PDBC vs COMT ETF comparison

INVEST & COMPOUND · ETF RESEARCHCommodity ETFs · Comparison · Reviewed November 9, 2026
Invest & Compound · ETF ResearchData: Issuer fund pages, Sep 30 to Nov 9, 2026

PDBC vs COMT

Close cousins in the commodity market

PDBC is actively managed and holds futures on the same 27 commodities as DBC, plus swaps, Treasury securities and other short-term holdings, through a Cayman subsidiary, and COMT holds S&P GSCI futures chosen for the best roll yield, plus cash and short-term notes. The two funds follow different indexes. The DBIQ Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Index Excess Return (benchmark, actively managed) follows the same 27-commodity universe as DBC but is actively managed, so it can choose contracts and hold Treasury securities, swaps and notes for extra return.

The S&P GSCI Dynamic Roll Index follows the S&P GSCI but chooses which contract month to hold using roll yield, so it holds the GSCI mix with a different roll rule. PDBC charges 0.59% and COMT charges 0.48%. This page lines up what each fund holds by commodity, how much they overlap, what each paid and how each performed, with the date next to every number.

PDBCInvesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF
Energy56.7%Agriculture16.0%Industrial metals10.8%Precious metals10.1%Livestock6.3%
HoldsFutures on 27 commodities
Ten largest commodities77.3%
Expense ratio0.59%
Net assets$7.4B
PaysAnnual
Launched2014
COMTiShares GSCI Commodity Dynamic Roll Strategy ETF
Energy56.0%Agriculture14.0%Industrial metals12.7%Precious metals8.7%Livestock8.6%
HoldsFutures on 24 commodities
Ten largest commodities80.6%
Expense ratio0.48%
Net assets$1.29B
PaysAnnual
Launched2014
!
PDBC and COMT each have exposure to 27 commodities. 91.3% of the weight is shared by commodity in the fund holdings (Oct 31, 2026 and Nov 9, 2026).
0.11%Expense ratio gap: PDBC 0.59%, COMT 0.48%
91.3%Overlap by commodity (issuer holdings, Oct 31, 2026 and Nov 9, 2026)
77.3% / 80.6%Ten largest commodities, PDBC / COMT
n/aReturn dates differ, so no leader is named
PDBC: Invesco fund pages (see Documents and sources). COMT: BlackRock (iShares) fund pages (see Documents and sources). Educational, not advice.
Quick answerUpdated November 9, 2026

PDBC vs COMT, the short answer

PDBC and COMT differ in what they hold and what they charge. The two funds follow different indexes. The DBIQ Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Index Excess Return (benchmark, actively managed) follows the same 27-commodity universe as DBC but is actively managed, so it can choose contracts and hold Treasury securities, swaps and notes for extra return.

The S&P GSCI Dynamic Roll Index follows the S&P GSCI but chooses which contract month to hold using roll yield, so it holds the GSCI mix with a different roll rule. Expense ratios are 0.59% and 0.48%. NAV total returns, annualized (PDBC to Oct 31, 2026, COMT to Sep 30, 2026): 1 year 53.50% vs 48.38%; 3 years 15.74% vs 14.56%; 5 years 12.45% vs 13.55%; 10 years 10.00% vs 9.63%. Neither is better for everyone; the choice turns on cost, tax form (K-1 or 1099), and what you already own.

CostCOMT costs less: 0.48% vs 0.59%$59 a year per $10,000 vs $48
Holdings27 commodities eachTen largest 77.3% vs 80.6%
Overlap91.3% of the exposure is sharedby commodity, issuer holdings, Oct 31, 2026 and Nov 9, 2026
Track recordDates differ, so no leader is named.1 year 53.50% vs 48.38% (1 year)
Figures from the issuer pages named in the data room, with dates. Educational, not advice.
OverlapTop-ten lists · weights as of the dates shown

PDBC vs COMT overlap, if you own both

91.3%of the exposure shared by commodity (Oct 31, 2026 and Nov 9, 2026) · 9 shared top-ten commodities

