VB vs SCHA ETF comparison

INVEST & COMPOUND · ETF RESEARCHSmall Cap ETFs · Comparison · Reviewed November 9, 2026
Invest & Compound · ETF ResearchData: Issuer pages and holdings files, Sep 30 to Nov 9, 2026

VB vs SCHA

Two small cap indexes, two sets of rules

VB holds U.S. small companies and some mid-size ones, and SCHA holds a wide range of U.S. small cap stocks. The two funds follow different indexes. The Morningstar US Small Cap Index covers the small slice of the market by size and also includes some mid-size companies.

The Dow Jones U.S. Small-Cap Total Stock Market Index covers small cap stocks across the market and holds the most names of the group. VB charges 0.03% and SCHA charges 0.03%. This page lines up what each fund holds, how much they overlap, what each paid and how each performed, with the date next to every number.

VBVanguard Small-Cap ETF
Industrials20.3%Technology16.1%Health care14.1%Consumer discretionary12.7%Financials12.2%
Holds1,301 stocks
Ten largest positions5.0%
Expense ratio0.03%
Net assets$77.22B
PaysQuarterly
Launched2004
SCHASchwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF
Financials18.2%Health care17.1%Industrials16.3%Technology13.1%Consumer discretionary11.5%
Holds1,743 stocks
Ten largest positions2.8%
Expense ratio0.03%
Net assets$22.32B
PaysQuarterly
Launched2009
!
VB holds 1,301 stocks and SCHA holds 1,743. 40.6% of the weight is shared by ticker in the full holdings files (Sep 30, 2026 and Nov 6, 2026).
0.00%Expense ratio gap: VB 0.03%, SCHA 0.03%
40.6%Holdings overlap by ticker (full holdings files, Sep 30, 2026 and Nov 6, 2026)
5.0% / 2.8%Ten largest positions, VB / SCHA
2 – 2Return windows led, VB – SCHA
VB: Vanguard fund pages (see Documents and sources). SCHA: Schwab fund pages (see Documents and sources). Educational, not advice.
Quick answerUpdated November 9, 2026

VB vs SCHA, the short answer

VB and SCHA differ in what they hold and what they charge. The two funds follow different indexes. The Morningstar US Small Cap Index covers the small slice of the market by size and also includes some mid-size companies. The Dow Jones U.S. Small-Cap Total Stock Market Index covers small cap stocks across the market and holds the most names of the group.

Expense ratios are 0.03% and 0.03%. Market price total returns, annualized (both to Nov 9, 2026): 1 year 17.75% vs 21.78%; 3 years 19.21% vs 20.82%; 5 years 5.85% vs 5.45%; 10 years 10.29% vs 9.66%. Neither is better for everyone; the choice turns on cost, which markets you want, and what you already own.

CostIdentical fee.$3 a year per $10,000 vs $3
Holdings1,301 vs 1,743 stocksTen largest 5.0% vs 2.8%
Overlap40.6% of the weight is sharedticker match, full holdings files, Sep 30, 2026 and Nov 6, 2026
Track recordSee the returns section.1 year 17.75% vs 21.78% (1 year)
Figures from the issuer pages named in the data room, with dates. Educational, not advice.
OverlapTop-ten lists · weights as of the dates shown

VB vs SCHA overlap, if you own both

40.6%of the weight shared by ticker (full holdings files, Sep 30, 2026 and Nov 6, 2026) · 0 shared top-ten stocks

VB · ten largest holdings

As of Sep 30, 2026
  1. 1Natera NTRA0.72%Only here
  2. 2Twilio TWLO0.57%Only here
  3. 3Revolution Medicines RVMD0.53%Only here
  4. 4Illumina ILMN0.52%Only here
  5. 5Everpure P0.52%Only here
  6. 6Okta OKTA0.44%Only here
  7. 7Moderna MRNA0.44%Only here
  8. 8EMCOR Group EME0.42%Only here
  9. 9Credo Technology Group CRDO0.42%Only here
  10. 10Jabil JBL0.38%Only here

