QYLD vs XYLD ETF comparison

INVEST & COMPOUND · ETF RESEARCHCovered Call Income ETFs · Comparison · Reviewed November 11, 2026
Invest & Compound · ETF ResearchData: Issuer fund pages, Sep 30 to Nov 11, 2026

QYLD vs XYLD

Yield, fees and the trade-off

QYLD holds the Nasdaq-100 and sells at-the-money Nasdaq-100 calls every month, a rules-based covered call fund, and XYLD holds the S&P 500 and sells at-the-money S&P 500 calls every month, a rules-based covered call fund. QYLD is built around Nasdaq-100 and XYLD around S&P 500, so they own different stocks and weight sectors differently.

Both sell call options for income, which caps their upside in strong markets. QYLD charges 0.60% and XYLD charges 0.60%. This page lines up what each fund owns, how the two overlap, what each costs, how each has performed against the market and how each trades, with the date next to every number.

QYLDGlobal X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call ETF
All other holdings53.5%Top 10 holdings46.5%
StrategyCovered call income
ReferenceNasdaq-100
Expense ratio0.60%
Net assets$8.06B
PaysMonthly distributions
LaunchedDec 11, 2013
XYLDGlobal X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF
All other holdings62.9%Top 10 holdings37.1%
StrategyCovered call income
ReferenceS&P 500
Expense ratio0.60%
Net assets$3.34B
PaysMonthly distributions
LaunchedJun 21, 2013
!
The top ten holdings of QYLD and XYLD overlap by 29.4%. They share 6 of their ten largest holdings.
0.00%Expense ratio gap: QYLD 0.60%, XYLD 0.60%
29.4%Top-10 holdings overlap (issuer holdings, dates in the overlap card)
$8.06B / $3.34BNet assets, QYLD / XYLD (Nov 10, 2026)
15.64% / 14.35%1-year NAV return, QYLD / XYLD (to Oct 31, 2026)
QYLD: Global X fund page. XYLD: Global X fund page (see Documents and sources). Educational, not advice.
Quick answerUpdated November 11, 2026

QYLD vs XYLD, the short answer

QYLD and XYLD both sell call options to pay monthly income. QYLD is built around Nasdaq-100 and XYLD around S&P 500, so they own different stocks and weight sectors differently. Both sell call options for income, which caps their upside in strong markets. Expense ratios are 0.60% and 0.60%, which is $60 and $60 a year per $10,000.

NAV total returns, annualized (both to Oct 31, 2026): 1 year 15.64% vs 14.35%; 3 years 15.78% vs 14.23%; 5 years 7.77% vs 7.21%. Their top ten holdings overlap by 29.4%. Neither is better for everyone; the choice turns on cost, income needs and how much upside you will give up.

CostXYLD costs less: 0.60% vs 0.60%$60 a year per $10,000 vs $60
Income12.87% vs 10.86%payout measures differ, see yield section
Overlap29.4% of the top ten6 shared holdings
Track recordQYLD led 3 of 3 windows1 year 15.64% vs 14.35% (1 year)
Figures from the issuer pages named in the data room, with dates. Educational, not advice.
Fund guidesFull profile of each fund

Want the full picture of one fund before you compare? Read the complete guide for each fund: QYLD guide and XYLD guide. Each guide covers fees, holdings, yield, returns and taxes.

OverlapTop-ten lists · weights as of the dates shown

QYLD vs XYLD overlap, if you own both

29.4%top-10 holdings overlap · 6 shared top-ten holdings

QYLD · ten largest holdings

As of Nov 10, 2026
  1. 1Apple Inc. AAPL8.47%Both
  2. 2Nvidia Corp NVDA6.78%Both
  3. 3Microsoft Corp MSFT6.60%Both
  4. 4Amazon.com Inc. AMZN4.87%Both
  5. 5Advanced Micro Devices AMD3.87%Only here
  6. 6Micron Technology Inc. MU3.77%Only here
  7. 7Tesla Inc. TSLA3.32%Only here
  8. 8Meta Platforms Inc. META3.18%Both
  9. 9Space Exploration Technologies Class A SPCX2.82%Only here
  10. 10Alphabet Inc. Class A GOOGL2.81%Both