PDBC · ten largest holdings

As of Oct 31, 2026
  1. 1Brent crude CO21.12%Both
  2. 2WTI crude CL17.38%Both
  3. 3Gold GC8.02%Both
  4. 4Gasoil QS6.63%Both
  5. 5Heating oil HO5.67%Both
  6. 6Copper HG5.35%Both
  7. 7Gasoline XB3.97%Both
  8. 8Soybeans S3.19%Only here
  9. 9Live cattle LC3.04%Both
  10. 10Corn C2.98%Both

Ten largest total 77.4%

COMT · ten largest holdings

As of Nov 9, 2026
  1. 1Brent crude CO19.07%Both
  2. 2WTI crude CL18.07%Both
  3. 3Gold GC7.92%Both
  4. 4Gasoil QS7.90%Both
  5. 5Copper HG6.47%Both
  6. 6Heating oil HO5.38%Both
  7. 7Live cattle LC4.47%Both
  8. 8Aluminum LA4.00%Only here
  9. 9Corn C3.98%Both
  10. 10Gasoline XB3.38%Both

Ten largest total 80.6%

Shared by both · 9 commodities

CommodityPDBC weightCOMT weightGap
Brent crude CO21.12%19.07%+2.05 pts
WTI crude CL17.38%18.07%-0.69 pts
Gold GC8.02%7.92%+0.10 pts
Gasoil QS6.63%7.90%-1.27 pts
Heating oil HO5.67%5.38%+0.29 pts
Copper HG5.35%6.47%-1.12 pts
Gasoline XB3.97%3.38%+0.59 pts
Live cattle LC3.04%4.47%-1.43 pts
Corn C2.98%3.98%-1.00 pts

Only in PDBC’s top ten: Soybeans. Only in COMT’s top ten: Aluminum.

In PDBC’s top ten
In COMT’s top ten
91.3%
of the exposure shared by commodity (Oct 31, 2026 and Nov 9, 2026) · 9 shared top-ten commodities
Biggest sector gaps: livestock is 6.3% of PDBC but 8.6% of COMT; agriculture is 16.0% of PDBC but 14.0% of COMT

The twist

Overlap (commodity)
91.3%
Sector overlap (this page)
95.9%
Top-ten weight, PDBC
77.3%
Top-ten weight, COMT
80.6%

91.3% of the exposure sits in commodities both funds hold (matched by commodity, issuer holdings dated Oct 31, 2026 and Nov 9, 2026), and 9 commodities appear in both top-ten lists. Holding both adds almost no diversification: you are paying for two wrappers around nearly the same basket of commodities.

Top-ten lists: PDBC Oct 31, 2026, COMT Nov 9, 2026. Sector tables: PDBC Oct 31, 2026, COMT Nov 9, 2026. Overlap: sum of the smaller weight of each commodity held by both funds, using each issuer’s published holdings or exposure (Oct 31, 2026 and Nov 9, 2026); the dates differ for some pairs, so treat it as an estimate. Weights are shares of each fund’s futures exposure by underlying commodity, so Treasury bills, cash and collateral are excluded. PDBC weights are the prior month-end commodity exposure published by Invesco (Oct 31, 2026). COMT weights are each commodity’s share of futures notional value in the iShares holdings file of Nov 9, 2026. Invesco groups livestock with agriculture in its PDBC sector chart; this page shows it separately. Not advice.
GoalsCharacteristics, not recommendations

PDBC vs COMT, one goal, which fund?

FundYour goalWhyThe evidence
COMTLower costLower expense ratioCOMT 0.48% vs PDBC 0.59% ($48 vs $59 a year per $10,000)
PDBCBroader coverageMore commoditiesPDBC covers 27 commodities; COMT covers 24
PDBCA flatter top tenLess weight in the largest commoditiesTen largest: PDBC 77.3% vs COMT 80.6% (Oct 31, 2026 vs Nov 9, 2026 dates)
NEITHERCommodity exposureBoth hold commodity futuresBoth hold futures on oil, metals and farm products and both rise and fall with commodity prices
Fund figures from the issuers named in the data room. Examples, not recommendations.
HoldingsFive largest · full top-ten tables in the data room

PDBC vs COMT, where the money goes

PDBC · Invesco, Oct 31, 2026

COMT · BlackRock (iShares), Nov 9, 2026

Concentration: PDBC ten largest commodities total 77.3% and COMT total 80.6%.
Top ten as listed by each issuer on the dates shown. Weights move with prices. Not advice.
ReturnsAnnualized total returns, matched dates

