FBTC vs ARKB ETF comparison

INVEST & COMPOUND · ETF RESEARCHBitcoin ETFs · Comparison · Reviewed November 11, 2026
Invest & Compound · ETF ResearchData: Issuer fund pages, Sep 30 to Nov 10, 2026

FBTC vs ARKB

One asset, two wrappers

FBTC is the Fidelity bitcoin fund, the second largest here, holding bitcoin at a 0.25% fee, and ARKB is the ARK 21Shares fund, a mid-sized bitcoin trust sponsored by 21Shares. Both trusts hold bitcoin and nothing else, so they follow the same price.

What separates them is the fee, the share price, the custodian, the benchmark rate each uses and how heavily each one trades. FBTC charges 0.25% and ARKB charges 0.21%. This page lines up what backs each share, what each trust costs, how each has performed and how each trades, with the date next to every number.

FBTCFidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund
Bitcoin100.0%
HoldsBitcoin
Bitcoin per share0.000870
Expense ratio0.25%
Net assets$13.47B
PaysNo distributions
LaunchedJan 10, 2024
ARKBARK 21Shares Bitcoin ETF
Bitcoin100.0%
HoldsBitcoin
Bitcoin per share0.000331
Expense ratio0.21%
Net assets$2.24B
PaysNo distributions
LaunchedJan 10, 2024
!
FBTC and ARKB both hold bitcoin. The asset is identical, so the comparison comes down to cost, custody and trading.
0.04%Expense ratio gap: FBTC 0.25%, ARKB 0.21%
100%Overlap by asset held (issuer pages, Nov 2026)
$13.47B / $2.24BNet assets, FBTC / ARKB (dates differ, see below)
-30.59% / -26.76%1-year NAV return, FBTC / ARKB (dates differ)
FBTC: Fidelity fund page. ARKB: ARK Invest fund page (see Documents and sources). Educational, not advice.
Quick answerUpdated November 11, 2026

FBTC vs ARKB, the short answer

FBTC and ARKB hold the same asset. Both trusts hold bitcoin and nothing else, so they follow the same price. What separates them is the fee, the share price, the custodian, the benchmark rate each uses and how heavily each one trades.

Expense ratios are 0.25% and 0.21%, which is $25 and $21 a year per $10,000. NAV total returns, annualized: 1 year FBTC -30.59% (to Oct 31, 2026) and ARKB -26.76% (to Sep 30, 2026). Neither is better for everyone; the choice turns on cost, trading needs and how much bitcoin risk you want.

CostARKB costs less: 0.21% vs 0.25%$21 a year per $10,000 vs $25
BackingBoth hold bitcoin0.000870 BTC per share vs 0.000331
OverlapSame asset, so 100%by asset held, Nov 2026
Track record1-year NAV: -30.59% vs -26.76%issuer dates differ
Figures from the issuer pages named in the data room, with dates. Educational, not advice.
Fund guidesFull profile of each fund

Want the full picture of one fund before you compare? Read the complete guide for each fund: FBTC guide and ARKB guide. Each guide covers fees, holdings, yield, returns and taxes.

OverlapBy asset held · issuer pages, Nov 2026

FBTC vs ARKB overlap, if you own both

100%of the exposure is the same asset

Overlap is normally measured stock by stock. Here there is only one holding: each trust owns bitcoin held by a custodian, so every dollar in FBTC and every dollar in ARKB is backed by the same asset. Owning both does not diversify anything; it only splits one position across two tickers.

The differences that remain are practical. FBTC charges 0.25% and ARKB charges 0.21%. One share of FBTC is backed by about 0.000870 bitcoin and one share of ARKB by about 0.000331, which only changes the share price, not the exposure. The custodian, the benchmark rate and the trading volume also differ, and those are compared below.

FBTCARKB
Asset heldBitcoinBitcoin
Bitcoin behind one share0.0008700.000331
Expense ratio0.25%0.21%
CustodianNot capturedNot captured
Net assets$13.47B (Oct 31, 2026)$2.24B (Oct 31, 2026)
Holding both FBTC and ARKB repeats one position. Pick on fee, custody and trading needs.
Bitcoin per share: FBTC issuer figure, Nov 9, 2026; ARKB NAV divided by the bitcoin price implied by the FBTC NAV and bitcoin per share, Nov 10, 2026. A gap is marked Not captured. Not advice.
GoalsCharacteristics, not recommendations

FBTC vs ARKB, one goal, which fund?

