INVEST & COMPOUND · ETF RESEARCHDividend ETFs · Comparison · Reviewed November 9, 2026
Invest & Compound · ETF ResearchData: Schwab, Vanguard and provider pages, Sep 30 to Nov 6, 2026

SCHD vs VYM

Dividend quality vs broad high yield

Two large U.S. dividend ETFs built for different jobs. SCHD holds about 102 stocks chosen on dividend quality and pays the higher trailing yield. VYM holds 593 stocks with above-average forecast yields, costs less, and led SCHD in each calendar year from 2022 to 2025.

SCHDSchwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
Consumer staples20.0%Health care19.2%Energy15.4%Technology12.2%Industrials11.3%
Holds102 companies
Ten largest positions~41%
Expense ratio0.06%
Net assets$119.9B
PaysQuarterly
Launched2011
VYMVanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Financials20.4%Technology14.3%Industrials13.6%Health care13.4%Energy10.1%
Holds593 companies
Ten largest positions~26%
Expense ratio0.04%
Net assets$83.3B
PaysQuarterly
Launched2006
!
SCHD is 55% staples, health care and energy in about 102 stocks. VYM is 20% financials, 14% technology and 14% industrials, spread over 593 stocks.
0.02%Fee gap: VYM costs $2 less per $10,000
1 of 10Shared top-ten stocks: only Chevron is in both lists
41% / 26%Ten largest positions, SCHD / VYM
4 – 0Calendar years 2022 to 2025: VYM led all four
SCHD: Schwab Asset Management (Nov 5–6 and Sep 30, 2026). VYM: Vanguard fact sheet (Sep 30, 2026) and ETF Central (Nov 2–3, 2026). Educational, not advice.
Quick answerUpdated November 9, 2026

SCHD vs VYM, the short answer

SCHD and VYM are two of the largest U.S. dividend ETFs, with about $119.9B and $83.3B in assets. SCHD pays the higher yield (3.24% trailing 12-month against 2.24% for VYM) and led over the latest year and over 10 years to Sep 30, 2026. VYM costs slightly less (0.04% against 0.06%), holds 593 stocks against about 102, turns over far less, and led SCHD in every calendar year from 2022 to 2025. Neither is better for everyone: yield, a quality screen and a defensive tilt (SCHD) against breadth, cost and a cyclical mix of financials, technology and industrials (VYM).

Income todaySCHD pays the higher yield.3.24% vs 2.24% trailing yield
CostVYM is cheaper, and both are low.$4 vs $6 per $10,000
BreadthVYM holds far more stocks and a flatter top ten.593 vs 102 holdings
Track recordSCHD led over 1 and 10 years; VYM over 3 and 5.Matched to Sep 30, 2026
Figures from the issuer pages named in the data room, with dates. Educational, not advice.
OverlapTop-ten lists · weights as of the dates shown

SCHD vs VYM overlap, if you own both

In SCHD’s top ten
In VYM’s top ten
75%
sector overlap (this page) · 1 shared top-ten stock
CVX
Biggest gaps: staples are 20.0% of SCHD but 8.5% of VYM; energy is 15.4% of SCHD but 10.1% of VYM; financials are 20.4% of VYM but 9.1% of SCHD

The twist

Sector overlap (this page)
75%
Top-ten weight, SCHD
41%
Top-ten weight, VYM
26%

These two funds look alike on the surface and differ underneath. Only one stock, Chevron, sits in both top-ten lists, yet the sector mixes still overlap by about 75%, because both buy large U.S. dividend payers. Holding both adds some diversification by company but much less by sector.

Left: Schwab, Nov 5, 2026. Right: Vanguard, Sep 30, 2026 (dates differ). Sector overlap is this page’s sum of the smaller sector weight in each fund (both Sep 30, 2026). A fund-level weight overlap and a daily-move correlation were not captured for this pair. Not advice.
GoalsCharacteristics, not recommendations

SCHD vs VYM, one goal, which fund?