PDBC vs COMT returns compared over 1, 3, 5 and 10 years

+53.50%PDBC 1-year NAV total return to Oct 31, 2026
+48.38%COMT 1-year total return to Sep 30, 2026
10.00% vs 9.63%10 years annualized NAV total return, PDBC vs COMT (PDBC to Oct 31, 2026, COMT to Sep 30, 2026)
1 year 53.50% vs 48.38%; 3 years 15.74% vs 14.56%; 5 years 12.45% vs 13.55%; 10 years 10.00% vs 9.63%. Return dates differ between the two funds, so compare the table with care.
Return dates are not matched (PDBC to Oct 31, 2026, COMT to Sep 30, 2026). No leader is named. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
FeesAs stated by each issuer

PDBC vs COMT, what each fund costs a year

$59PDBC, per $10,000 · 0.59%
$48COMT, per $10,000 · 0.48%
The fees are 0.59% and 0.48%, so the calculator below shows a difference of $11.00 a year per $10,000.
PDBC net expense ratio 0.59% (issuer; total 0.74% with 0.15% acquired fund fees). COMT net expense ratio 0.48% (issuer; gross 0.49%, net 0.48% after a 0.01% waiver). Illustrative arithmetic, not a forecast.

The data room

Every figure behind the PDBC vs COMT cards above, with its source, date and evidence grade. Open the issuer documents before relying on any number.

PDBC vs COMT key facts

Evidence grade: Issuer issuer page · Mixed issuer plus provider · 3rd party
MetricPDBCCOMTGrade and source

Portfolio characteristics

MetricPDBCCOMTGrade and source

Net assets are dated Nov 9, 2026 for both funds (PDBC $7.4B; COMT $1.29B). Figures that the issuers do not publish, such as beta, standard deviation and 52-week range, are left as Not captured rather than estimated.

PDBC vs COMT holdings and top ten

Click a commodity tile · PDBC: Invesco, Oct 31, 2026 · COMT: BlackRock (iShares), Nov 9, 2026
EnergyAgriculturePrecious metalsIndustrial metalsLivestock
Select a tile
Tile area is proportional to weight.
PDBC
#CommodityWeight
COMT
#CommodityWeight

Top ten sums: PDBC 77.3% · COMT 80.6%. 9 shared top-ten commodities. Weights change.

PDBC vs COMT sector exposure

PDBC: Oct 31, 2026 · COMT: Nov 9, 2026
PDBC
COMT
Implication. PDBC is led by energy 56.7%, agriculture 16.0%, industrial metals 10.8%. COMT is led by energy 56.0%, agriculture 14.0%, industrial metals 12.7%. Livestock is shown as its own group here.

The sector mirror

PDBCCOMT
Implication. Sector gaps: energy is 56.7% of PDBC and 56.0% of COMT; agriculture is 16.0% and 14.0%; precious metals 10.1% and 8.7% (Oct 31, 2026 vs Nov 9, 2026). Weights are shares of futures exposure, excluding collateral.

Same funds, different lenses

Implication. Energy, farm products, industrial metals, precious metals and livestock are the five groups used for every commodity fund on this site, so the funds compare on the same labels.

Contracts and collateral

Both funds hold futures contracts, not physical commodities. PDBC lists 27 commodities and COMT lists 24. Each contract expires and is replaced (rolled) before it ends, and the cash backing the contracts sits in Treasury bills, money market funds and similar holdings. That collateral earns interest and is not counted in the commodity weights here.

What you actually own

IndexPDBC tracks the DBIQ Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Index Excess Return (benchmark, actively managed). COMT uses the S&P GSCI Dynamic Roll Index as its benchmark.PDBC · COMT
CommoditiesPDBC and COMT each hold exposure to 27 commodities across energy, farm products and metals.Top ten 77.3% vs 80.6%
StructureBoth hold futures, collateral and cash rather than physical commodities. PDBC issues a 1099 and COMT issues a 1099.See prospectuses
ManagementPDBC is actively managed against its benchmark. COMT follows its index rules.Passive vs active

PDBC vs COMT performance

Matched dates, PDBC to Oct 31, 2026, COMT to Sep 30, 2026; issuer NAV rows dated separately

Return rows come from the issuer pages and are dated Oct 31, 2026 for PDBC and Sep 30, 2026 for COMT, so they are not matched and no return leader is named. NAV returns include fees; market price and benchmark returns are shown beside them where the issuer published them, and gaps are marked Not captured. “Since inception” starts in different years (PDBC 2014, COMT 2014). Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Latest returns. Year to date (NAV total return, issuer, dates differ): PDBC +51.51% (Jan 1 to Oct 31, 2026), COMT +44.63% (to Nov 6, 2026).