Ten largest total 46.5%

XYLD · ten largest holdings

As of Nov 10, 2026
  1. 1Apple Inc. AAPL7.85%Both
  2. 2Nvidia Corp NVDA6.31%Both
  3. 3Microsoft Corp MSFT6.11%Both
  4. 4Amazon.com Inc. AMZN4.10%Both
  5. 5Alphabet Inc. Class A GOOGL2.60%Both
  6. 6Broadcom Inc. AVGO2.44%Only here
  7. 7Meta Platforms Inc. META2.18%Both
  8. 8Alphabet Inc. Class C GOOG2.09%Both
  9. 9Eli Lilly & Co LLY1.77%Only here
  10. 10Berkshire Hathaway Inc. Class B BRK.B1.68%Only here

Ten largest total 37.1%

Shared by both · 6 companies

CompanyQYLD weightXYLD weightGap
Apple Inc. AAPL8.47%7.85%+0.62 pts
Nvidia Corp NVDA6.78%6.31%+0.47 pts
Microsoft Corp MSFT6.60%6.11%+0.49 pts
Amazon.com Inc. AMZN4.87%4.10%+0.77 pts
Meta Platforms Inc. META3.18%2.18%+1.00 pts
Alphabet (all classes) GOOGL2.81%4.69%-1.88 pts

Only in QYLD’s top ten: Advanced Micro Devices, Micron Technology Inc., Tesla Inc., Space Exploration Technologies Class A. Only in XYLD’s top ten: Broadcom Inc., Eli Lilly & Co, Berkshire Hathaway Inc. Class B. Alphabet Class A and Class C are counted as one company and their weights are added.

In QYLD’s top ten
In XYLD’s top ten
29.4%
top-10 holdings overlap · 6 shared top-ten holdings
Overlap is measured on the ten largest holdings only. Both funds also sell call options, which adds shared market exposure that holdings tables do not show.

The twist

Top-10 overlap
29.4%
Top-ten weight, QYLD
46.5%
Top-ten weight, XYLD
37.1%

6 of the ten largest holdings are shared, and the overlap is 29.4% by the smaller-weight method. Real overlap is likely higher, since the rest of each portfolio is not counted. Both funds also sell call options.

Top ten holdings: QYLD Nov 10, 2026, XYLD Nov 10, 2026. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding. Not advice.
GoalsCharacteristics, not recommendations

QYLD vs XYLD, one goal, which fund?

FundYour goalWhyThe evidence
XYLDLower costLower expense ratioXYLD 0.60% vs QYLD 0.60% ($60 vs $60 a year per $10,000)
QYLDA larger fundMore assetsQYLD holds $8.06B against $3.34B for XYLD (Nov 10, 2026)
NEITHERIncome levelCompare the payoutQYLD 12.87% (trailing 12-month distribution, Global X) and XYLD 10.86% (trailing 12-month distribution, Global X); the measures are defined differently by each issuer
QYLDHigher 5-year returnLed over 5 yearsQYLD 7.77% vs XYLD 7.21% annualized, NAV total return (both to Oct 31, 2026)
NEITHERCapped upsideBoth sell callsBoth give up some gains in strong markets in return for monthly income
Fund figures from the issuers named in the data room. Examples, not recommendations.
HoldingsTop ten holdings · Nov 10, 2026 and Nov 10, 2026

QYLD vs XYLD, where the money goes

QYLD · Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call ETF

XYLD · Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF

The ten largest holdings make up 46.5% of QYLD and 37.1% of XYLD.
Weights from the issuer pages, dated Nov 10, 2026 for QYLD and Nov 10, 2026 for XYLD. Holdings change often. Not advice.
ReturnsAnnualized total returns, matched dates

QYLD vs XYLD returns compared over 1, 3 and 5 years

+15.64%QYLD 1-year NAV total return to Oct 31, 2026
+14.35%XYLD 1-year NAV total return to Oct 31, 2026
7.77% vs 7.21%5-year annualized NAV total return, QYLD vs XYLD
1 year 15.64% vs 14.35%; 3 years 15.78% vs 14.23%; 5 years 7.77% vs 7.21%. Both funds report to the same date, so the windows are matched.
Matched dates: QYLD led 3 of 3 windows and XYLD led 0. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
FeesAs stated by each issuer

QYLD vs XYLD, what each fund costs a year

$60QYLD, per $10,000 · 0.60%
$60XYLD, per $10,000 · 0.60%
The fees are 0.60% and 0.60%, so the calculator below shows a difference of $0 a year per $10,000.
QYLD expense ratio 0.60% and XYLD expense ratio 0.60%, as stated on each issuer page. Illustrative arithmetic, not a forecast.

