IXC vs RSPG

Portfolio characteristics

Net assets are for the ETF share class on different dates (IXC $2.73B; RSPG $575.47M), so they are not matched. Figures that were not available are left out rather than estimated.

Top ten sums: IXC 60.8% · RSPG 48.6%. 6 shared top-ten stocks. Weights change.

The sector mirror

Same funds, different lenses

Company size

Both hold energy companies. IXC holds 50 stocks and RSPG holds 22.

What you actually own

The first rows are market price total returns computed on the same dates for both funds (to Nov 9, 2026), so they compare like for like. The 10-year figure runs from the December 2016 monthly price (about 9.9 years). The issuer NAV rows are dated separately (IXC to Sep 30, 2026, RSPG to Sep 30, 2026) and include the since-inception figures. “Since inception” starts in different years (IXC 2001, RSPG 2006). Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Growth of a hypothetical $10,000 · Market price total return, both to Nov 9, 2026

Both funds derived from annualized market price total returns on matched dates (compounded). Distributions reinvested; fund expenses are already in the price. Illustration, not a forecast.

Paid per share, last 12 months vs the 12 months before

Payouts are listed by ex-dividend date. Energy funds pay uneven distributions, so the like-for-like comparison is the total paid over the last 12 months against the 12 months before (cards above: IXC $1.572 per share, RSPG $2.069 per share). Payouts move with oil and gas profits and not only with price. See yield vs total return.

Rank by rank, the ten largest positions of each fund. Top five: IXC 46.4%, RSPG 24.8%. Top ten: IXC 60.8%, RSPG 48.6%.

Large funds like these usually trade with small spreads, but check the live spread before you trade. A spread of 0.01% is about $10 between the buy and sell price on $100,000, so check the live quote. Energy shares can swing sharply when oil prices move, so spreads can widen on volatile days. Use limit orders for large trades and avoid the first and last minutes of the session. See creation, redemption and trading for how NAV, premiums and spreads arise.

Expense ratio is taken from fund assets, not billed. It excludes the bid/ask spread, any premium or discount to NAV, brokerage commissions, and taxes.

Exact eligibility rules, caps and rebalance dates sit in each prospectus and index methodology; read them before relying on this summary.

The two funds follow different indexes. The S&P Global 1200 Energy Index is a global energy index, so it holds U.S. giants plus Shell, TotalEnergies, BP, Equinor, Enbridge and other foreign companies. The S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy Plus Index gives each of about two dozen S&P 500 energy stocks a similar weight, so Exxon and Chevron are no bigger than a small producer.

IXC follows the S&P Global 1200 Energy Index and RSPG follows the S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy Plus Index. Because each index sets its own rules, the funds hold different numbers of stocks (50 against 22) and different mixes of businesses such as integrated majors, producers, refiners, pipelines and oilfield services. Over any window the results can diverge in either direction, and the gap comes mostly from what each index holds and when it rebalances, not from fees.

Start with what separates them: The two funds follow different indexes. The S&P Global 1200 Energy Index is a global energy index, so it holds U.S. giants plus Shell, TotalEnergies, BP, Equinor, Enbridge and other foreign companies.

The S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy Plus Index gives each of about two dozen S&P 500 energy stocks a similar weight, so Exxon and Chevron are no bigger than a small producer. Then check what you already own: the funds overlap by 41.2%, so holding both is a real decision about how much of each market you want.

• Step 1 · Market: IXC holds the largest energy companies in the world, including Shell, TotalEnergies and BP, from the S&P Global 1200 Energy Index; RSPG holds about two dozen S&P 500 energy stocks at roughly equal weights.
• Step 2 · Cost: IXC 0.37% vs RSPG 0.4%.
• Step 3 · Concentration: ten largest positions 60.8% vs 48.6%.
• Step 4 · Overlap: use the Diversification Calculator against what you own.

Size the position against your whole portfolio, including any U.S. stock fund you hold, because broad stock funds already hold Exxon and Chevron.

IXC and RSPG are U.S.-listed and trade in U.S. dollars, so buying them from a Canadian account usually involves converting Canadian dollars, which adds a cost on both entry and exit. Because the funds hold U.S. companies, a move in the U.S. dollar also changes your return in Canadian dollars.

U.S. dividends paid to Canadian residents are generally subject to U.S. withholding tax under the tax treaty; the treaty exemption usually applies inside an RRSP, while a TFSA is not exempt. Rules depend on the fund and the account, so confirm them with a tax professional. This is general education, not tax advice.

Both funds invest in energy companies. Most dividends from U.S. energy companies can be qualified dividends, but the share depends on the fund and on how long you hold it. Check each fund’s tax documents for the split. Funds that hold foreign companies such as IXC can pass through foreign tax credits or withholding.

For Canadian account types and withholding tax, see the Canadian section above. Confirm the rules for your account with a tax professional, and read how to build an ETF portfolio.

Investors comparing IXC and RSPG often also look at the other energy funds in this group: XLE, VDE, IYE, IXC, FENY and RSPG. See the other energy ETFs comparisons and the ETF research hub.

Is IXC or RSPG better?