Growth of a hypothetical $10,000 · NAV total return, PDBC to Oct 31, 2026, COMT to Sep 30, 2026

Both funds derived from issuer NAV total returns on matched dates (compounded). Distributions reinvested; fund expenses are already in NAV. Illustration, not a forecast.

PDBC vs COMT yield, dividends and dividend growth

Yield and distribution facts
Yield definitions
MeasurePDBCCOMT
30-day SEC yield2.90% (Nov 6, 2026)Not reported
Trailing 12-month2.71% 12-month distribution rate (Nov 6, 2026)Not captured
Paid, last 12 months$0.509 per shareNot captured
FrequencyAnnualAnnual

Distribution frequency: PDBC annual, COMT annual. Per-share payouts differ because share prices differ, so compare yields rather than dollars. Payouts depend on Treasury interest earned on collateral and on how each fund is structured, and some payouts are classed as return of capital. Payouts captured: PDBC 2, COMT 0; gaps are marked Not captured. See what is dividend yield and yield vs total return.

PDBC vs COMT concentration and overlap

Ten largest positions · shared holdings
9Shared top-ten commodities
91.3%Overlap · by commodity
58.8% / 59.4%Top five, PDBC / COMT
21.1%Largest single commodity

Rank by rank, the ten largest commodities of each fund, as a share of futures exposure. Top five: PDBC 58.8%, COMT 59.4%. Top ten: PDBC 77.3%, COMT 80.6%.

Implication. The lists share 9 commodities, so owning both repeats some of the same bets. Largest commodity: PDBC Brent crude (21.12%), COMT Brent crude (19.07%).

PDBC vs COMT trading and liquidity

Issuer fund pages · Nov 9, 2026
$7.4B / $1.29BNet assets, PDBC / COMT (Nov 9, 2026)
400.75M / Not capturedShares outstanding, PDBC / COMT
0.05% / 0.25%Median bid/ask spread, PDBC / COMT
Nasdaq / NASDAQExchange listing, PDBC / COMT

The issuers report bid/ask spreads of 0.05% for PDBC and 0.25% for COMT (measures differ by issuer; see each fund page). A spread of 0.05% is about $50 between the buy and sell price on $100,000, so check the live quote before you trade.

Commodity prices can swing sharply when oil or metals move, so spreads can widen on volatile days. Use limit orders for large trades and avoid the first and last minutes of the session. See creation, redemption and trading for how NAV, premiums and spreads arise.

PDBC vs COMT expense ratio and fees in dollars

As stated by each issuer
BalancePDBC (0.59%)COMT (0.48%)Gap per year
$10,000$59$48$11
$50,000$295$240$55
$100,000$590$480$110

Expense ratio is taken from fund assets, not billed. Net expense ratios are shown (PDBC: total 0.74% with 0.15% acquired fund fees; COMT: gross 0.49%, net 0.48% after a 0.01% waiver). Fees exclude the bid/ask spread, any premium or discount to NAV, brokerage commissions and taxes.

PDBC vs COMT, how each fund gets its commodity exposure

Index approach, in plain language

PDBC · DBIQ Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Index Excess Return (benchmark, actively managed)

PDBC tracks the DBIQ Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Index Excess Return (benchmark, actively managed). It holds futures on about 27 commodities and was launched in 2014; the ten largest commodities total 77.3% of futures exposure. Index rules and rebalance dates are in the fund’s prospectus.

COMT · S&P GSCI Dynamic Roll Index

COMT tracks the S&P GSCI Dynamic Roll Index. It holds futures on about 24 commodities and was launched in 2014; the ten largest commodities total 80.6% of futures exposure. Index rules and rebalance dates are in the fund’s prospectus.

Exact eligibility rules, caps and rebalance dates sit in each prospectus and index methodology; read them before relying on this summary.