The data room

Every figure behind the QYLD vs XYLD cards above, with its source, date and evidence grade. Open the issuer documents before relying on any number.

QYLD vs XYLD key facts

Evidence grade: Issuer issuer page · Mixed issuer plus provider · 3rd party
MetricQYLDXYLDGrade and source

Portfolio characteristics

MetricQYLDXYLDGrade and source

Net assets are dated Nov 10, 2026 for both funds (QYLD $8.06B; XYLD $3.34B). Figures an issuer page does not show are left out or marked Not captured, not estimated.

QYLD vs XYLD holdings, how each fund is built

Issuer pages · Nov 2026
ItemQYLDXYLD
StrategyHolds the Nasdaq-100 stocks and sells at-the-money Nasdaq-100 call options on the full portfolio each monthHolds the S&P 500 stocks and sells at-the-money S&P 500 call options on the full portfolio each month
Number of holdings102 (Nov 10, 2026)505 (Nov 10, 2026)
Top ten share of fund46.5%37.1%
Reference indexCboe NASDAQ-100 BuyWrite V2 IndexCboe S&P 500 BuyWrite Index
Call option positionShort Nasdaq call, strike 29,675, 6.97% upside before cap, expires Nov 20, 2026Short S&P 500 call, strike 7,740, 2.91% upside before cap, expires Nov 20, 2026
ExchangeNasdaqNYSE Arca
LaunchedDec 11, 2013Jun 21, 2013

Option positions are listed only where the issuer page publishes them. Gaps are marked Not captured. An equity-linked note or call spread is a different tool from a plain covered call, but all three cap some upside in exchange for income.

QYLD vs XYLD against the market, what the income costs

NAV total return vs index, to Oct 31, 2026
Fund and periodFund NAVIndexIndex returnFund minus index, pts
QYLD · 1 year15.64%Cboe NASDAQ-100 BuyWrite V2 Index16.41%-0.77
QYLD · 3 years15.78%Cboe NASDAQ-100 BuyWrite V2 Index16.95%-1.17
QYLD · 5 years7.77%Cboe NASDAQ-100 BuyWrite V2 Index8.65%-0.88
XYLD · 1 year14.35%Cboe S&P 500 BuyWrite Index16.35%-2.00
XYLD · 3 years14.23%Cboe S&P 500 BuyWrite Index15.41%-1.18
XYLD · 5 years7.21%Cboe S&P 500 BuyWrite Index8.23%-1.02
Implication. A covered call fund gives up some of the market’s gains in return for income, so the gap to the market index in this table is the cost of selling upside. A negative gap is not a tracking error, it is the design. Where an issuer page did not show a comparison index, the row is left out.

What you actually own

Income sourceBoth funds sell call options. The premium is paid out monthly along with any dividends from the stocks held.Monthly
The cost of incomeSelling calls caps gains in strong markets, so these funds can trail the market they follow when it rises quickly.Upside cap
Fee mechanicsExpense ratios are taken from fund assets every day and are already reflected in NAV.QYLD 0.60% · XYLD 0.60%
PayoutDistributions are not guaranteed and can change from month to month with option premiums and market moves.Variable

QYLD vs XYLD performance

Matched dates, to Oct 31, 2026

All rows come from the issuer pages and are dated Oct 31, 2026 for both funds, so they compare like for like. NAV returns include fees. “Since inception” starts in different years (QYLD 2013, XYLD 2013). Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Latest returns. The issuer page did not show a year-to-date figure for QYLD and XYLD. Income funds can look very different from the market in a sharp rally or a sharp fall.

Growth of a hypothetical $10,000 · NAV total return, to Oct 31, 2026

Derived from issuer NAV total returns (compounded). Fund expenses are already in NAV. Illustration, not a forecast.

QYLD vs XYLD yield, dividends and dividend growth

Yield and distribution facts
Yield definitions
MeasureQYLDXYLD
30-day SEC yield-0.02%0.48%
Payout measure12.87% (trailing 12-month distribution, Global X)10.86% (trailing 12-month distribution, Global X)
DistributionsMonthlyMonthly
Fee per $10,000 a year$60$60

The payout figures are not directly comparable. QYLD reports 12.87% (trailing 12-month distribution, Global X) and XYLD reports 10.86% (trailing 12-month distribution, Global X). The 30-day SEC yield (-0.02% for QYLD and 0.48% for XYLD) follows a standard formula and can sit far below the payout figure, because option premiums are not counted the same way.