Ten largest total 5.0%

SCHA · ten largest holdings

As of Nov 6, 2026
  1. 1Glaukos GKOS0.33%Only here
  2. 2Wayfair W0.32%Only here
  3. 3American Healthcare REIT AHR0.31%Only here
  4. 4Halozyme Therapeutics HALO0.29%Only here
  5. 5BrightSpring Health Services BTSG0.28%Only here
  6. 6Bitmine Immersion Technologies BMNR0.28%Only here
  7. 7Ensign Group ENSG0.26%Only here
  8. 8Ryder System R0.25%Only here
  9. 9Flowserve FLS0.25%Only here
  10. 10Wintrust Financial WTFC0.25%Only here

Ten largest total 2.8%

Shared by both · 0 companies

CompanyVB weightSCHA weightGap

Only in VB’s top ten: Natera, Twilio, Revolution Medicines, Illumina, Everpure, Okta, Moderna, EMCOR Group, Credo Technology Group, Jabil. Only in SCHA’s top ten: Glaukos, Wayfair, American Healthcare REIT, Halozyme Therapeutics, BrightSpring Health Services, Bitmine Immersion Technologies, Ensign Group, Ryder System, Flowserve, Wintrust Financial.

In VB’s top ten
In SCHA’s top ten
40.6%
of the weight shared by ticker (full holdings files, Sep 30, 2026 and Nov 6, 2026) · 0 shared top-ten stocks
Biggest sector gaps: financials is 12.2% of VB but 18.2% of SCHA; industrials is 20.3% of VB but 16.3% of SCHA

The twist

Holdings overlap (ticker)
40.6%
Sector overlap (this page)
88.9%
Top-ten weight, VB
5.0%
Top-ten weight, SCHA
2.8%

40.6% of the weight sits in stocks both funds hold (matched by ticker in the full holdings files dated Sep 30, 2026 and Nov 6, 2026), and 0 stocks appear in both top-ten lists. The funds overlap only partly, so owning both is a real choice about how much of each market you want.

Top-ten lists: VB Sep 30, 2026, SCHA Nov 6, 2026. Sector tables: VB Sep 30, 2026, SCHA Nov 6, 2026. Holdings overlap: sum of the smaller weight of each ticker held by both funds, using each issuer’s full holdings file (Sep 30, 2026 and Nov 6, 2026); it excludes cash and derivatives and the dates differ for some pairs, so treat it as an estimate. Provider sector labels differ, so sector gaps are approximate. Not advice.
GoalsCharacteristics, not recommendations

VB vs SCHA, one goal, which fund?

FundYour goalWhyThe evidence
NEITHERThe same costIdentical expense ratio$3 a year per $10,000 for each
SCHABroader coverageMore holdingsSCHA holds 1,743 stocks; VB holds 1,301
SCHAA flatter top tenLess weight in the largest namesTen largest: VB 5.0% vs SCHA 2.8% (Sep 30, 2026 vs Nov 6, 2026 dates)
VBHigher 10 years returnLed over 10 yearsVB 10.29% vs SCHA 9.66% annualized, market price total return (both to Nov 9, 2026)
NEITHERSmaller U.S. companiesBoth are small cap stock fundsBoth hold U.S. small companies and both swing with the U.S. stock market
Fund figures from the issuers named in the data room. Examples, not recommendations.
HoldingsFive largest · full top-ten tables in the data room

VB vs SCHA, where the money goes

VB · Vanguard, Sep 30, 2026

SCHA · Schwab, Nov 6, 2026

Concentration: VB ten largest total 5.0% and SCHA total 2.8%.
Top ten as listed by each issuer on the dates shown. Weights move with prices. Not advice.
ReturnsAnnualized total returns, matched dates

VB vs SCHA returns compared across calendar years

Calendar-year market price total returns (distributions reinvested), computed from daily adjusted closing prices to Dec 31 of each year. Both funds use the same days, so the years compare like for like. Source: StockAnalysis price history, Nov 9, 2026.

