BITB vs HODL ETF comparison

INVEST & COMPOUND · ETF RESEARCHBitcoin ETFs · Comparison · Reviewed November 11, 2026
Invest & Compound · ETF ResearchData: Issuer fund pages, Sep 30 to Nov 10, 2026

BITB vs HODL

Where the fee is nearly the whole story

BITB is the Bitwise fund, a low-fee trust that includes custody costs in its expense ratio, and HODL is the VanEck fund, a low-fee trust with a small share price. Both trusts hold bitcoin and nothing else, so they follow the same price.

What separates them is the fee, the share price, the custodian, the benchmark rate each uses and how heavily each one trades. BITB charges 0.20% and HODL charges 0.20%. This page lines up what backs each share, what each trust costs, how each has performed and how each trades, with the date next to every number.

BITBBitwise Bitcoin ETF
Bitcoin100.0%
HoldsBitcoin
Bitcoin per share0.000542
Expense ratio0.20%
Net assets$2.77B
PaysNo distributions
LaunchedJan 10, 2024
HODLVanEck Bitcoin ETF
Bitcoin100.0%
HoldsBitcoin
Bitcoin per share0.000283
Expense ratio0.20%
Net assets$1.07B
PaysNo distributions
LaunchedJan 4, 2024
!
BITB and HODL both hold bitcoin. The asset is identical, so the comparison comes down to cost, custody and trading.
0.00%Expense ratio gap: BITB 0.20%, HODL 0.20%
100%Overlap by asset held (issuer pages, Nov 2026)
$2.77B / $1.07BNet assets, BITB / HODL (dates differ, see below)
-26.76% / -30.30%1-year NAV return, BITB / HODL (dates differ)
BITB: Bitwise fund page. HODL: VanEck fund page (see Documents and sources). Educational, not advice.
Quick answerUpdated November 11, 2026

BITB vs HODL, the short answer

BITB and HODL hold the same asset. Both trusts hold bitcoin and nothing else, so they follow the same price. What separates them is the fee, the share price, the custodian, the benchmark rate each uses and how heavily each one trades.

Expense ratios are 0.20% and 0.20%, which is $20 and $20 a year per $10,000. NAV total returns, annualized: 1 year BITB -26.76% (to Sep 30, 2026) and HODL -30.30% (to Oct 31, 2026). Neither is better for everyone; the choice turns on cost, trading needs and how much bitcoin risk you want.

CostHODL costs less: 0.20% vs 0.20%$20 a year per $10,000 vs $20
BackingBoth hold bitcoin0.000542 BTC per share vs 0.000283
OverlapSame asset, so 100%by asset held, Nov 2026
Track record1-year NAV: -26.76% vs -30.30%issuer dates differ
Figures from the issuer pages named in the data room, with dates. Educational, not advice.
Fund guidesFull profile of each fund

Want the full picture of one fund before you compare? Read the complete guide for each fund: BITB guide and HODL guide. Each guide covers fees, holdings, yield, returns and taxes.

OverlapBy asset held · issuer pages, Nov 2026

BITB vs HODL overlap, if you own both

100%of the exposure is the same asset

Overlap is normally measured stock by stock. Here there is only one holding: each trust owns bitcoin held by a custodian, so every dollar in BITB and every dollar in HODL is backed by the same asset. Owning both does not diversify anything; it only splits one position across two tickers.

The differences that remain are practical. BITB charges 0.20% and HODL charges 0.20%. One share of BITB is backed by about 0.000542 bitcoin and one share of HODL by about 0.000283, which only changes the share price, not the exposure. The custodian, the benchmark rate and the trading volume also differ, and those are compared below.

BITBHODL
Asset heldBitcoinBitcoin
Bitcoin behind one share0.0005420.000283
Expense ratio0.20%0.20%
CustodianCoinbase Custody Trust Co., LLCNot captured
Net assets$2.77B (Nov 8, 2026)$1.07B (Nov 9, 2026)
Holding both BITB and HODL repeats one position. Pick on fee, custody and trading needs.
Bitcoin per share: BITB NAV divided by the iShares reference price of $74,759.39 (approximate, Bitwise data is dated Nov 8, 2026); HODL issuer figure of 0.283 bitcoin per 1,000 shares, Nov 9, 2026. A gap is marked Not captured. Not advice.
GoalsCharacteristics, not recommendations

BITB vs HODL, one goal, which fund?