A high payout is not the same as a high return: part of a payout can be your own capital coming back, which lowers NAV. See NAV erosion, covered call ETFs and yield vs total return.

QYLD vs XYLD trading and liquidity

Issuer fund pages · Nov 10, 2026
$8.06B / $3.34BNet assets, QYLD / XYLD (Nov 10, 2026)
458.19M / 81.45MShares outstanding, QYLD / XYLD
0.06% / 0.02%30-day median bid/ask spread, QYLD / XYLD
$17.59 / $40.96Closing price, QYLD / XYLD (Nov 10, 2026)

QYLD trades on Nasdaq and XYLD on NYSE Arca. Spreads on the issuer pages were 0.06% for QYLD and 0.02% for XYLD, and a spread of 0.02% is about $20 between the buy and sell price on $100,000. Larger funds usually trade with tighter spreads, which matters more for frequent traders than for long-term holders. Use limit orders for large trades and avoid the first and last minutes of the session. See creation, redemption and trading for how NAV, premiums and spreads arise.

QYLD vs XYLD expense ratio and fees in dollars

As stated by each issuer
BalanceQYLD (0.60%)XYLD (0.60%)Gap per year
$10,000$60$60$0
$50,000$300$300$0
$100,000$600$600$0

The expense ratio is taken from fund assets, not billed to you. Fees exclude the bid/ask spread, any premium or discount to NAV, brokerage commissions and taxes.

QYLD vs XYLD, what each trust holds and how it is valued

Structure, in plain language

QYLD · Cboe NASDAQ-100 BuyWrite V2 Index

QYLD Holds the Nasdaq-100 stocks and sells at-the-money Nasdaq-100 call options on the full portfolio each month. It was launched in Dec 11, 2013 and charges 0.60%. Option terms, risks and tax treatment are described in the prospectus and on the issuer page.

XYLD · Cboe S&P 500 BuyWrite Index

XYLD Holds the S&P 500 stocks and sells at-the-money S&P 500 call options on the full portfolio each month. It was launched in Jun 21, 2013 and charges 0.60%. Option terms, risks and tax treatment are described in the prospectus and on the issuer page.

Custody, valuation and fee terms sit in each prospectus; read them before relying on this summary.

QYLD vs XYLD, why yield and returns differ

The fee explains most of the gap

QYLD is built around Nasdaq-100 and XYLD around S&P 500, so they own different stocks and weight sectors differently. Both sell call options for income, which caps their upside in strong markets.

Covered call funds trade some of the market’s upside for steady monthly income. That is why the comparison against the market index above matters more than any single payout figure: the question is how much return you keep after the options are written.

How to decide between QYLD and XYLD

A step-by-step framework

Start with what separates them: QYLD is built around Nasdaq-100 and XYLD around S&P 500, so they own different stocks and weight sectors differently. Both sell call options for income, which caps their upside in strong markets.

  • Step 1 · Market: QYLD follows Nasdaq-100 and XYLD follows S&P 500, so decide which exposure you want to own.
  • Step 2 · Cost: QYLD 0.60% vs XYLD 0.60%, or $60 vs $60 a year per $10,000.
  • Step 3 · Income and total return: compare the payout to the NAV return, not the payout alone.
  • Step 4 · What you own: check whether you already hold these stocks through another fund with the Diversification Calculator.

Size the position against your whole portfolio. Income funds can lag in rallies and still fall in selloffs, so they usually play a defined role.

QYLD vs XYLD for Canadian investors

Currency and account type

QYLD and XYLD are U.S.-listed and trade in U.S. dollars, so buying them from a Canadian account usually involves converting Canadian dollars, which adds a cost on entry and exit. A move in the U.S. dollar also changes your return in Canadian dollars.

Monthly distributions from U.S. funds can face U.S. withholding tax depending on the account type, and the split between income types varies. Confirm the rules for your account with a tax professional. This is general education, not tax advice.