FundYour goalWhyThe evidence
SCHDHigher current incomeHigher yield todayTrailing 12-month yield 3.24% (Sep 30) vs 2.24% (Nov 2); VYM’s 30-day SEC yield was not captured
SCHDStronger one-year and ten-year returnsLed over 1 and 10 years1-year 23.36% vs 12.72%; 10-year 12.44% vs 11.28% (NAV, Sep 30, 2026)
SCHDA defensive, quality-screened mixStaples, health care and energy lead54.6% in staples, health care and energy vs 32.0% for VYM
VYMThe lowest ongoing costCheaper to hold0.04% against 0.06%: $4 vs $6 a year per $10,000
VYMA much broader list593 stocks, flatter top ten593 vs about 102 holdings; ten largest 26.2% vs 41.2%
VYMA stronger calendar-year recordLed all four years, 2022 to 20252025: 15.43% vs 4.34%; 2022: −0.45% vs −3.26% (TotalRealReturns, Nov 6)
VYMLower turnover and volatilityQuieter underneathTurnover 11.3% vs 40.61%; 3-year standard deviation 11.11% vs 13.75% (Sep 30)
NEITHERA complete portfolioBoth are U.S. dividend equitySize a dividend fund inside a broader allocation
Fund figures from the issuers named in the data room. Examples, not recommendations.
HoldingsFive largest · full top-ten tables in the data room

SCHD vs VYM, where the money goes

SCHD · Schwab, Nov 5

VYM · Vanguard, Sep 30

Concentration: SCHD’s ten largest total 41.2%; VYM’s total 26.2%. Broadcom alone is 6.9% of VYM
SCHD: Schwab, ten largest holdings as of Nov 5, 2026. VYM: Vanguard fact sheet, Sep 30, 2026. Weights move with prices. Not advice.
ReturnsCalendar years and matched Sep 30, 2026

SCHD vs VYM returns, different periods, different winners

Both funds from TotalRealReturns (dividends reinvested, nominal), as of Nov 6, 2026. VYM led every full calendar year from 2022 to 2025; SCHD led the 2026 year to date, +31.37% against +12.81%. A single source is used for both funds, so the years are matched.

+23.36%SCHD 1-year NAV return to Sep 30, 2026 (Schwab)
+12.72%VYM 1-year NAV return to Sep 30, 2026 (Vanguard)
12.44% vs 11.28%10-year annualized NAV return, SCHD vs VYM, to Sep 30, 2026
VYM led over 3 years (17.67% vs 15.44%) and 5 years (11.63% vs 9.48%); SCHD led over 1 and 10 years. Rankings flip with the window
Matched Sep 30, 2026: SCHD led over 1 and 10 years, VYM over 3 and 5. Calendar years 2022 to 2025: VYM led all four. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
FeesAs stated by each issuer

SCHD vs VYM, what each fund costs a year

$6SCHD, per $10,000 · 0.06%
$4VYM, per $10,000 · 0.04%
Here VYM is cheaper. The gap is $2 a year per $10,000: try the calculator below
SCHD: Schwab expense ratio (0.06%). VYM: Vanguard expense ratio per the most recent prospectus (0.04%). Illustrative arithmetic, not a forecast.

The data room

Every figure behind the SCHD vs VYM cards above, with its source, date and evidence grade. Open the issuer documents before relying on any number.

SCHD vs VYM key facts

Evidence grade: Issuer issuer page · Mixed issuer plus provider · 3rd party
MetricSCHDVYMGrade and source

Portfolio characteristics

MetricSCHDVYMGrade and source

VYM’s SEC yield, spread, premium or discount, shares outstanding and NAV were not captured for this page. VYM’s $83.3B is ETF Central’s net-asset figure for Nov 2; Vanguard’s fact sheet shows $78.9B for the ETF share class at Sep 30 and $95.8B for the whole fund across share classes. SCHD’s market capitalization is a weighted average; VYM’s is a median, so the two are not directly comparable.

SCHD vs VYM holdings and top ten

Click a tile · SCHD: Schwab, Nov 5 · VYM: Vanguard, Sep 30
Consumer staplesHealth careEnergyTechnologyFinancialsConsumer discretionary
Select a tile
Tile area is proportional to weight.
SCHD
#HoldingWeight
VYM
#HoldingWeight

Top ten sums: SCHD 41.17% · VYM 26.2%. Vanguard rounds to one decimal. One stock, Chevron, appears in both top-ten lists. Weights change.

SCHD vs VYM sector exposure

SCHD: Sep 30, 2026 · VYM: Sep 30, 2026
SCHD
VYM
Implication. SCHD is led by consumer staples (20.0%), health care (19.2%) and energy (15.4%), with no materials or real estate. VYM is led by financials (20.4%), technology (14.3%), industrials (13.6%) and health care (13.4%), holds 5.4% in utilities and 3.0% in materials, and holds no real estate.