FundYour goalWhyThe evidence
HODLLower costLower expense ratioHODL 0.20% vs BITB 0.20% ($20 vs $20 a year per $10,000)
BITBA larger trustMore assetsBITB holds $2.77B against $1.07B for HODL (dates in the table below)
HODLA smaller share priceEasier to buy in small amountsBITB NAV $40.55 vs HODL $21.13 (Nov 2026)
NEITHERReturn comparisonNot matchedThe issuer pages show returns to different dates (BITB to Sep 30, 2026, HODL to Oct 31, 2026), so no winner is named
NEITHERDirect bitcoinBoth hold bitcoinBoth hold bitcoin in custody and neither holds futures or mining stocks
Fund figures from the issuers named in the data room. Examples, not recommendations.
HoldingsWhat backs one share · Nov 2026

BITB vs HODL, where the money goes

BITB · Bitwise Bitcoin ETF

AssetBitcoin, held in custody
Bitcoin behind one share0.000542
Bitcoin behind $10,0000.1338
Share price (NAV, Nov 8, 2026)$40.55
Expense ratio0.20%
LaunchedJan 10, 2024

HODL · VanEck Bitcoin ETF

AssetBitcoin, held in custody
Bitcoin behind one share0.000283
Bitcoin behind $10,0000.1339
Share price (NAV, Nov 9, 2026)$21.13
Expense ratio0.20%
LaunchedJan 4, 2024
A lower share price does not mean cheaper bitcoin: $10,000 buys about 0.1338 bitcoin through BITB and 0.1339 through HODL.
Each trust sells a little bitcoin to pay its fee, so the bitcoin behind a share falls slowly over time. Bitcoin per share is computed as noted in the overlap card. Not advice.
ReturnsAnnualized total returns

BITB vs HODL returns compared on 1-year return and since launch

-26.76%BITB 1-year NAV total return to Sep 30, 2026
-30.30%HODL 1-year NAV total return to Oct 31, 2026
-26.76% vs -30.30%1-year NAV return, BITB vs HODL (dates differ)
1 year BITB -26.76% (to Sep 30, 2026) and HODL -30.30% (to Oct 31, 2026). The two issuers report to different dates, so the gap mixes fund differences with timing.
Dates differ, so no winner is named. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
FeesAs stated by each issuer

BITB vs HODL, what each fund costs a year

$20BITB, per $10,000 · 0.20%
$20HODL, per $10,000 · 0.20%
The fees are 0.20% and 0.20%, so the calculator below shows a difference of $0 a year per $10,000.
BITB expense ratio 0.20% and HODL expense ratio 0.20%, as stated on each issuer page. Illustrative arithmetic, not a forecast.

The data room

Every figure behind the BITB vs HODL cards above, with its source, date and evidence grade. Open the issuer documents before relying on any number.

BITB vs HODL key facts

Evidence grade: Issuer issuer page · Mixed issuer plus provider · 3rd party
MetricBITBHODLGrade and source

Portfolio characteristics

MetricBITBHODLGrade and source

Net assets are dated by fund (BITB $2.77B on Nov 8, 2026; HODL $1.07B on Nov 9, 2026). Figures an issuer page does not show are left out or marked Not captured, not estimated.

BITB vs HODL holdings, what backs each share

Issuer pages · Nov 2026
ItemBITBHODL
What the trust holdsBitcoinBitcoin
Other holdingsNone reported, apart from small cash amounts for expensesNone reported, apart from small cash amounts for expenses
Bitcoin behind one share0.0005420.000283
CustodianCoinbase Custody Trust Co., LLCNot captured
Shares outstanding68.33M50.78M
SponsorBitwiseVanEck
Reference rateNot capturedMarketVector Bitcoin Benchmark Rate

A bitcoin trust has one holding, so there is no top-ten list. Each issuer publishes the bitcoin held for the trust. Custodian and share count are shown where the issuer page lists them, and gaps are marked Not captured.

BITB vs HODL tracking, fund against bitcoin

One-year NAV return, benchmark and market price, issuer pages
PeriodBITB NAVBITB marketBenchmarkHODL NAVHODL marketBenchmark
1 year to Sep 30, 2026-26.76%-27.10%Not captured
1 year to Oct 31, 2026-30.30%-30.20%-30.26%
Implication. A bitcoin trust should trail its benchmark by roughly its fee, plus small timing differences between the benchmark rate and the NAV. The issuer page for BITB did not show a benchmark return, so its tracking gap is Not captured; HODL trailed its benchmark by 0.04 percentage points over one year (to Oct 31, 2026) against a fee of 0.20%.