PDBC vs COMT, why yield and returns differ

Sector mix explains much of the gap

The two funds follow different indexes. The DBIQ Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Index Excess Return (benchmark, actively managed) follows the same 27-commodity universe as DBC but is actively managed, so it can choose contracts and hold Treasury securities, swaps and notes for extra return. The S&P GSCI Dynamic Roll Index follows the S&P GSCI but chooses which contract month to hold using roll yield, so it holds the GSCI mix with a different roll rule.

PDBC follows the DBIQ Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Index Excess Return (benchmark, actively managed) and COMT uses the S&P GSCI Dynamic Roll Index. Because commodity funds hold futures, the return comes from three sources: the change in commodity prices, the roll yield or cost as contracts are replaced, and interest earned on the collateral. Differences in contract choice, roll timing and collateral income explain most of the gap between funds with similar baskets, and fees explain the rest.

How to decide between PDBC and COMT

A step-by-step framework

Start with what separates them: The two funds follow different indexes. The DBIQ Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Index Excess Return (benchmark, actively managed) follows the same 27-commodity universe as DBC but is actively managed, so it can choose contracts and hold Treasury securities, swaps and notes for extra return.

The S&P GSCI Dynamic Roll Index follows the S&P GSCI but chooses which contract month to hold using roll yield, so it holds the GSCI mix with a different roll rule. Then check what you already own: the funds overlap by 91.3%, so holding both adds little.

  • Step 1 · Structure: PDBC is actively managed and holds futures on the same 27 commodities as DBC, plus swaps, Treasury securities and other short-term holdings, through a Cayman subsidiary; COMT holds S&P GSCI futures chosen for the best roll yield, plus cash and short-term notes.
  • Step 2 · Cost: PDBC 0.59% vs COMT 0.48% net expense ratio.
  • Step 3 · Tax form: PDBC issues a 1099; COMT issues a 1099. This matters most for tax-advanced accounts and for Canadian investors.
  • Step 4 · Overlap: use the Diversification Calculator against what you own.

Size the position against your whole portfolio. Commodity funds are volatile and behave differently from stocks and bonds, so they usually play a small, deliberate role.

PDBC vs COMT for Canadian investors

Currency, withholding tax and account type

PDBC and COMT are U.S.-listed and trade in U.S. dollars, so buying them from a Canadian account usually involves converting Canadian dollars, which adds a cost on both entry and exit. A move in the U.S. dollar also changes your return in Canadian dollars.

Tax treatment depends on the structure. A fund that files a Schedule K-1 can create extra reporting for a Canadian holder and may not suit an RRSP or TFSA, while a fund that issues a 1099 is simpler. Confirm the rules for your account with a tax professional. This is general education, not tax advice.

Risks of PDBC and COMT

What can go wrong

Shared risks

  • Commodity prices can swing sharply: oil, metals and crops respond to supply shocks, weather, politics and demand, and a broad commodity fund can fall while stocks rise.
  • Futures funds can lose value when the market is in contango, because rolling into a more expensive contract costs money even if the spot price does not change.
  • Energy is 57% of PDBC and 56% of COMT, so oil and fuel prices drive a large share of the result.
  • Commodities produce no earnings or dividends of their own; returns come from price changes, roll yield and interest on collateral.

Fund-specific risks

  • PDBC: ten largest commodities total 77.3% of futures exposure (Oct 31, 2026); exposure to 27 commodities.
  • COMT: ten largest commodities total 80.6% of futures exposure (Nov 9, 2026); exposure to 24 commodities.
  • PDBC: is actively managed through a Cayman subsidiary and holds swaps, so it carries counterparty and management risk. COMT: follows the GSCI with a dynamic roll rule, and its roll choice can differ from the index in a given month.
  • Both: not registered as ordinary stock funds; see each prospectus for legal form and the risks of futures.

PDBC vs COMT taxes and account placement

General education, not tax advice

PDBC holds futures through a Cayman subsidiary and issues a standard 1099, but income from the subsidiary can be taxed as ordinary income. COMT is a regulated fund that issues a standard 1099 rather than a Schedule K-1, but income from its futures and cash holdings can be taxed as ordinary income. Issuer pages list after-tax returns only for some funds, and gaps are marked Not captured.