The sector mirror

SCHDVYM
Implication. SCHD is heavier in consumer staples (20.0% vs 8.5%), health care (19.2% vs 13.4%) and energy (15.4% vs 10.1%). VYM is heavier in financials (20.4% vs 9.1%), technology (14.3% vs 12.2%), industrials, utilities and materials.

Same funds, different lenses

Implication. Grouped as defensive (staples, health care, utilities), SCHD is 39.3% and VYM 27.3%; VYM holds 18.3% in technology and communication against 18.2% for SCHD, and 20.4% in financials against 9.1%. Groupings are this page’s judgment on issuer sectors, not a provider category.

Company size

SCHD (Schwab): weighted average market capitalization $174.29B. VYM (Vanguard, Sep 30): median market capitalization $171.0B. Different measures, so treat them as the same order of magnitude: both are overwhelmingly large-company funds, and VYM adds many smaller names across its 593 holdings.

What you actually own

Dividend quality screenSCHD’s index selects about 100 stocks on dividend sustainability and fundamental strength, after excluding the highest yielders.SCHD 102 holdings
High forecast yieldVYM’s index holds U.S. stocks with above-average forecast dividend yields and excludes real estate investment trusts.VYM 593 holdings
WeightingBoth weight by market size; SCHD applies a per-stock cap, VYM does not cap Broadcom, which is 6.9%.Top ten 41.2% vs 26.2%
RegionBoth buy U.S. companies; Vanguard shows 94.4% in the U.S. for VYM (ETF Central, Sep 30).Mostly U.S. · both

SCHD vs VYM performance

Both funds from issuers, matched at Sep 30, 2026

Average annual: Schwab and Vanguard, Sep 30, 2026. “Since inception” starts in different years (SCHD 2011, VYM 2006), so do not compare those two columns. SCHD after-tax returns are Schwab’s highest historical federal rates; Vanguard’s fact sheet does not show them. Calendar years: TotalRealReturns, both funds. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Latest returns. Year to date to Nov 6, 2026 (TotalRealReturns, dividends reinvested): SCHD +31.37%, VYM +12.81%. At Sep 30, Vanguard reported VYM’s NAV year-to-date return as +10.01%.

Growth of a hypothetical $10,000 · NAV total return to Sep 30, 2026

Both funds derived from the issuers’ annualized NAV returns (compounded). Distributions reinvested, fund expenses deducted. Illustration, not a forecast.

SCHD vs VYM dividends and dividend growth

Latest eight payouts each
SCHD ex-datePayable$ / shareVYM ex-datePayable$ / share
$1.05SCHD 2025 total
$3.50VYM 2025 total
+2.0%SCHD last four vs prior four
+4.5%VYM last four vs prior four

Quarterly payouts per share, newest first

–SCHD: last four payouts vs prior four
–VYM: last four payouts vs prior four
$1.054SCHD last four payouts
$3.676VYM last four payouts
QuarterSCHD vs same quarter a year earlierVYM vs same quarter a year earlier

Single payouts are noisy; a four-quarter comparison is steadier. Computed from the distribution tables above.

Yield definitions
MeasureSCHDVYM
30-day SEC yield3.12% (Nov 5)Not captured
Trailing 12-month3.24% (Sep 30)2.24% (ETF Central, Nov 2); 2.31% (StockAnalysis)
Last four payouts$1.054 per share$3.676 per share
FrequencyQuarterlyQuarterly
Capital gains paidNone in the latest eightNot captured

VYM pays more dollars per share because its share price is roughly four and a half times SCHD’s; compare yields, not dollars. SCHD’s four payouts through Sep 2026 total $1.054 against $1.034 for the prior four (+2.0%); VYM’s total $3.676 against $3.518 (+4.5%). Two yield measures are shown for VYM because its SEC yield was not captured. See what is dividend yield and yield vs total return.

SCHD vs VYM concentration and overlap

Ten largest positions · shared holdings
1Shared top-ten stock · Chevron
75%Sector overlap · this page
21.4% / 18.2%Top five, SCHD / VYM
6.9%Broadcom, VYM’s largest position

Rank by rank, the ten largest positions of each fund. SCHD: Schwab (Nov 5). VYM: Vanguard (Sep 30). Top five: SCHD 21.4%, VYM 18.2%. Top ten: SCHD 41.2%, VYM 26.2%.