What you actually own

AssetBoth trusts hold bitcoin and no other asset.Bitcoin
StructureBoth are grantor trusts that issue shares backed by bitcoin. Neither is a registered investment company, and neither holds futures.See prospectuses
Fee mechanicsEach trust sells a small amount of bitcoin to pay its fee, so the bitcoin behind each share declines by about the fee each year.BITB 0.20% · HODL 0.20%
IncomeBitcoin pays no interest or dividends, so neither trust makes regular distributions.No yield

BITB vs HODL performance

Issuer pages, dates differ

All rows come from the issuer pages. The funds are dated differently (BITB Sep 30, 2026, HODL Oct 31, 2026). NAV returns include fees; market price and benchmark returns are shown where the issuer gave them. “Since inception” starts in different months (BITB 2024, HODL 2024). Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Latest returns. Year to date (NAV total return, issuer): BITB -4.26% (to Sep 30, 2026), HODL -14.43% (to Nov 9, 2026). Bitcoin fell over the past year, so recent figures look very different from the since-launch numbers.

Growth of a hypothetical $10,000 · NAV total return, 1 year

Derived from issuer NAV total returns (compounded). Fund expenses are already in NAV. Illustration, not a forecast.

BITB vs HODL yield, dividends and dividend growth

Yield and distribution facts
Yield definitions
MeasureBITBHODL
30-day SEC yieldNoneNone
DistributionsNone paidNone paid
How the fee is paidTrust sells bitcoinTrust sells bitcoin
Fee per $10,000 a year$20$20

BITB and HODL have no yield. Bitcoin earns no interest and pays no dividend, so neither trust distributes income, and the whole return comes from the bitcoin price less the fee. Anyone who needs income from a portfolio has to get it elsewhere or sell shares. See what is dividend yield and yield vs total return.

BITB vs HODL trading and liquidity

Issuer fund pages · Nov 2026
$2.77B / $1.07BNet assets, BITB / HODL (dates differ)
68.33M / 50.78MShares outstanding, BITB / HODL
0.02% / Not captured30-day median bid/ask spread, BITB / HODL
$40.57 / $21.14Closing price, BITB / HODL (Nov 2026)

BITB trades on NYSE Arca and HODL on Cboe BZX. Spreads on the issuer pages were 0.02% for BITB and not captured for HODL, and a spread of 0.02% is about $20 between the buy and sell price on $100,000. Larger trusts usually trade with tighter spreads, which matters more for frequent traders than for long-term holders. Use limit orders for large trades and avoid the first and last minutes of the session. See creation, redemption and trading for how NAV, premiums and spreads arise.

BITB vs HODL expense ratio and fees in dollars

As stated by each issuer
BalanceBITB (0.20%)HODL (0.20%)Gap per year
$10,000$20$20$0
$50,000$100$100$0
$100,000$200$200$0

The expense ratio is taken from the trust by selling bitcoin, not billed to you. Fees exclude the bid/ask spread, any premium or discount to NAV, brokerage commissions and taxes.

BITB vs HODL, what each trust holds and how it is valued

Structure, in plain language

BITB · Not captured

BITB is a grantor trust that holds bitcoin and values it using the Not captured. It was launched in Jan 10, 2024 and charges 0.20%. Custody terms are described in the prospectus and on the issuer page.

HODL · MarketVector Bitcoin Benchmark Rate

HODL is a grantor trust that holds bitcoin and values it using the MarketVector Bitcoin Benchmark Rate. It was launched in Jan 4, 2024 and charges 0.20%. Custody terms are described in the prospectus and on the issuer page.

Custody, valuation and fee terms sit in each prospectus; read them before relying on this summary.

BITB vs HODL, why yield and returns differ

The fee explains most of the gap

Both trusts hold bitcoin and nothing else, so they follow the same price. What separates them is the fee, the share price, the custodian, the benchmark rate each uses and how heavily each one trades.

A bitcoin trust has no manager choosing securities. Its NAV follows a bitcoin reference rate (Not captured for BITB and MarketVector Bitcoin Benchmark Rate for HODL), and the main reason it trails that rate is the fee. That is why the tracking comparison above matters more than any single stretch of returns.

How to decide between BITB and HODL

A step-by-step framework

Start with what separates them: Both trusts hold bitcoin and nothing else, so they follow the same price. What separates them is the fee, the share price, the custodian, the benchmark rate each uses and how heavily each one trades.

  • Step 1 · Asset: both hold bitcoin, so this step is settled.
  • Step 2 · Cost: BITB 0.20% vs HODL 0.20%, or $20 vs $20 a year per $10,000.
  • Step 3 · Trading: if you trade often or use options, the larger trust usually has tighter spreads; if you buy and hold, the fee matters more.
  • Step 4 · What you own: check whether you already hold bitcoin through another fund with the Diversification Calculator.