+17.75%VB 1-year total return to Nov 9, 2026
+21.78%SCHA 1-year total return to Nov 9, 2026
10.29% vs 9.66%10 years annualized total return, VB vs SCHA (both to Nov 9, 2026)
1 year 17.75% vs 21.78%; 3 years 19.21% vs 20.82%; 5 years 5.85% vs 5.45%; 10 years 10.29% vs 9.66%. Differences reflect what each fund holds and, to a lesser degree, fees.
Matched dates: VB led 2 of 4 windows and SCHA led 2. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
FeesAs stated by each issuer

VB vs SCHA, what each fund costs a year

$3VB, per $10,000 · 0.03%
$3SCHA, per $10,000 · 0.03%
The fees are 0.03% and 0.03%, so the calculator below shows a difference of $0.00 a year per $10,000.
VB expense ratio 0.03% (issuer). SCHA expense ratio 0.03% (issuer). Illustrative arithmetic, not a forecast.

The data room

Every figure behind the VB vs SCHA cards above, with its source, date and evidence grade. Open the issuer documents before relying on any number.

VB vs SCHA key facts

Evidence grade: Issuer issuer page · Mixed issuer plus provider · 3rd party
MetricVBSCHAGrade and source

Portfolio characteristics

MetricVBSCHAGrade and source

Net assets are for the ETF share class on different dates (VB $77.22B; SCHA $22.32B), so they are not matched. Figures that were not available are left out rather than estimated.

VB vs SCHA holdings and top ten

Click a tile · VB: Vanguard, Sep 30, 2026 · SCHA: Schwab, Nov 6, 2026
Consumer staplesHealth careEnergyTechnologyFinancialsConsumer discretionary
Select a tile
Tile area is proportional to weight.
VB
#HoldingWeight
SCHA
#HoldingWeight

Top ten sums: VB 5.0% · SCHA 2.8%. 0 shared top-ten stocks. Weights change.

VB vs SCHA sector exposure

VB: Sep 30, 2026 · SCHA: Nov 6, 2026
VB
SCHA
Implication. VB is led by industrials 20.3%, technology 16.1%, health care 14.1%. SCHA is led by financials 18.2%, health care 17.1%, industrials 16.3%.

The sector mirror

VBSCHA
Implication. Sector gaps: health care is 14.1% of VB and 17.1% of SCHA; financials are 12.2% and 18.2% (Sep 30, 2026 vs Nov 6, 2026). Providers use different sector labels, so cross-provider gaps are approximate.

Same funds, different lenses

Implication. Health care, financials, industrials and technology carry most of the weight in small cap funds. Groupings use each issuer’s sector labels and are not matched across providers.

Company size

Both hold small U.S. companies, and some also hold mid-size names. VB holds 1,301 stocks and SCHA holds 1,743.

What you actually own

IndexVB tracks the Morningstar US Small Cap Index. SCHA tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Small-Cap Total Stock Market Index.VB · SCHA
HoldingsVB holds about 1,301 stocks; SCHA holds about 1,743.Top ten 5.0% vs 2.8%
WeightingBoth weight companies mainly by market value, with caps and rules set in each index methodology. See each prospectus.Index-based
StructureBoth are exchange-traded index funds holding U.S. shares; see each prospectus for legal form and tax treatment.Legal form

VB vs SCHA performance

Matched dates, both to Nov 9, 2026; issuer NAV rows dated separately

The first rows are market price total returns computed on the same dates for both funds (to Nov 9, 2026), so they compare like for like. The 10-year figure runs from the Dec 30, 2016 close (9.9 years). The issuer NAV rows are dated separately (VB to Oct 31, 2026, SCHA to Nov 9, 2026) and include the since-inception figures. “Since inception” starts in different years (VB 2004, SCHA 2009). Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Latest returns. Year to date (Jan 1 to Nov 9, 2026, market price total return): VB +15.27%, SCHA +18.09%.