FundYour goalWhyThe evidence
ARKBLower costLower expense ratioARKB 0.21% vs FBTC 0.25% ($21 vs $25 a year per $10,000)
FBTCA larger trustMore assetsFBTC holds $13.47B against $2.24B for ARKB (dates in the table below)
ARKBA smaller share priceEasier to buy in small amountsFBTC NAV $63.98 vs ARKB $24.37 (Nov 2026)
NEITHERReturn comparisonNot matchedThe issuer pages show returns to different dates (FBTC to Oct 31, 2026, ARKB to Sep 30, 2026), so no winner is named
NEITHERDirect bitcoinBoth hold bitcoinBoth hold bitcoin in custody and neither holds futures or mining stocks
Fund figures from the issuers named in the data room. Examples, not recommendations.
HoldingsWhat backs one share · Nov 2026

FBTC vs ARKB, where the money goes

FBTC · Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund

AssetBitcoin, held in custody
Bitcoin behind one share0.000870
Bitcoin behind $10,0000.1359
Share price (NAV, Nov 10, 2026)$63.98
Expense ratio0.25%
LaunchedJan 10, 2024

ARKB · ARK 21Shares Bitcoin ETF

AssetBitcoin, held in custody
Bitcoin behind one share0.000331
Bitcoin behind $10,0000.1359
Share price (NAV, Nov 10, 2026)$24.37
Expense ratio0.21%
LaunchedJan 10, 2024
A lower share price does not mean cheaper bitcoin: $10,000 buys about 0.1359 bitcoin through FBTC and 0.1359 through ARKB.
Each trust sells a little bitcoin to pay its fee, so the bitcoin behind a share falls slowly over time. Bitcoin per share is computed as noted in the overlap card. Not advice.
ReturnsAnnualized total returns

FBTC vs ARKB returns compared on 1-year return and since launch

-30.59%FBTC 1-year NAV total return to Oct 31, 2026
-26.76%ARKB 1-year NAV total return to Sep 30, 2026
-30.59% vs -26.76%1-year NAV return, FBTC vs ARKB (dates differ)
1 year FBTC -30.59% (to Oct 31, 2026) and ARKB -26.76% (to Sep 30, 2026). The two issuers report to different dates, so the gap mixes fund differences with timing.
Dates differ, so no winner is named. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
FeesAs stated by each issuer

FBTC vs ARKB, what each fund costs a year

$25FBTC, per $10,000 · 0.25%
$21ARKB, per $10,000 · 0.21%
The fees are 0.25% and 0.21%, so the calculator below shows a difference of $4 a year per $10,000.
FBTC expense ratio 0.25% and ARKB expense ratio 0.21%, as stated on each issuer page. Illustrative arithmetic, not a forecast.

The data room

Every figure behind the FBTC vs ARKB cards above, with its source, date and evidence grade. Open the issuer documents before relying on any number.

FBTC vs ARKB key facts

Evidence grade: Issuer issuer page · Mixed issuer plus provider · 3rd party
MetricFBTCARKBGrade and source

Portfolio characteristics

MetricFBTCARKBGrade and source

Net assets are dated by fund (FBTC $13.47B on Oct 31, 2026; ARKB $2.24B on Oct 31, 2026). Figures an issuer page does not show are left out or marked Not captured, not estimated.

FBTC vs ARKB holdings, what backs each share

Issuer pages · Nov 2026
ItemFBTCARKB
What the trust holdsBitcoinBitcoin
Other holdingsNone reported, apart from small cash amounts for expensesNone reported, apart from small cash amounts for expenses
Bitcoin behind one share0.0008700.000331
CustodianNot capturedNot captured
Shares outstanding200.90MNot captured
SponsorFidelity Management & Research21Shares US LLC
Reference rateFidelity Bitcoin Reference RateCME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate – New York Variant

A bitcoin trust has one holding, so there is no top-ten list. Each issuer publishes the bitcoin held for the trust. Custodian and share count are shown where the issuer page lists them, and gaps are marked Not captured.

FBTC vs ARKB tracking, fund against bitcoin

One-year NAV return, benchmark and market price, issuer pages
PeriodFBTC NAVFBTC marketBenchmarkARKB NAVARKB marketBenchmark
1 year to Oct 31, 2026-30.59%-30.29%-29.48%
1 year to Sep 30, 2026-26.76%-27.17%Not captured
Implication. A bitcoin trust should trail its benchmark by roughly its fee, plus small timing differences between the benchmark rate and the NAV. FBTC trailed its benchmark by 1.11 percentage points over one year (to Oct 31, 2026) against a fee of 0.25%; the issuer page for ARKB did not show a benchmark return, so its tracking gap is Not captured.