Size the position against your whole portfolio. Bitcoin pays no income and can fall sharply, so it usually plays a small, deliberate role.

BITB vs HODL for Canadian investors

Currency and account type

BITB and HODL are U.S.-listed and trade in U.S. dollars, so buying them from a Canadian account usually involves converting Canadian dollars, which adds a cost on entry and exit. A move in the U.S. dollar also changes your return in Canadian dollars.

Neither trust pays dividends, so U.S. dividend withholding tax is not the main issue here. Tax on gains depends on the account type and your own situation. Confirm the rules for your account with a tax professional. This is general education, not tax advice.

Risks of BITB and HODL

What can go wrong

Shared risks

  • Bitcoin prices can fall sharply and stay low for long periods; both trusts show one-year NAV declines in the issuer data above.
  • Bitcoin pays no interest or dividends, so the whole return depends on price.
  • Each trust sells bitcoin to pay its fee, so the bitcoin behind each share declines slowly over time.
  • The bitcoin is held by a custodian; see each prospectus for custody, insurance and security terms.

Fund-specific risks

  • BITB and HODL: bitcoin is driven by investor demand, regulation and liquidity, and has swung far more than stocks or gold.
  • BITB: expense ratio 0.20%, net assets $2.77B. HODL: expense ratio 0.20%, net assets $1.07B.
  • Both: not registered investment companies under the Investment Company Act of 1940; see each prospectus.

BITB vs HODL taxes and account placement

General education, not tax advice

In the United States, bitcoin is generally treated as property for tax purposes, and gains on shares of a physically backed trust are generally capital gains: long-term if you held the shares more than a year, short-term (taxed as ordinary income) otherwise. The same general treatment applies to both BITB and HODL, but the details depend on your account and situation.

For Canadian account types, see the Canadian section above. Confirm the rules for your account with a tax professional, and read how to build an ETF portfolio.

Other ETFs people compare

For context, not recommendations

Investors comparing BITB and HODL often also look at the other spot bitcoin trusts in this group: IBIT, FBTC, GBTC, ARKB, BITB and HODL. See the other bitcoin ETFs comparisons, the gold and silver ETFs and the ETF research hub.

BITB vs HODL drawdown arithmetic

What a decline means in dollars
−10%–
−20%–
−30% (illustrative, BITB)–
−30% (illustrative, HODL)–

Recovery gain = decline ÷ (1 − decline). The scenarios use illustrative declines of 10%, 20% and 30% so you can see what a drop does to each fund. Bitcoin has fallen further than this in the past, so they are not a worst-case figure. See the Position Size Calculator.

Tools to compare BITB vs HODL

Static weights from this page
Cost of the fee gap · compounded difference
BITB ending–
HODL ending–
Difference–

Ignores taxes, spreads and holdings differences. ETF Fee Calculator.

Where would your money land?
BITB in bitcoin (100%)–
BITB fee, one year (0.20%)–
BITB fees over 10 years, simple (2.0%)–
HODL in bitcoin (100%)–
HODL fee, one year (0.20%)–
HODL fees over 10 years, simple (2.0%)–

Check shared exposure with the Diversification Calculator.

BITB vs HODL, which fits which job

Characteristics, not recommendations

BITB may suit investors who want…

Bitcoin at a low fee with custody included.

Strengths

  • Larger trust: $2.77B against $1.07B
  • Backed directly by bitcoin
  • Exchange-traded and priced all day

Watch points

  • Higher fee: 0.20% against 0.20%
  • No income
  • Not a complete portfolio

HODL may suit investors who want…

Bitcoin at a low fee and a small share price.

Strengths

  • Backed directly by bitcoin
  • Exchange-traded and priced all day

Watch points

  • Higher fee: 0.20% against 0.20%
  • Smaller trust: $1.07B against $2.77B
  • No income
  • Not a complete portfolio
Neither is a complete portfolio. Both hold a single asset and leave out stocks, bonds and other assets. Start from a core portfolio and size a position inside your allocation. This is general education, not tax or investment advice.