Implication. Little overlap at the top does not mean little overlap overall: both funds hold large U.S. dividend payers, and sector weights overlap by about 75%. VYM’s top five weigh less (18.2% vs 21.4%) but Broadcom is by itself 6.9%, while SCHD’s weights are spread evenly across about ten names near 4% each. If you already own a broad index fund, most of either fund is already in it.

SCHD vs VYM trading and liquidity

Issuer and provider pages · Nov 2–6, 2026
$119.9B / $83.3BNet assets, SCHD / VYM (Nov 6 / Nov 2)
0.03%SCHD median bid/ask spread, Oct 7 to Nov 6
+0.05%SCHD premium to NAV, Nov 6
NYSE ArcaBoth funds are listed on NYSE Arca

Both trade on NYSE Arca. A spread of 0.03% is about $30 between the buy and sell price on $100,000. VYM’s spread, premium or discount and share count were not captured for this page, so check them on Vanguard’s fund page before placing a large trade. Use limit orders for large trades and avoid the first and last minutes of the session. See creation, redemption and trading for how NAV, premiums and spreads arise.

SCHD vs VYM fees in dollars

As stated by each issuer
BalanceSCHD (0.06%)VYM (0.04%)Gap per year
$10,000$6$4$2
$50,000$30$20$10
$100,000$60$40$20

Expense ratio is taken from fund assets, not billed. It excludes the bid/ask spread, any premium or discount to NAV, brokerage commissions and taxes. VYM’s 0.04% is from Vanguard’s most recent prospectus as shown on its fact sheet; SCHD’s 0.06% is from Schwab.

SCHD vs VYM, how each fund picks its stocks

Index approach, in plain language

SCHD · Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100

SCHD tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. Schwab describes it as focused on the quality and sustainability of dividends, selecting stocks for fundamental strength relative to peers using financial ratios. It is market-cap weighted with a per-stock cap and excludes the highest-yielding names. The result is about 100 large U.S. companies reviewed annually. Turnover was 40.61% at Sep 30, 2026.

VYM · FTSE High Dividend Yield

VYM tracks the FTSE High Dividend Yield Index, which holds U.S. companies with above-average forecast dividend yields and, per provider descriptions, excludes real estate investment trusts. It is market-cap weighted, so the largest companies carry the most weight, and Vanguard reports 593 holdings with turnover of only 11.3% in its latest fiscal year. Exact eligibility rules, caps and rebalance dates sit in the index methodology.

Exact eligibility rules, caps and rebalance dates sit in each prospectus and index methodology; read them before relying on this summary.

SCHD vs VYM, why yield and returns differ

Sector mix explains much of the gap

SCHD’s higher yield comes from how the two indexes are built. SCHD’s index keeps about 100 stocks selected for dividend quality and sustainability, which concentrates it in mature staples, health care and energy companies that pay a lot. VYM’s index holds every U.S. stock with an above-average forecast yield, which gives 593 holdings and a lot of financials, technology and industrials with lower yields.

The return pattern flips with the window. SCHD led over the latest year (23.36% vs 12.72%) and over 10 years (12.44% vs 11.28%), while VYM led over 3 years (17.67% vs 15.44%) and 5 years (11.63% vs 9.48%) and in each calendar year from 2022 to 2025. Sector tilt is the simplest explanation, not proof: leadership can reverse, and a higher yield is not a promise of higher total return. Read yield vs total return before choosing on yield alone.

How to decide between SCHD and VYM

A step-by-step framework

Start with what separates them. Yield favors SCHD: 3.24% trailing against 2.24%, which on a $100,000 balance implies roughly $3,240 a year against $2,240 at those yields before taxes, if yields held (they change). Cost favors VYM by 0.02 points, or $2 a year on $10,000. Breadth favors VYM: 593 stocks against about 102, and a flatter top ten.

Then check what you already own. Only one top-ten stock is shared, but sector weights overlap by about 75%, so holding both adds less than it looks. If you already hold a broad U.S. fund such as VOO or VTI, either fund adds a dividend tilt on top of what you own.