What you actually own

AssetBoth trusts hold bitcoin and no other asset.Bitcoin
StructureBoth are grantor trusts that issue shares backed by bitcoin. Neither is a registered investment company, and neither holds futures.See prospectuses
Fee mechanicsEach trust sells a small amount of bitcoin to pay its fee, so the bitcoin behind each share declines by about the fee each year.FBTC 0.25% · ARKB 0.21%
IncomeBitcoin pays no interest or dividends, so neither trust makes regular distributions.No yield

FBTC vs ARKB performance

Issuer pages, dates differ

All rows come from the issuer pages. The funds are dated differently (FBTC Oct 31, 2026, ARKB Sep 30, 2026). NAV returns include fees; market price and benchmark returns are shown where the issuer gave them. “Since inception” starts in different months (FBTC 2024, ARKB 2024). Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Latest returns. The issuer page did not show a year-to-date figure for FBTC and ARKB. Bitcoin fell over the past year, so recent figures look very different from the since-launch numbers.

Growth of a hypothetical $10,000 · NAV total return, 1 year

Derived from issuer NAV total returns (compounded). Fund expenses are already in NAV. Illustration, not a forecast.

FBTC vs ARKB yield, dividends and dividend growth

Yield and distribution facts
Yield definitions
MeasureFBTCARKB
30-day SEC yieldNoneNone
DistributionsNone paidNone paid
How the fee is paidTrust sells bitcoinTrust sells bitcoin
Fee per $10,000 a year$25$21

FBTC and ARKB have no yield. Bitcoin earns no interest and pays no dividend, so neither trust distributes income, and the whole return comes from the bitcoin price less the fee. Anyone who needs income from a portfolio has to get it elsewhere or sell shares. See what is dividend yield and yield vs total return.

FBTC vs ARKB trading and liquidity

Issuer fund pages · Nov 2026
$13.47B / $2.24BNet assets, FBTC / ARKB (dates differ)
200.90M / Not capturedShares outstanding, FBTC / ARKB
0.04% / 0.04%30-day median bid/ask spread, FBTC / ARKB
$64.05 / $24.41Closing price, FBTC / ARKB (Nov 2026)

Both trusts trade on Cboe BZX. Spreads on the issuer pages were 0.04% for FBTC and 0.04% for ARKB, and a spread of 0.02% is about $20 between the buy and sell price on $100,000. Larger trusts usually trade with tighter spreads, which matters more for frequent traders than for long-term holders. Use limit orders for large trades and avoid the first and last minutes of the session. See creation, redemption and trading for how NAV, premiums and spreads arise.

FBTC vs ARKB expense ratio and fees in dollars

As stated by each issuer
BalanceFBTC (0.25%)ARKB (0.21%)Gap per year
$10,000$25$21$4
$50,000$125$105$20
$100,000$250$210$40

The expense ratio is taken from the trust by selling bitcoin, not billed to you. Fees exclude the bid/ask spread, any premium or discount to NAV, brokerage commissions and taxes.

FBTC vs ARKB, what each trust holds and how it is valued

Structure, in plain language

FBTC · Fidelity Bitcoin Reference Rate

FBTC is a grantor trust that holds bitcoin and values it using the Fidelity Bitcoin Reference Rate. It was launched in Jan 10, 2024 and charges 0.25%. Custody terms are described in the prospectus and on the issuer page.

ARKB · CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate – New York Variant

ARKB is a grantor trust that holds bitcoin and values it using the CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate – New York Variant. It was launched in Jan 10, 2024 and charges 0.21%. Custody terms are described in the prospectus and on the issuer page.

Custody, valuation and fee terms sit in each prospectus; read them before relying on this summary.

FBTC vs ARKB, why yield and returns differ

The fee explains most of the gap

Both trusts hold bitcoin and nothing else, so they follow the same price. What separates them is the fee, the share price, the custodian, the benchmark rate each uses and how heavily each one trades.

A bitcoin trust has no manager choosing securities. Its NAV follows a bitcoin reference rate (Fidelity Bitcoin Reference Rate for FBTC and CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate – New York Variant for ARKB), and the main reason it trails that rate is the fee. That is why the tracking comparison above matters more than any single stretch of returns.

How to decide between FBTC and ARKB

A step-by-step framework

Start with what separates them: Both trusts hold bitcoin and nothing else, so they follow the same price. What separates them is the fee, the share price, the custodian, the benchmark rate each uses and how heavily each one trades.

  • Step 1 · Asset: both hold bitcoin, so this step is settled.
  • Step 2 · Cost: FBTC 0.25% vs ARKB 0.21%, or $25 vs $21 a year per $10,000.
  • Step 3 · Trading: if you trade often or use options, the larger trust usually has tighter spreads; if you buy and hold, the fee matters more.
  • Step 4 · What you own: check whether you already hold bitcoin through another fund with the Diversification Calculator.