Risks of QYLD and XYLD

What can go wrong

Shared risks

  • Selling call options caps gains, so both funds can trail the market in strong rallies.
  • Payouts are not guaranteed and can fall when option premiums or markets change.
  • A high payout can include return of capital, which lowers NAV; the payout alone does not show total return.
  • Neither fund protects fully against a market decline, because the stocks are still held.

Fund-specific risks

  • QYLD: Holds the Nasdaq-100 stocks and sells at-the-money Nasdaq-100 call options on the full portfolio each month.
  • XYLD: Holds the S&P 500 stocks and sells at-the-money S&P 500 call options on the full portfolio each month.
  • QYLD: expense ratio 0.60%, net assets $8.06B. XYLD: expense ratio 0.60%, net assets $3.34B.
  • Both: see each prospectus for option, derivative and tax disclosures.

QYLD vs XYLD taxes and account placement

General education, not tax advice

Distributions from covered call funds can include ordinary income, qualified dividends, short-term or long-term capital gains and return of capital, and the mix changes from year to year. Option premiums are often taxed differently from stock dividends. Each issuer publishes a tax breakdown after year end, which is the figure to use, not the monthly payout.

For Canadian account types, see the Canadian section above. Confirm the rules for your account with a tax professional, and read how to build an ETF portfolio. This is general education, not tax advice.

Other ETFs people compare

For context, not recommendations

Investors comparing QYLD and XYLD often also look at the other covered call income funds in this group: JEPI, JEPQ, QYLD, XYLD, DIVO and SPYI. See the other covered call income ETF comparisons, the dividend ETFs and the ETF research hub.

QYLD vs XYLD drawdown arithmetic

What a decline means in dollars
−10%–
−20%–
−30% (illustrative, QYLD)–
−30% (illustrative, XYLD)–

Recovery gain = decline ÷ (1 − decline). The scenarios use illustrative declines of 10%, 20% and 30% so you can see what a drop does to each fund. Covered call funds still hold the stocks, so they can fall alongside the market. They are not a worst-case figure. See the Position Size Calculator.

Tools to compare QYLD vs XYLD

Static weights from this page
Cost of the fee gap · compounded difference
QYLD ending–
XYLD ending–
Difference–

Ignores taxes, spreads and holdings differences. ETF Fee Calculator.

Where would your money land?
QYLD stocks and options (100%)–
QYLD fee, one year (0.60%)–
QYLD fees over 10 years, simple (6.0%)–
XYLD stocks and options (100%)–
XYLD fee, one year (0.60%)–
XYLD fees over 10 years, simple (6.0%)–

Check shared exposure with the Diversification Calculator.

QYLD vs XYLD, which fits which job

Characteristics, not recommendations

QYLD may suit investors who want…

A rules-based Nasdaq-100 covered call approach with a long record.

Strengths

  • Larger fund: $8.06B against $3.34B
  • Led in 3 of 3 return windows (to Oct 31, 2026)
  • Monthly income from options and dividends
  • Exchange-traded and priced all day

Watch points

  • Higher fee: 0.60% against 0.60%
  • Capped upside in strong markets
  • Payouts can change month to month

XYLD may suit investors who want…

A rules-based S&P 500 covered call approach with a long record.

Strengths

  • Monthly income from options and dividends
  • Exchange-traded and priced all day

Watch points

  • Higher fee: 0.60% against 0.60%
  • Smaller fund: $3.34B against $8.06B
  • Led in 0 of 3 return windows (to Oct 31, 2026)
  • Capped upside in strong markets
Neither is a complete portfolio. Both own a concentrated slice of U.S. large caps and cap their upside. Start from a core portfolio and size a position inside your allocation. This is general education, not tax or investment advice.

QYLD vs XYLD investor scenarios

Characteristics that fit, not recommendations
Lowest costWants covered call income at the lowest annual fee.QYLD 0.60% · XYLD 0.60%
Monthly incomeWants regular cash flow and accepts a capped upside.Compare payout and NAV return
Growth tiltWants income but still wants Nasdaq-100 style growth stocks.JEPQ and QYLD hold Nasdaq stocks
Canadian investorHolds U.S.-listed ETFs in USD and weighs currency cost by account type.Confirm with a tax pro

QYLD vs XYLD key terms

Plain-language definitions
Covered callSelling a call option on stocks you own, which earns a premium but caps the gain if the price rises past the strike.Both funds
Equity-linked noteA bond-like note whose payout is tied to a stock option position, used by JEPI and JEPQ.JEPI, JEPQ
NAV erosionA fall in net asset value when payouts exceed what the fund earns.Payout risk
Return of capitalA payout that returns part of your own money, which is not income.Tax
QYLD vs XYLD at a glance: fees, income, top holdings overlap and returns for two covered call income ETFs
QYLD vs XYLD at a glance, reviewed November 11, 2026

QYLD vs XYLD, frequently asked questions

Answers use the figures and dates shown above

Is QYLD or XYLD better?