Growth of a hypothetical $10,000 · Market price total return, both to Nov 9, 2026

Both funds derived from annualized market price total returns on matched dates (compounded). Distributions reinvested; fund expenses are already in the price. Illustration, not a forecast.

VB vs SCHA yield, dividends and dividend growth

Latest eight payouts each
VB ex-datePayable$ / shareSCHA ex-datePayable$ / share
$3.65VB paid per share, 12 months to Nov 9, 2026
$0.37SCHA paid per share, 12 months to Nov 9, 2026
+6.9%VB vs the prior 12 months
-6.8%SCHA vs the prior 12 months

Paid per share, last 12 months vs the 12 months before

Payouts are listed by ex-dividend date. Small cap funds pay low, uneven dividends, so the like-for-like comparison is the total paid over the last 12 months against the 12 months before (cards above: VB $3.649 per share, SCHA $0.369 per share). Dividend yields here are 1% to 2%, so most of the return comes from price change. See yield vs total return.

Yield definitions
MeasureVBSCHA
30-day SEC yield1.33% (Oct 31, 2026)1.28% (Nov 6, 2026)
Trailing 12-month1.24% (Nov 9)1.13% (Sep 30, 2026)
Paid, last 12 months$3.649 per share$0.369 per share
FrequencyQuarterlyQuarterly

Per-share payouts differ because share prices differ, so compare yields rather than dollars. Small cap funds pay low dividends and the amounts change from quarter to quarter, so a single quarter says little. Payouts shown: VB 8, SCHA 8. See what is dividend yield and yield vs total return.

VB vs SCHA concentration and overlap

Ten largest positions · shared holdings
0Shared top-ten stocks
40.6%Holdings overlap · ticker match
2.9% / 1.5%Top five, VB / SCHA
0.7%Largest single position

Rank by rank, the ten largest positions of each fund. Top five: VB 2.9%, SCHA 1.5%. Top ten: VB 5.0%, SCHA 2.8%.

Implication. The top-ten lists do not overlap, so these funds hold different leading companies; small cap funds hold hundreds or thousands of positions, so the top ten are a small part of each fund.

VB vs SCHA trading and liquidity

Issuer and fund pages · Nov 6 to Nov 9, 2026
$77.22B / $22.32BNet assets, VB / SCHA (dates differ)
932.55M / 668.70MShares outstanding, VB / SCHA
0.03% / 0.03%30-day bid/ask spread, VB / SCHA
NYSE ArcaExchange listing, both funds

Large funds like these usually trade with small spreads, but check the live spread before you trade. A spread of 0.01% is about $10 between the buy and sell price on $100,000. Small company shares can trade less actively than large ones, so spreads can widen on volatile days. Use limit orders for large trades and avoid the first and last minutes of the session. See creation, redemption and trading for how NAV, premiums and spreads arise.

VB vs SCHA expense ratio and fees in dollars

As stated by each issuer
BalanceVB (0.03%)SCHA (0.03%)Gap per year
$10,000$3$3$0
$50,000$15$15$0
$100,000$30$30$0

Expense ratio is taken from fund assets, not billed. It excludes the bid/ask spread, any premium or discount to NAV, brokerage commissions, and taxes.

VB vs SCHA, how each fund picks its stocks

Index approach, in plain language

VB · Morningstar US Small Cap Index

VB tracks the Morningstar US Small Cap Index. VB holds about 1,301 stocks and was launched in 2004; the ten largest positions total 5.0%. Index rules and rebalance dates are in the fund’s prospectus.

SCHA · Dow Jones U.S. Small-Cap Total Stock Market Index

SCHA tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Small-Cap Total Stock Market Index. SCHA holds about 1,743 stocks and was launched in 2009; the ten largest positions total 2.8%. Index rules and rebalance dates are in the fund’s prospectus.