For Canadian account types and withholding tax, see the Canadian section above. Confirm the rules for your account with a tax professional, and read how to build an ETF portfolio.

Other ETFs people compare

For context, not recommendations

Investors comparing PDBC and COMT often also look at the other broad commodity funds in this group: DBC, PDBC, GSG, USCI, BCI and COMT. See the other commodity ETFs comparisons and the ETF research hub.

PDBC vs COMT drawdown arithmetic

What a decline means in dollars
−10%–
−20%–
−30% (illustrative, PDBC)–
−30% (illustrative, COMT)–

Recovery gain = decline ÷ (1 − decline). The scenarios use illustrative declines of 10%, 20% and 30% so you can see what a drop does to each fund. They are a rough guide to a bad year, not a worst-case figure. See the Position Size Calculator.

Tools to compare PDBC vs COMT

Static weights from this page
Cost of the fee gap · compounded difference
PDBC ending–
COMT ending–
Difference–

Ignores taxes, spreads and holdings differences. ETF Fee Calculator.

Where would your money land?
PDBC largest commodity (21.1%)–
PDBC top ten (77.3%)–
PDBC energy (56.7%)–
COMT largest commodity (19.1%)–
COMT top ten (80.6%)–
COMT energy (56.0%)–

Check shared exposure with the Diversification Calculator.

PDBC vs COMT, which fits which job

Characteristics, not recommendations

PDBC may suit investors who want…

Actively managed exposure to the same 27 commodities, with a 1099.

Strengths

  • Futures on 27 commodities
  • Flatter top ten: 77.3% against 80.6%
  • Exchange-traded and priced all day
  • Holdings dated on this page

Watch points

  • Higher fee: 0.59% against 0.48%
  • Not a complete portfolio
  • Futures roll costs

COMT may suit investors who want…

GSCI exposure with a roll-yield rule.

Strengths

  • Lower fee: 0.48% against 0.59%
  • Futures on 24 commodities
  • Exchange-traded and priced all day
  • Holdings dated on this page

Watch points

  • Heavier top ten: 80.6% against 77.3%
  • Not a complete portfolio
  • Futures roll costs
Neither is a complete portfolio. Both hold commodity futures only and leave out stocks, bonds and other assets. Start from a core portfolio and size a position inside your allocation. This is general education, not tax or investment advice.

PDBC vs COMT investor scenarios

Characteristics that fit, not recommendations
Lowest cost commodity exposureWants broad commodity futures at the lowest annual fee.PDBC 0.59% · COMT 0.48%
Wants a simple tax formPrefers a 1099 to a Schedule K-1 and does not want extra tax reporting.PDBC: 1099, COMT: 1099
Inflation hedgeAdds a small commodity position beside stocks and bonds to diversify inflation risk.Size it small
Canadian investorHolds U.S.-listed ETFs in USD and weighs tax forms and currency by account type.Confirm with a tax pro

PDBC vs COMT key terms

Plain-language definitions
Futures contractAn agreement to buy or sell a commodity at a set price on a future date. Commodity funds hold futures, not barrels or bars.Both funds
Roll yieldThe gain or cost when a fund replaces an expiring contract with a later one. It can add to or subtract from returns.Futures funds
ContangoWhen later contracts cost more than the near one, so rolling costs money.Roll cost
Schedule K-1A partnership tax form some commodity pools issue instead of a 1099.Neither fund
PDBC vs COMT at a glance: fees, commodity overlap, top commodities and returns for two commodity ETFs
PDBC vs COMT at a glance, reviewed November 9, 2026

PDBC vs COMT, frequently asked questions

Answers use the figures and dates shown above

Is PDBC or COMT better?

In the PDBC vs COMT question, neither is better for everyone. PDBC and COMT differ in what they hold and what they charge. The two funds follow different indexes. The DBIQ Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Index Excess Return (benchmark, actively managed) follows the same 27-commodity universe as DBC but is actively managed, so it can choose contracts and hold Treasury securities, swaps and notes for extra return.

The S&P GSCI Dynamic Roll Index follows the S&P GSCI but chooses which contract month to hold using roll yield, so it holds the GSCI mix with a different roll rule. Expense ratios are 0.59% and 0.48%. NAV total returns, annualized (PDBC to Oct 31, 2026, COMT to Sep 30, 2026): 1 year 53.50% vs 48.38%; 3 years 15.74% vs 14.56%; 5 years 12.45% vs 13.55%; 10 years 10.00% vs 9.63%. Neither is better for everyone; the choice turns on cost, tax form (K-1 or 1099), and what you already own.