Size the position against your whole portfolio. Bitcoin pays no income and can fall sharply, so it usually plays a small, deliberate role.

FBTC vs ARKB for Canadian investors

Currency and account type

FBTC and ARKB are U.S.-listed and trade in U.S. dollars, so buying them from a Canadian account usually involves converting Canadian dollars, which adds a cost on entry and exit. A move in the U.S. dollar also changes your return in Canadian dollars.

Neither trust pays dividends, so U.S. dividend withholding tax is not the main issue here. Tax on gains depends on the account type and your own situation. Confirm the rules for your account with a tax professional. This is general education, not tax advice.

Risks of FBTC and ARKB

What can go wrong

Shared risks

  • Bitcoin prices can fall sharply and stay low for long periods; both trusts show one-year NAV declines in the issuer data above.
  • Bitcoin pays no interest or dividends, so the whole return depends on price.
  • Each trust sells bitcoin to pay its fee, so the bitcoin behind each share declines slowly over time.
  • The bitcoin is held by a custodian; see each prospectus for custody, insurance and security terms.

Fund-specific risks

  • FBTC and ARKB: bitcoin is driven by investor demand, regulation and liquidity, and has swung far more than stocks or gold.
  • FBTC: expense ratio 0.25%, net assets $13.47B. ARKB: expense ratio 0.21%, net assets $2.24B.
  • Both: not registered investment companies under the Investment Company Act of 1940; see each prospectus.

FBTC vs ARKB taxes and account placement

General education, not tax advice

In the United States, bitcoin is generally treated as property for tax purposes, and gains on shares of a physically backed trust are generally capital gains: long-term if you held the shares more than a year, short-term (taxed as ordinary income) otherwise. The same general treatment applies to both FBTC and ARKB, but the details depend on your account and situation.

For Canadian account types, see the Canadian section above. Confirm the rules for your account with a tax professional, and read how to build an ETF portfolio.

Other ETFs people compare

For context, not recommendations

Investors comparing FBTC and ARKB often also look at the other spot bitcoin trusts in this group: IBIT, FBTC, GBTC, ARKB, BITB and HODL. See the other bitcoin ETFs comparisons, the gold and silver ETFs and the ETF research hub.

FBTC vs ARKB drawdown arithmetic

What a decline means in dollars
−10%–
−20%–
−30% (illustrative, FBTC)–
−30% (illustrative, ARKB)–

Recovery gain = decline ÷ (1 − decline). The scenarios use illustrative declines of 10%, 20% and 30% so you can see what a drop does to each fund. Bitcoin has fallen further than this in the past, so they are not a worst-case figure. See the Position Size Calculator.

Tools to compare FBTC vs ARKB

Static weights from this page
Cost of the fee gap · compounded difference
FBTC ending–
ARKB ending–
Difference–

Ignores taxes, spreads and holdings differences. ETF Fee Calculator.

Where would your money land?
FBTC in bitcoin (100%)–
FBTC fee, one year (0.25%)–
FBTC fees over 10 years, simple (2.5%)–
ARKB in bitcoin (100%)–
ARKB fee, one year (0.21%)–
ARKB fees over 10 years, simple (2.1%)–

Check shared exposure with the Diversification Calculator.

FBTC vs ARKB, which fits which job

Characteristics, not recommendations

FBTC may suit investors who want…

A large, low-fee bitcoin trust from a major brokerage.

Strengths

  • Larger trust: $13.47B against $2.24B
  • Backed directly by bitcoin
  • Exchange-traded and priced all day

Watch points

  • Higher fee: 0.25% against 0.21%
  • No income
  • Not a complete portfolio

ARKB may suit investors who want…

A mid-sized bitcoin trust at a low fee.

Strengths

  • Lower fee: 0.21% against 0.25%
  • Backed directly by bitcoin
  • Exchange-traded and priced all day

Watch points

  • Smaller trust: $2.24B against $13.47B
  • No income
  • Not a complete portfolio
Neither is a complete portfolio. Both hold a single asset and leave out stocks, bonds and other assets. Start from a core portfolio and size a position inside your allocation. This is general education, not tax or investment advice.