Exact eligibility rules, caps and rebalance dates sit in each prospectus and index methodology; read them before relying on this summary.

VB vs SCHA, why yield and returns differ

Sector mix explains much of the gap

The two funds follow different indexes. The Morningstar US Small Cap Index covers the small slice of the market by size and also includes some mid-size companies. The Dow Jones U.S. Small-Cap Total Stock Market Index covers small cap stocks across the market and holds the most names of the group.

VB follows the Morningstar US Small Cap Index and SCHA follows the Dow Jones U.S. Small-Cap Total Stock Market Index. Because each index sets its own rules, the funds hold different numbers of stocks (1,301 against 1,743) and different mixes of sectors such as health care, financials and industrials. Over any window the results can diverge in either direction, and the gap comes mostly from what each index holds and when it rebalances, not from fees.

How to decide between VB and SCHA

A step-by-step framework

Start with what separates them: The two funds follow different indexes. The Morningstar US Small Cap Index covers the small slice of the market by size and also includes some mid-size companies. The Dow Jones U.S. Small-Cap Total Stock Market Index covers small cap stocks across the market and holds the most names of the group. Then check what you already own: the funds overlap by 40.6%, so holding both is a real decision about how much of each market you want.

  • Step 1 · Market: VB holds U.S. small companies and some mid-size ones; SCHA holds a wide range of U.S. small cap stocks.
  • Step 2 · Cost: VB 0.03% vs SCHA 0.03%.
  • Step 3 · Concentration: ten largest positions 5.0% vs 2.8%.
  • Step 4 · Overlap: use the Diversification Calculator against what you own.

Size the position against your whole portfolio, including any U.S. stock fund you hold.

VB vs SCHA for Canadian investors

Currency, withholding tax and account type

VB and SCHA are U.S.-listed and trade in U.S. dollars, so buying them from a Canadian account usually involves converting Canadian dollars, which adds a cost on both entry and exit. Because the funds hold U.S. companies, a move in the U.S. dollar also changes your return in Canadian dollars.

U.S. dividends paid to Canadian residents are generally subject to U.S. withholding tax under the tax treaty; the treaty exemption usually applies inside an RRSP, while a TFSA is not exempt. Rules depend on the fund and the account, so confirm them with a tax professional. This is general education, not tax advice.

Risks of VB and SCHA

What can go wrong

Shared risks

  • Both hold smaller companies, which usually swing more than large companies and can fall sharply in a downturn.
  • Many small companies have thinner finances and less diversified businesses than large ones, so setbacks can hit harder.
  • Trading in small company shares can be thin, so spreads can widen in a sell-off.
  • Both hold U.S. stocks only, so neither adds foreign or bond diversification.

Fund-specific risks

  • VB: ten largest positions total 5.0% (Sep 30, 2026); 1,301 holdings.
  • SCHA: ten largest positions total 2.8% (Nov 6, 2026); 1,743 holdings.
  • Both: the funds track different indexes, so holdings and risks are not identical even though both hold small companies.
  • Both: exchange-traded structure; see each prospectus for legal form.

VB vs SCHA taxes and account placement

General education, not tax advice

Both funds invest in U.S. stocks. Their dividends can include qualified dividends, which may be taxed at lower rates in a taxable U.S. account when holding-period rules are met, and most of the long-run return comes from price gains that are taxed when you sell. Check each fund’s tax documents for details.

For Canadian account types and withholding tax, see the Canadian section above. Confirm the rules for your account with a tax professional, and read how to build an ETF portfolio.

Other ETFs people compare

For context, not recommendations

Investors comparing VB and SCHA often also look at the other small cap funds in this group: IWM, VTWO, IJR, VB, SCHA and VBR. See the other Small Cap ETFs comparisons and the ETF research hub.