  • Step 1 · Goal: income today and a quality screen (SCHD) or a broad, low-cost high-yield list (VYM).
  • Step 2 · Overlap: compare each fund with your existing index funds using the Diversification Calculator.
  • Step 3 · Sectors: accept a defensive, energy-heavy mix (SCHD) or more financials, technology and industrials (VYM).
  • Step 4 · Cost: VYM saves $2 a year per $10,000, which is small next to the yield gap.
  • Step 5 · Account: consider how dividends are taxed in your account type.

Most investors would pick one rather than both. If you want a fund built on dividend growth instead, SCHD vs VIG and SCHD vs DGRO show how a dividend growth fund differs. Size the position against your whole portfolio.

SCHD vs VYM for Canadian investors

Currency, withholding tax and account type

SCHD and VYM are U.S.-listed and trade in U.S. dollars, so buying them from a Canadian account usually involves converting Canadian dollars, which adds a cost on both entry and exit. Currency moves also change your return in Canadian dollars even if the funds are flat in U.S. dollars.

U.S. dividends paid to Canadian residents can be subject to U.S. withholding tax, generally 15% under the Canada-U.S. tax treaty. Registered accounts are treated differently: an RRSP is generally exempt from that withholding on U.S. dividends, while a TFSA is not. In a taxable account the withheld amount may be claimable through the foreign tax credit. Because SCHD yields more, the withholding in dollar terms is larger on a given balance.

Canadians holding U.S.-listed assets above a modest threshold may also face U.S. estate tax exposure, which treaty relief can reduce. This is general education, not tax advice; confirm the rules for your situation with a cross-border tax professional.

Risks of SCHD and VYM

What can go wrong

Shared risks

  • Both hold U.S. stocks and can fall with the market; SCHD’s worst decline of the last decade was about 33.4% (BestETF) and VYM’s deepest three-year drawdown was 14.4% (ETF Central, to Nov 2). The two measures cover different periods and are not matched.
  • Dividends can be cut, and no dividend is guaranteed.
  • Rising interest rates can pressure dividend stocks.
  • Both hold large U.S. companies almost entirely, so neither diversifies across countries.

Fund-specific risks

  • SCHD: 54.6% in staples, health care and energy; top ten about 41%; turnover was 40.61% at Sep 30.
  • SCHD: energy is 15.4% of assets, so oil and gas prices matter more than for most funds.
  • VYM: 20.4% in financials and 6.9% in a single stock, Broadcom; top holdings follow market size, not dividends paid.
  • Both: index changes can alter holdings and sector weights between reviews.

SCHD vs VYM taxes and account placement

General education, not tax advice

Both funds invest in U.S. stocks and pay quarterly. VYM’s turnover is low (11.3% in its latest fiscal year), which usually limits taxable distributions; SCHD’s turnover was 40.61% at Sep 30, 2026. SCHD paid no capital gains in the latest eight distributions; VYM’s capital gains history was not captured. U.S. taxpayers may see some dividends taxed at lower qualified rates if holding-period rules are met.

Schwab’s after-tax return for SCHD to Sep 30, 2026 was 21.86% over one year before selling shares and 13.95% after selling; Vanguard’s fact sheet does not show an equivalent for VYM. For Canadian account types and withholding tax, see the Canadian section above. Confirm the rules for your account with a tax professional, and read how to build an ETF portfolio.

Other ETFs people compare

For context, not recommendations

Investors comparing SCHD and VYM often also look at Vanguard Dividend Appreciation (VIG), iShares Core Dividend Growth (DGRO), iShares Core High Dividend (HDV) and ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats (NOBL). See SCHD vs VIG, SCHD vs DGRO, SCHD vs HDV, SCHD vs NOBL and SCHD vs VTI. Broad funds such as VTI and VOO already hold many of the same companies, so check overlap before adding a dividend fund to a core portfolio. See every dividend fund side by side on the Dividend ETFs page.

SCHD vs VYM drawdown arithmetic

What a decline means in dollars
−10%–
−20%–
−33.4% (SCHD, 10-year worst)–
−14.4% (VYM, 3-year max)–

Recovery gain = decline ÷ (1 − decline). SCHD: BestETF 10-year worst decline. VYM: ETF Central three-year maximum drawdown to Nov 2, 2026. The periods differ, so the two are not comparable. See the Position Size Calculator.