FBTC vs ARKB investor scenarios

Characteristics that fit, not recommendations
Lowest costWants bitcoin exposure at the lowest annual fee.FBTC 0.25% · ARKB 0.21%
Active traderTrades often or in size and values tight spreads and deep volume.Check live spreads
Small regular purchasesBuys whole shares in small amounts and prefers a low share price.FBTC $63.98 · ARKB $24.37
Canadian investorHolds U.S.-listed ETFs in USD and weighs currency cost by account type.Confirm with a tax pro

FBTC vs ARKB key terms

Plain-language definitions
Grantor trustA trust that holds an asset on behalf of shareholders. Each share represents a slice of the bitcoin.Both funds
CustodianThe firm that holds the trust’s bitcoin in secure storage.Custody
Reference rateA benchmark bitcoin price built from exchange trades, used to value the trust each day.Benchmark
Premium and discountThe gap between the market price and the NAV of a share.Trading
FBTC vs ARKB at a glance: fees, bitcoin per share, custody and returns for two bitcoin ETFs
FBTC vs ARKB at a glance, reviewed November 11, 2026

FBTC vs ARKB, frequently asked questions

Answers use the figures and dates shown above

Is FBTC or ARKB better?

In the FBTC vs ARKB question, neither is better for everyone. FBTC and ARKB hold the same asset. Both trusts hold bitcoin and nothing else, so they follow the same price. What separates them is the fee, the share price, the custodian, the benchmark rate each uses and how heavily each one trades.

Expense ratios are 0.25% and 0.21%, which is $25 and $21 a year per $10,000. NAV total returns, annualized: 1 year FBTC -30.59% (to Oct 31, 2026) and ARKB -26.76% (to Sep 30, 2026). Neither is better for everyone; the choice turns on cost, trading needs and how much bitcoin risk you want.

FBTC vs ARKB, what are the expense ratios?

FBTC charges 0.25% and ARKB charges 0.21%, which is $25 and $21 a year per $10,000.

FBTC vs ARKB, how much do the funds overlap?

On FBTC vs ARKB, they overlap completely. FBTC and ARKB both hold only bitcoin, so owning both repeats one position.

FBTC vs ARKB, what does each ETF hold?

FBTC holds bitcoin valued at the Fidelity Bitcoin Reference Rate. ARKB holds bitcoin valued at the CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate – New York Variant. Neither holds futures or mining stocks.

FBTC vs ARKB, which has performed better?

NAV total returns, annualized: 1 year FBTC -30.59% (to Oct 31, 2026) and ARKB -26.76% (to Sep 30, 2026). The issuer pages report to different dates, so a winner is not named. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

FBTC vs ARKB, how closely do they track bitcoin?

FBTC trailed its benchmark by 1.11 percentage points over one year (to Oct 31, 2026) against a fee of 0.25%; the issuer page for ARKB did not show a benchmark return, so its tracking gap is Not captured.

FBTC vs ARKB, can I own both?

On FBTC vs ARKB, you can, but it adds nothing, because both hold bitcoin. One trust is enough for the exposure.

FBTC vs ARKB, do the funds pay dividends?

On FBTC vs ARKB, no. FBTC and ARKB hold bitcoin, which earns no income, so neither pays a dividend or has a yield.

FBTC vs ARKB, how are gains taxed?

On FBTC vs ARKB, in the United States, gains on shares of physically backed bitcoin trusts are generally capital gains, long-term after a year. Rules differ by country and account, so confirm with a tax professional. This is general education, not tax advice.

FBTC vs ARKB, are they suitable for Canadian investors?

On FBTC vs ARKB, both are U.S.-listed and trade in U.S. dollars, so Canadians face currency conversion costs. Neither pays dividends, so dividend withholding is not the main issue. Treatment of gains differs across TFSA, RRSP and taxable accounts. This is general education, not tax advice.

FBTC vs ARKB documents and sources

Open the issuer documents before relying on any figure

FBTC · Fidelity

ARKB · ARK Invest

Third-party sources

Fidelity FBTC fund page · ARK Invest ARKB fund page.

Methodology and limits

  • FBTC figures come from the Fidelity fund page and ARKB figures from the ARK Invest fund page.
  • Dates are shown beside each figure; the issuer documents are linked below.
  • Bitcoin per share: FBTC uses issuer figure, Nov 9, 2026; ARKB uses NAV divided by the bitcoin price implied by the FBTC NAV and bitcoin per share, Nov 10, 2026.
  • Overlap is stated by asset held, because a physically backed trust has a single holding.
  • Tracking gap is the benchmark return minus the NAV return for the same period, both from the issuer page, and is Not captured where no benchmark return was shown.
  • Figures an issuer page does not show are marked Not captured, and nothing was filled from memory or from another fund.
  • Return dates differ between some issuers; where they differ no winner is named.

Educational research, not personalized investment, tax or legal advice, and not a recommendation to buy or sell any fund. Investing involves risk, including loss of principal. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Calculators are hypothetical illustrations. Fund data are provided as published by the sources named and may differ from current figures.