In the QYLD vs XYLD question, neither is better for everyone. QYLD and XYLD both sell call options to pay monthly income. QYLD is built around Nasdaq-100 and XYLD around S&P 500, so they own different stocks and weight sectors differently. Both sell call options for income, which caps their upside in strong markets.

Expense ratios are 0.60% and 0.60%, which is $60 and $60 a year per $10,000. NAV total returns, annualized (both to Oct 31, 2026): 1 year 15.64% vs 14.35%; 3 years 15.78% vs 14.23%; 5 years 7.77% vs 7.21%. Their top ten holdings overlap by 29.4%. Neither is better for everyone; the choice turns on cost, income needs and how much upside you will give up.

QYLD vs XYLD, what are the expense ratios?

QYLD charges 0.60% and XYLD charges 0.60%, which is $60 and $60 a year per $10,000.

QYLD vs XYLD, how much do the funds overlap?

On QYLD vs XYLD, the top ten holdings overlap by 29.4% on the issuer data, with 6 shared names. This counts only the ten largest holdings of each fund, so the full portfolio overlap may differ.

QYLD vs XYLD, what does each ETF hold?

QYLD Holds the Nasdaq-100 stocks and sells at-the-money Nasdaq-100 call options on the full portfolio each month. XYLD Holds the S&P 500 stocks and sells at-the-money S&P 500 call options on the full portfolio each month.

QYLD vs XYLD, which has performed better?

NAV total returns, annualized (both to Oct 31, 2026): 1 year 15.64% vs 14.35%; 3 years 15.78% vs 14.23%; 5 years 7.77% vs 7.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

QYLD vs XYLD, which pays more income?

QYLD reports 12.87% (trailing 12-month distribution, Global X) and XYLD reports 10.86% (trailing 12-month distribution, Global X). The measures are defined differently, so compare them with the NAV return before choosing.

QYLD vs XYLD, can I own both?

On QYLD vs XYLD, you can. Both sell call options, so owning both adds a second fee, and shared holdings repeat the same stocks (top-10 overlap 29.4%).

QYLD vs XYLD, do the funds pay dividends?

On QYLD vs XYLD, both pay monthly distributions funded by stock dividends and option premiums. The amount changes from month to month.

QYLD vs XYLD, how are distributions taxed?

On QYLD vs XYLD, distributions can include ordinary income, dividends, capital gains and return of capital, and the mix changes each year. Each issuer publishes a year-end tax breakdown. Confirm with a tax professional. This is general education, not tax advice.

QYLD vs XYLD, are they suitable for Canadian investors?

On QYLD vs XYLD, both are U.S.-listed and trade in U.S. dollars, so Canadians face currency conversion costs, and withholding tax on distributions depends on the account. Confirm with a tax professional. This is general education, not tax advice.

QYLD vs XYLD documents and sources

Open the issuer documents before relying on any figure

QYLD · Global X

XYLD · Global X

Third-party sources

Global X QYLD fund page · Global X XYLD fund page.

Methodology and limits

  • QYLD figures come from the Global X fund page and XYLD figures from the Global X fund page.
  • Dates are shown beside each figure; the issuer documents are linked below.
  • Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding among the ten largest holdings published for each fund.
  • Comparison index returns come from the issuer page; funds without one on the page are left out of the table.
  • Figures an issuer page does not show are marked Not captured, and nothing was filled from memory or from another fund.
  • Returns are dated Oct 31, 2026 for both funds on this page. Growth of $10,000 is derived from annualized NAV total returns; dollar values are approximate.

Educational research, not personalized investment, tax or legal advice, and not a recommendation to buy or sell any fund. Investing involves risk, including loss of principal. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Calculators are hypothetical illustrations. Fund data are provided as published by the sources named and may differ from current figures.