic, the two funds overlap about 81% by sector weight. A fund-level weight overlap was not captured.

What index does each ETF track?

VIG tracks the S&P U.S. Dividend Growers Index. VYM tracks the FTSE High Dividend Yield Index. Both are passive, quarterly-paying U.S. dividend funds listed on NYSE Arca.

What are the top holdings of VIG and VYM?

VIG’s largest positions on Sep 30, 2026 were Microsoft (4.9%), Apple (4.9%), Broadcom (4.3%), Eli Lilly (4.1%) and JPMorgan Chase (3.9%). VYM’s largest on the same date were Broadcom (6.9%), JPMorgan Chase (3.8%), Exxon Mobil (2.8%), Johnson & Johnson (2.7%) and AbbVie (2.0%).

Which has performed better, VIG or VYM?

It depends on the window. To Sep 30, 2026 VYM led over 1 year (12.72% vs 9.77%), 3 years (17.67% vs 16.51%) and 5 years (11.63% vs 10.72%), and VIG led over 10 years (12.86% vs 11.28%), annualized on NAV. VYM led in 2022, 2024 and 2025 and VIG in 2023. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which grew its dividend faster?

VYM’s last four payouts total $3.676 per share, about 4.5% above the prior four. VIG’s last four total $3.646, about 2.7% above the prior four. Short windows are noisy and past growth does not guarantee future growth.

How do VIG and VYM differ by sector?

VIG (Sep 30, 2026) was 26.7% technology, 21.0% financials and 18.6% health care, with 3.6% in energy. VYM (Sep 30, 2026) was 20.4% financials, 14.3% technology, 13.6% industrials and 13.4% health care, with 10.1% in energy and 5.4% in utilities.

Can I own both VIG and VYM?

You can. They share five top-ten stocks and overlap by about 81% by sector weight, so owning both adds less diversification than it seems. Check your combined overlap with a diversification calculator and size positions against your whole portfolio.

Which is less volatile, VIG or VYM?

VIG’s three-year standard deviation was 10.33% against 11.11% for VYM at Sep 30, 2026. Maximum drawdowns were reported for different periods: about 31.7% for VIG’s worst decline in a decade (BestETF) and 14.4% for VYM over three years (ETF Central), so do not compare those two figures.

Are VIG and VYM suitable for Canadian investors?

Both are U.S.-listed and trade in U.S. dollars, so Canadians face currency conversion costs and may face U.S. withholding tax on dividends. Treatment differs across TFSA, RRSP and taxable accounts. This is general education, not tax advice; confirm with a tax professional.

VIG vs VYM documents and sources

Open the issuer documents before relying on any figure

Third-party sources

StockAnalysis · TotalRealReturns · ETF Central · Yahoo Finance · BestETF.

Methodology and limits

  • VIG figures come from Vanguard’s fact sheet and investment profile (Sep 30, 2026) and Vanguard’s fund page (Nov 5, 2026). VYM figures come from Vanguard’s fact sheet (Sep 30, 2026) and ETF Central (Nov 2–3, 2026).
  • Top-ten holdings and sector weights for both funds are Vanguard, Sep 30, 2026, so the dates match.
  • Sector overlap of 81% is this page’s sum of the smaller sector weight in each fund. Fund-level weight overlap, daily-move correlation, VYM SEC yield, spread, premium or discount, shares outstanding, VIG beta and capital gains history were not captured.
  • Calendar-year returns for VIG (Yahoo Finance) and VYM (TotalRealReturns) come from two sources; VIG 2021 was not captured, so the table starts in 2022.
  • Growth of $10,000 is derived from each issuer’s annualized NAV returns; dollar values are approximate.
  • Drawdowns: VIG is BestETF’s 10-year worst decline; VYM is ETF Central’s three-year maximum drawdown. They cover different periods and are third party.
  • Index rules summarize provider descriptions; confirm eligibility rules, caps and rebalance dates in each prospectus.

Educational research, not personalized investment, tax or legal advice, and not a recommendation to buy or sell any fund. Investing involves risk, including loss of principal. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Calculators are hypothetical illustrations. Fund data are provided as published by the sources named and may differ from current figures.