BITB vs HODL investor scenarios

Characteristics that fit, not recommendations
Lowest costWants bitcoin exposure at the lowest annual fee.BITB 0.20% · HODL 0.20%
Active traderTrades often or in size and values tight spreads and deep volume.Check live spreads
Small regular purchasesBuys whole shares in small amounts and prefers a low share price.BITB $40.55 · HODL $21.13
Canadian investorHolds U.S.-listed ETFs in USD and weighs currency cost by account type.Confirm with a tax pro

BITB vs HODL key terms

Plain-language definitions
Grantor trustA trust that holds an asset on behalf of shareholders. Each share represents a slice of the bitcoin.Both funds
CustodianThe firm that holds the trust’s bitcoin in secure storage.Custody
Reference rateA benchmark bitcoin price built from exchange trades, used to value the trust each day.Benchmark
Premium and discountThe gap between the market price and the NAV of a share.Trading
BITB vs HODL at a glance: fees, bitcoin per share, custody and returns for two bitcoin ETFs
BITB vs HODL at a glance, reviewed November 11, 2026

BITB vs HODL, frequently asked questions

Answers use the figures and dates shown above

Is BITB or HODL better?

In the BITB vs HODL question, neither is better for everyone. BITB and HODL hold the same asset. Both trusts hold bitcoin and nothing else, so they follow the same price. What separates them is the fee, the share price, the custodian, the benchmark rate each uses and how heavily each one trades.

Expense ratios are 0.20% and 0.20%, which is $20 and $20 a year per $10,000. NAV total returns, annualized: 1 year BITB -26.76% (to Sep 30, 2026) and HODL -30.30% (to Oct 31, 2026). Neither is better for everyone; the choice turns on cost, trading needs and how much bitcoin risk you want.

BITB vs HODL, what are the expense ratios?

BITB charges 0.20% and HODL charges 0.20%, which is $20 and $20 a year per $10,000.

BITB vs HODL, how much do the funds overlap?

On BITB vs HODL, they overlap completely. BITB and HODL both hold only bitcoin, so owning both repeats one position.

BITB vs HODL, what does each ETF hold?

BITB holds bitcoin valued at the Not captured. HODL holds bitcoin valued at the MarketVector Bitcoin Benchmark Rate. Neither holds futures or mining stocks.

BITB vs HODL, which has performed better?

NAV total returns, annualized: 1 year BITB -26.76% (to Sep 30, 2026) and HODL -30.30% (to Oct 31, 2026). The issuer pages report to different dates, so a winner is not named. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

BITB vs HODL, how closely do they track bitcoin?

The issuer page for BITB did not show a benchmark return, so its tracking gap is Not captured; HODL trailed its benchmark by 0.04 percentage points over one year (to Oct 31, 2026) against a fee of 0.20%.

BITB vs HODL, can I own both?

On BITB vs HODL, you can, but it adds nothing, because both hold bitcoin. One trust is enough for the exposure.

BITB vs HODL, do the funds pay dividends?

On BITB vs HODL, no. BITB and HODL hold bitcoin, which earns no income, so neither pays a dividend or has a yield.

BITB vs HODL, how are gains taxed?

On BITB vs HODL, in the United States, gains on shares of physically backed bitcoin trusts are generally capital gains, long-term after a year. Rules differ by country and account, so confirm with a tax professional. This is general education, not tax advice.

BITB vs HODL, are they suitable for Canadian investors?

On BITB vs HODL, both are U.S.-listed and trade in U.S. dollars, so Canadians face currency conversion costs. Neither pays dividends, so dividend withholding is not the main issue. Treatment of gains differs across TFSA, RRSP and taxable accounts. This is general education, not tax advice.

BITB vs HODL documents and sources

Open the issuer documents before relying on any figure

BITB · Bitwise

HODL · VanEck

Third-party sources

Bitwise BITB fund page · VanEck HODL fund page.

Methodology and limits

  • BITB figures come from the Bitwise fund page and HODL figures from the VanEck fund page.
  • Dates are shown beside each figure; the issuer documents are linked below.
  • Bitcoin per share: BITB uses NAV divided by the iShares reference price of $74,759.39 (approximate, Bitwise data is dated Nov 8, 2026); HODL uses issuer figure of 0.283 bitcoin per 1,000 shares, Nov 9, 2026.
  • Overlap is stated by asset held, because a physically backed trust has a single holding.
  • Tracking gap is the benchmark return minus the NAV return for the same period, both from the issuer page, and is Not captured where no benchmark return was shown.
  • Figures an issuer page does not show are marked Not captured, and nothing was filled from memory or from another fund.
  • Return dates differ between some issuers; where they differ no winner is named.

Educational research, not personalized investment, tax or legal advice, and not a recommendation to buy or sell any fund. Investing involves risk, including loss of principal. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Calculators are hypothetical illustrations. Fund data are provided as published by the sources named and may differ from current figures.