Tools to compare SCHD vs VYM

Static weights from this page
Cost of the fee gap · compounded difference
SCHD ending–
VYM ending–
Difference–

Ignores taxes, spreads and holdings differences. ETF Fee Calculator.

Where would your money land?
SCHD largest (4.45%)–
SCHD top ten (41.2%)–
SCHD staples, health, energy (54.6%)–
VYM largest (6.9%)–
VYM top ten (26.2%)–
VYM financials + tech (34.7%)–

Check shared exposure with the Diversification Calculator.

SCHD vs VYM, which fits which job

Characteristics, not recommendations

SCHD may suit investors who want…

A higher-yielding, more concentrated U.S. dividend fund built on dividend quality.

Strengths

  • Higher yield: 3.12% SEC against 1.43%
  • Defensive tilt: 39.3% staples, health care and utilities
  • Stronger 1-year return to Sep 30, 2026 (+23.36%)
  • $119.9B in assets and over 3.4 billion shares

Watch points

  • Costs 0.06% against 0.04%
  • Ten largest about 41%; about 102 stocks
  • Energy is 15.4% of assets; technology only 12.2%
  • Behind VIG over 3, 5 and 10 years at Sep 30; turnover 40.6%

VYM may suit investors who want…

A broad, low-cost U.S. high-yield fund with a long track record and a cyclical mix, accepting a lower yield than SCHD.

Strengths

  • Lower fee: 0.04% against 0.06%
  • 593 holdings; ten largest about 26%
  • Led SCHD in each calendar year 2022 to 2025
  • Low turnover (11.3%); launched 2006

Watch points

  • Lower yield: 2.24% trailing against 3.24%
  • Financials 20.4% and Broadcom 6.9%
  • Behind SCHD over 1 and 10 years at Sep 30
  • SEC yield and spread not captured here
Neither is a complete portfolio. Both are U.S. dividend equity. Start from a core portfolio and size a dividend fund inside your allocation; many of these stocks also sit in broad funds such as VTI and VOO. This is general education, not tax or investment advice.

SCHD vs VYM investor scenarios

Characteristics that fit, not recommendations
Income-focusedWants the higher yield and accepts a defensive, energy-heavy mix and higher turnover.SCHD 3.24% trailing yield
Breadth and costWants a wide, low-cost high-yield list and accepts a lower yield and a cyclical mix.VYM 593 holdings
Already owns a broad indexHolds VTI or VOO. Either fund adds a dividend tilt; check overlap first.Check overlap first
Canadian investorHolds U.S.-listed ETFs in USD and weighs withholding tax by account type: TFSA, RRSP or taxable.Confirm with a tax pro

SCHD vs VYM key terms

Plain-language definitions
Trailing yieldDividends paid over the past 12 months divided by the price. It looks back and can differ from the SEC yield.SCHD 3.24% · VYM 2.24%
Forecast dividend yieldA yield based on expected dividends. VYM’s index selects stocks whose forecast yield is above average.VYM
Dividend quality screenA rule that picks stocks on financial strength and dividend sustainability, not just yield.SCHD
TurnoverHow much of a fund is bought and sold in a year. Higher turnover can mean more taxable distributions.SCHD 40.61% · VYM 11.3%

SCHD vs VYM, frequently asked questions

Answers use the figures and dates shown above

Is SCHD or VYM better?

Neither is better for everyone. SCHD pays a higher yield (3.24% trailing against 2.24% for VYM) and led over 1 and 10 years to Sep 30, 2026. VYM costs less (0.04% against 0.06%), holds 593 stocks against about 102, and led SCHD in each calendar year from 2022 to 2025. The right choice depends on whether you value yield and a quality screen or breadth and low cost.

Which pays the higher dividend yield, SCHD or VYM?

SCHD. Its 30-day SEC yield was 3.12% (Nov 5, 2026) and its trailing 12-month yield 3.24% (Sep 30). VYM’s trailing yield was 2.24% (ETF Central, Nov 2) and about 2.31% on StockAnalysis’s figure; its SEC yield was not captured. VYM pays more dollars per share only because its share price is higher.

What are the expense ratios of SCHD and VYM?

SCHD’s expense ratio is 0.06%, or $6 a year per $10,000. VYM’s is 0.04% per Vanguard’s most recent prospectus, or $4 a year per $10,000.