VB vs SCHA drawdown arithmetic

What a decline means in dollars
−10%–
−20%–
−30% (illustrative, VB)–
−30% (illustrative, SCHA)–

Recovery gain = decline ÷ (1 − decline). The scenarios use illustrative declines of 10%, 20% and 30% so you can see what a drop does to each fund. They are a rough guide to a bad year, not a worst-case figure. See the Position Size Calculator.

Tools to compare VB vs SCHA

Static weights from this page
Cost of the fee gap · compounded difference
VB ending–
SCHA ending–
Difference–

Ignores taxes, spreads and holdings differences. ETF Fee Calculator.

Where would your money land?
VB largest (0.7%)–
VB top ten (5.0%)–
VB financials (12.2%)–
SCHA largest (0.3%)–
SCHA top ten (2.8%)–
SCHA financials (18.2%)–

Check shared exposure with the Diversification Calculator.

VB vs SCHA, which fits which job

Characteristics, not recommendations

VB may suit investors who want…

A small cap fund that also holds some mid-size companies.

Strengths

  • Same low fee: 0.03%
  • Led in 2 of 4 return windows (both to Nov 9, 2026)
  • Pays distributions
  • Exchange-traded and priced all day

Watch points

  • Fewer holdings: 1,301 against 1,743
  • Heavier top ten: 5.0% against 2.8%
  • Not a complete portfolio
  • Small company price swings

SCHA may suit investors who want…

The widest spread of small cap holdings.

Strengths

  • Same low fee: 0.03%
  • More holdings: 1,743 against 1,301
  • Flatter top ten: 2.8% against 5.0%
  • Led in 2 of 4 return windows (both to Nov 9, 2026)

Watch points

  • Not a complete portfolio
  • Small company price swings
Neither is a complete portfolio. Both hold only U.S. small companies and leave out large U.S. companies, bonds and foreign stocks. Start from a core portfolio and size a position inside your allocation. This is general education, not tax or investment advice.

VB vs SCHA investor scenarios

Characteristics that fit, not recommendations
Lowest cost small cap exposureWants U.S. small companies at the lowest annual fee and rarely trades.VB 0.03% · SCHA 0.03%
Adds to a large-cap coreHolds an S&P 500 or total market fund and wants more small companies.Check overlap first
Wants a value tiltWants cheaper small companies and accepts long stretches of lagging.Check the index first
Canadian investorHolds U.S.-listed ETFs in USD and weighs withholding tax and currency by account type.Confirm with a tax pro

VB vs SCHA key terms

Plain-language definitions
Small capA company whose total stock market value is small compared with large, well-known companies.All six funds
Russell 2000An index of the 2,000 smallest companies in the Russell 3000, ranked by size.IWM · VTWO
S&P 600 profit screenThe S&P SmallCap 600 only admits companies with positive recent earnings.IJR
Expense ratioThe annual fund cost as a share of assets. 0.03% is $3 a year per $10,000.VB 0.03% · IWM 0.19%
VB vs SCHA at a glance: fees, holdings overlap, top holdings and returns for two small cap ETFs
VB vs SCHA at a glance, reviewed November 10, 2026

VB vs SCHA, frequently asked questions

Answers use the figures and dates shown above

Is VB or SCHA better?

In the VB vs SCHA question, neither is better for everyone. VB and SCHA differ in what they hold and what they charge. The two funds follow different indexes. The Morningstar US Small Cap Index covers the small slice of the market by size and also includes some mid-size companies. The Dow Jones U.S. Small-Cap Total Stock Market Index covers small cap stocks across the market and holds the most names of the group.

Expense ratios are 0.03% and 0.03%. Market price total returns, annualized (both to Nov 9, 2026): 1 year 17.75% vs 21.78%; 3 years 19.21% vs 20.82%; 5 years 5.85% vs 5.45%; 10 years 10.29% vs 9.66%. Neither is better for everyone; the choice turns on cost, which markets you want, and what you already own.

VB vs SCHA, what are the expense ratios?

VB charges 0.03% and SCHA charges 0.03%, which is $3 and $3 a year per $10,000.