PDBC vs COMT, what are the expense ratios?

PDBC charges 0.59% and COMT charges 0.48%, which is $59 and $48 a year per $10,000.

PDBC vs COMT, how much do the funds overlap?

About 91.3% of the exposure is held by both funds, matched by commodity in issuer holdings dated Oct 31, 2026 and Nov 9, 2026. 9 commodities appear in both top-ten lists.

PDBC vs COMT, what does each ETF track?

PDBC tracks the DBIQ Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Index Excess Return (benchmark, actively managed). COMT tracks the S&P GSCI Dynamic Roll Index.

PDBC vs COMT, what are the top commodities?

PDBC (Oct 31, 2026): Brent crude 21.12%, WTI crude 17.38%, Gold 8.02%, Gasoil 6.63%, Heating oil 5.67%. COMT (Nov 9, 2026): Brent crude 19.07%, WTI crude 18.07%, Gold 7.92%, Gasoil 7.9%, Copper 6.47%.

PDBC vs COMT, which has performed better?

NAV total returns, annualized (PDBC to Oct 31, 2026, COMT to Sep 30, 2026): 1 year 53.50% vs 48.38%; 3 years 15.74% vs 14.56%; 5 years 12.45% vs 13.55%; 10 years 10.00% vs 9.63%. Returns depend on commodity prices, roll yield and collateral income, and past performance does not guarantee future results.

PDBC vs COMT, can I own both?

On PDBC vs COMT, you can, but they overlap by about 91.3%. 9 top-ten commodities are shared. Holding both adds almost no diversification: you are paying for two wrappers around nearly the same basket of commodities.

PDBC vs COMT, how often do the funds pay dividends?

Distribution frequency: PDBC annual, COMT annual. Distribution rates are 2.90% for PDBC and 1.61% for COMT; check each issuer page for the schedule.

PDBC vs COMT, are they suitable for Canadian investors?

On PDBC vs COMT, both are U.S.-listed and trade in U.S. dollars, so Canadians face currency conversion costs. PDBC issues a 1099 and COMT issues a 1099, which can change reporting. Treatment differs across TFSA, RRSP and taxable accounts. This is general education, not tax advice.

PDBC vs COMT, how do the funds differ by sector?

PDBC (Oct 31, 2026): energy 56.7%, agriculture 16.0%, industrial metals 10.8%. COMT (Nov 9, 2026): energy 56.0%, agriculture 14.0%, industrial metals 12.7%.

PDBC vs COMT documents and sources

Open the issuer documents before relying on any figure

PDBC · Invesco

COMT · BlackRock (iShares)

Third-party sources

Invesco PDBC fund page · iShares COMT fund page.

Methodology and limits

  • PDBC figures come from Invesco fund pages and COMT figures from BlackRock (iShares) fund pages.
  • Dates are shown beside each figure; the issuer documents are linked below.
  • Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of each commodity held by both funds. Treasury bills, cash and swaps used as collateral are excluded, and the dates and bases differ, so treat the overlap as an estimate. Weights are shares of each fund’s futures exposure by underlying commodity, so Treasury bills, cash and collateral are excluded. PDBC weights are the prior month-end commodity exposure published by Invesco (Oct 31, 2026). COMT weights are each commodity’s share of futures notional value in the iShares holdings file of Nov 9, 2026. Invesco groups livestock with agriculture in its PDBC sector chart; this page shows it separately.
  • This page shows livestock as its own group for every fund.
  • Figures that were unavailable (beta, standard deviation, 52-week range, calendar-year returns) are left as Not captured, and nothing was filled from memory or from another fund.
  • Growth of $10,000 is derived from annualized NAV total returns on matched dates; dollar values are approximate.
  • Returns are issuer-reported NAV total returns (dates shown beside each figure), with market price and benchmark figures where published.

Educational research, not personalized investment, tax or legal advice, and not a recommendation to buy or sell any fund. Investing involves risk, including loss of principal. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Calculators are hypothetical illustrations. Fund data are provided as published by the sources named and may differ from current figures.