In the IXC vs RSPG question, neither is better for everyone. IXC and RSPG differ in what they hold and what they charge. The two funds follow different indexes. The S&P Global 1200 Energy Index is a global energy index, so it holds U.S. giants plus Shell, TotalEnergies, BP, Equinor, Enbridge and other foreign companies.

The S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy Plus Index gives each of about two dozen S&P 500 energy stocks a similar weight, so Exxon and Chevron are no bigger than a small producer. Expense ratios are 0.37% and 0.4%. Market price total returns, annualized (both to Nov 9, 2026): 1 year 39.40% vs 36.05%; 3 years 18.25% vs 16.59%; 5 years 18.80% vs 18.99%; 10 years 9.39% vs 8.13%. Neither is better for everyone; the choice turns on cost, which markets you want, and what you already own.

IXC vs RSPG, what are the expense ratios?

IXC charges 0.37% and RSPG charges 0.4%, which is $37 and $40 a year per $10,000.

IXC vs RSPG, how much do the funds overlap?

About 41.2% of the weight is held by both funds, matched by ticker in full holdings files dated Nov 9, 2026. 6 stocks appear in both top-ten lists.

IXC vs RSPG, what does each ETF track?

IXC tracks the S&P Global 1200 Energy Index. RSPG tracks the S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy Plus Index.

IXC vs RSPG, what are the top holdings?

IXC (Nov 9, 2026): ExxonMobil 18.26%, Chevron 11.22%, Shell 7.73%, TotalEnergies 4.83%, ConocoPhillips 4.35%. RSPG (Nov 9, 2026): EOG Resources 5.02%, ExxonMobil 4.99%, APA Corp 4.97%, Chevron 4.91%, ConocoPhillips 4.9%.

IXC vs RSPG, which has performed better?

Market price total returns, annualized (both to Nov 9, 2026): 1 year 39.40% vs 36.05%; 3 years 18.25% vs 16.59%; 5 years 18.80% vs 18.99%; 10 years 9.39% vs 8.13%. Returns depend on what each fund holds, and past performance does not guarantee future results.

IXC vs RSPG, can I own both?

On IXC vs RSPG, you can, but they overlap by about 41.2%. 6 top-ten stocks are shared. The funds overlap only partly, so owning both is a real choice about how much of each market you want.

IXC vs RSPG, how often do the funds pay dividends?

IXC pays semi-annual and RSPG pays quarterly. Trailing yields are 2.56% and 1.86%; check each issuer page for the schedule.

IXC vs RSPG, are they suitable for Canadian investors?

On IXC vs RSPG, both are U.S.-listed and trade in U.S. dollars, so Canadians face currency conversion costs and U.S. withholding tax on dividends. Treatment differs across TFSA, RRSP and taxable accounts. This is general education, not tax advice.

IXC vs RSPG, how do the funds differ by sector?

IXC (Nov 9, 2026): integrated oil and gas 56.9%, exploration and production 16.6%, midstream 12.2%. RSPG (Nov 9, 2026): exploration and production 40.8%, midstream 18.5%, equipment and services 16.5%.

Third-party sources

StockAnalysis IXC · StockAnalysis RSPG.

Methodology and limits

• IXC figures come from iShares fund pages and RSPG figures from Invesco fund pages.
• Dates are shown beside each figure; the issuer documents are linked below.
• Holdings overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of each ticker held by both funds, using each issuer’s full holdings file. Holdings dates are Nov 9, 2026. Cash, futures and unmatched tickers are excluded and dates differ for some pairs, so treat it as an estimate. IXC holds non-U.S. companies such as Shell, TotalEnergies, BP and Equinor that the U.S.-only funds do not hold, which lowers its overlap with them. Shares listed under different tickers on two exchanges are matched to the U.S. ticker where one exists.
• State Street figures come from the XLE holdings file and fact sheet; iShares figures from the IYE and IXC holdings files, fact sheets and summary prospectuses; Fidelity figures from the FENY holdings list, fact sheet and summary prospectus; Invesco figures from the RSPG holdings file, fact sheet and prospectus; Vanguard figures from the VDE fact sheet and summary prospectus; market data (shares, beta, range) from StockAnalysis, dated Nov 9, 2026.
• Sector groups on this page use one business-type scheme applied to every fund: each stock is placed in a group such as integrated oil and gas, exploration and production, refining and marketing, midstream pipelines, equipment and services, or coal, uranium and other, and the weights are added up from the full holdings. This lets the funds be compared on the same labels, but it will not match each issuer’s own sector table exactly.
• Figures that were unavailable are left out, and nothing was filled from memory or from another fund.
• Growth of $10,000 is derived from annualized market price total returns on matched dates; dollar values are approximate.
• Returns are computed from daily adjusted closing prices (distributions reinvested) so both funds share the same dates (the 10-year figure runs from the December 2016 monthly price, about 9.9 years); issuer NAV returns, where captured, are shown beside them with their dates. Standard deviation is computed from 36 monthly total returns, Nov 2023 to Oct 2026, the same way for every fund.

Pathways, not rankings or recommendations.