How much do SCHD and VYM overlap?

Only one stock, Chevron, appears in both top-ten lists. By this page’s own sector arithmetic, the two funds overlap about 75% by sector weight, because both hold large U.S. dividend payers. A fund-level weight overlap was not captured.

What index does each ETF track?

SCHD tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. VYM tracks the FTSE High Dividend Yield Index. Both are passive, quarterly-paying U.S. dividend funds listed on NYSE Arca.

What are the top holdings of SCHD and VYM?

SCHD’s largest positions on Nov 5, 2026 were Procter & Gamble (4.45%), Home Depot (4.32%), Texas Instruments (4.29%), Coca-Cola (4.27%) and Amgen (4.09%). VYM’s largest on Sep 30, 2026 were Broadcom (6.9%), JPMorgan Chase (3.8%), Exxon Mobil (2.8%), Johnson & Johnson (2.7%) and AbbVie (2.0%).

Which has performed better, SCHD or VYM?

It depends on the window. To Sep 30, 2026 SCHD led over 1 year (23.36% vs 12.72%) and 10 years (12.44% vs 11.28%), and VYM led over 3 years (17.67% vs 15.44%) and 5 years (11.63% vs 9.48%), annualized on NAV. VYM led each calendar year from 2022 to 2025; SCHD led 2026 year to date. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which grew its dividend faster?

VYM’s last four payouts total $3.676 per share, about 4.5% above the prior four. SCHD’s last four total $1.054, about 2.0% above the prior four. Short windows are noisy and past growth does not guarantee future growth.

How do SCHD and VYM differ by sector?

SCHD (Sep 30, 2026) was 20.0% consumer staples, 19.2% health care and 15.4% energy. VYM (Sep 30, 2026) was 20.4% financials, 14.3% technology, 13.6% industrials and 13.4% health care, with 5.4% in utilities and no real estate.

Can I own both SCHD and VYM?

You can. They share only one top-ten stock but overlap by about 75% by sector weight, so owning both adds less diversification than it seems. Check your combined overlap with a diversification calculator and size positions against your whole portfolio.

Which is less volatile, SCHD or VYM?

VYM’s three-year standard deviation was 11.11% against 13.75% for SCHD at Sep 30, 2026, and VYM’s turnover is much lower (11.3% against 40.61%). Maximum drawdowns were reported for different periods: about 33.4% for SCHD’s worst decline in a decade (BestETF) and 14.4% for VYM over three years (ETF Central), so do not compare those two figures.

Are SCHD and VYM suitable for Canadian investors?

Both are U.S.-listed and trade in U.S. dollars, so Canadians face currency conversion costs and may face U.S. withholding tax on dividends. Treatment differs across TFSA, RRSP and taxable accounts. This is general education, not tax advice; confirm with a tax professional.

SCHD vs VYM documents and sources

Open the issuer documents before relying on any figure

Third-party sources

StockAnalysis · TotalRealReturns · ETF Central · BestETF.

Methodology and limits

  • SCHD figures come from Schwab (Nov 5–6 and Sep 30, 2026). VYM figures come from Vanguard’s fact sheet (Sep 30, 2026) and ETF Central (Nov 2–3, 2026).
  • Top-ten holdings are Schwab (Nov 5) for SCHD and Vanguard (Sep 30) for VYM, so dates differ by about five weeks.
  • Sector overlap of 75% is this page’s sum of the smaller sector weight in each fund (both Sep 30, 2026). Fund-level weight overlap, daily-move correlation, VYM SEC yield, spread, premium or discount, shares outstanding and capital gains history were not captured.
  • Calendar-year returns for both funds come from TotalRealReturns (nominal, dividends reinvested), as of Nov 6, 2026.
  • Growth of $10,000 is derived from each issuer’s annualized NAV returns; dollar values are approximate.
  • Drawdowns: SCHD is BestETF’s 10-year worst decline; VYM is ETF Central’s three-year maximum drawdown. They cover different periods and are third party.
  • Index rules summarize provider descriptions; confirm eligibility rules, caps and rebalance dates in each prospectus.

Educational research, not personalized investment, tax or legal advice, and not a recommendation to buy or sell any fund. Investing involves risk, including loss of principal. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Calculators are hypothetical illustrations. Fund data are provided as published by the sources named and may differ from current figures.