VB vs SCHA, how much do the funds overlap?

About 40.6% of the weight is held by both funds, matched by ticker in full holdings files dated Sep 30, 2026 and Nov 6, 2026. 0 stocks appear in both top-ten lists.

VB vs SCHA, what does each ETF track?

VB tracks the Morningstar US Small Cap Index. SCHA tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Small-Cap Total Stock Market Index.

VB vs SCHA, what are the top holdings?

VB (Sep 30, 2026): Natera 0.72%, Twilio 0.57%, Revolution Medicines 0.53%, Illumina 0.52%, Everpure 0.52%. SCHA (Nov 6, 2026): Glaukos 0.33%, Wayfair 0.32%, American Healthcare REIT 0.31%, Halozyme Therapeutics 0.29%, BrightSpring Health Services 0.28%.

VB vs SCHA, which has performed better?

Market price total returns, annualized (both to Nov 9, 2026): 1 year 17.75% vs 21.78%; 3 years 19.21% vs 20.82%; 5 years 5.85% vs 5.45%; 10 years 10.29% vs 9.66%. Returns depend on what each fund holds, and past performance does not guarantee future results.

VB vs SCHA, can I own both?

On VB vs SCHA, you can, but they overlap by about 40.6%. 0 top-ten stocks are shared. The funds overlap only partly, so owning both is a real choice about how much of each market you want.

VB vs SCHA, how often do the funds pay dividends?

VB pays quarterly and SCHA pays quarterly. Trailing yields are 1.33% and 1.28%; check each issuer page for the schedule.

VB vs SCHA, are they suitable for Canadian investors?

On VB vs SCHA, both are U.S.-listed and trade in U.S. dollars, so Canadians face currency conversion costs and U.S. withholding tax on dividends. Treatment differs across TFSA, RRSP and taxable accounts. This is general education, not tax advice.

VB vs SCHA, how do the funds differ by sector?

VB (Sep 30, 2026): industrials 20.3%, information technology 16.1%, health care 14.1%. SCHA (Nov 6, 2026): financials 18.2%, health care 17.1%, industrials 16.3%.

VB vs SCHA documents and sources

Open the issuer documents before relying on any figure

Third-party sources

StockAnalysis VB · StockAnalysis SCHA.

Methodology and limits

  • VB figures come from Vanguard fund pages and SCHA figures from Schwab fund pages.
  • Dates are shown beside each figure; the issuer documents are linked below.
  • Holdings overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of each ticker held by both funds, using each issuer’s full holdings file: iShares and Schwab files are dated Nov 6, 2026 and Vanguard files Sep 30, 2026. Cash, futures and unmatched tickers are excluded and dates differ for some pairs, so treat it as an estimate.
  • Vanguard figures come from vanguard.com, the Vanguard compare tool and the Sep 30, 2026 fact sheets; iShares figures from ishares.com including the holdings file; Schwab figures from schwabassetmanagement.com and its holdings file; market data (shares, beta, range) from StockAnalysis, dated Nov 9, 2026.
  • Sector labels differ by provider; technology, telecommunications and basic materials were mapped to information technology, communication and materials. The VTWO sector table is calculated from its holdings using iShares Russell 2000 sector labels. Cross-provider gaps are approximate.
  • Figures that were unavailable are left out, and nothing was filled from memory or from another fund.
  • Growth of $10,000 is derived from annualized market price total returns on matched dates; dollar values are approximate.
  • Returns are computed from daily adjusted closing prices (distributions reinvested) so both funds share the same dates (the 10-year figure runs from Dec 30, 2016, 9.9 years); issuer NAV returns, where captured, are shown beside them with their dates.

Educational research, not personalized investment, tax or legal advice, and not a recommendation to buy or sell any fund. Investing involves risk, including loss of principal. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Calculators are hypothetical illustrations. Fund data are provided as published by the sources named and may differ from current figures.