DBC vs GSG ETF comparison

INVEST & COMPOUND · ETF RESEARCHCommodity ETFs · Comparison · Reviewed November 9, 2026
Invest & Compound · ETF ResearchData: Issuer fund pages, Sep 30 to Nov 9, 2026

DBC vs GSG

Different tickers, much the same exposure

DBC holds futures contracts on 27 commodities in the DBIQ Optimum Yield index and fills the rest of the fund with Treasury bills and cash, and GSG holds one S&P GSCI futures contract plus Treasury bills. The two funds follow different indexes. The DBIQ Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Index Excess Return buys futures on 27 commodities and rolls them toward the contract month with the best expected roll yield, tracking the excess return version of the index.

The S&P GSCI Total Return Index weights commodities by world production, so oil and gas make up well over half of the fund. DBC charges 0.82% and GSG charges 0.75%. This page lines up what each fund holds by commodity, how much they overlap, what each paid and how each performed, with the date next to every number.

DBCInvesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund
Energy52.9%Agriculture16.9%Industrial metals11.8%Precious metals11.7%Livestock6.7%
HoldsFutures on 27 commodities
Ten largest commodities75.6%
Expense ratio0.82%
Net assets$1.77B
PaysAnnual
Launched2006
GSGiShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust
Energy51.8%Agriculture17.0%Industrial metals12.1%Livestock11.2%Precious metals7.9%
HoldsFutures on 24 commodities
Ten largest commodities75.4%
Expense ratio0.75%
Net assets$961.7M
PaysNot captured
Launched2006
!
DBC and GSG each have exposure to 27 commodities. 87.6% of the weight is shared by commodity in the fund holdings (Nov 9, 2026 and Jan 2026 index weights).
0.07%Expense ratio gap: DBC 0.82%, GSG 0.75%
87.6%Overlap by commodity (issuer holdings, Nov 9, 2026 and Jan 2026 index weights)
75.6% / 75.4%Ten largest commodities, DBC / GSG
n/aReturn dates differ, so no leader is named
DBC: Invesco fund pages (see Documents and sources). GSG: BlackRock (iShares) fund pages (see Documents and sources). Educational, not advice.
Quick answerUpdated November 9, 2026

DBC vs GSG, the short answer

DBC and GSG differ in what they hold and what they charge. The two funds follow different indexes. The DBIQ Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Index Excess Return buys futures on 27 commodities and rolls them toward the contract month with the best expected roll yield, tracking the excess return version of the index.

The S&P GSCI Total Return Index weights commodities by world production, so oil and gas make up well over half of the fund. Expense ratios are 0.82% and 0.75%. NAV total returns, annualized (DBC to Oct 31, 2026, GSG to Sep 30, 2026): 1 year 52.50% vs 55.21%; 3 years 16.35% vs 16.40%; 5 years 12.67% vs 16.09%; 10 years 10.32% vs 9.16%. Neither is better for everyone; the choice turns on cost, tax form (K-1 or 1099), and what you already own.

CostGSG costs less: 0.75% vs 0.82%$82 a year per $10,000 vs $75
Holdings27 commodities eachTen largest 75.6% vs 75.4%
Overlap87.6% of the exposure is sharedby commodity, issuer holdings, Nov 9, 2026 and Jan 2026 index weights
Track recordDates differ, so no leader is named.1 year 52.50% vs 55.21% (1 year)
Figures from the issuer pages named in the data room, with dates. Educational, not advice.
OverlapTop-ten lists · weights as of the dates shown

DBC vs GSG overlap, if you own both

87.6%of the exposure shared by commodity (Nov 9, 2026 and Jan 2026 index weights) · 8 shared top-ten commodities

DBC · ten largest holdings

As of Nov 9, 2026
  1. 1Brent crude CO18.93%Both
  2. 2WTI crude CL16.00%Both
  3. 3Gold GC9.22%Both
  4. 4Gasoil QS6.55%Both
  5. 5Copper HG5.71%Both
  6. 6Heating oil HO5.61%Both
  7. 7Gasoline XB3.65%Only here
  8. 8Soybeans S3.39%Only here
  9. 9Aluminum LA3.26%Both
  10. 10Live cattle LC3.25%Both

Ten largest total 75.6%

GSG · ten largest holdings

As of Jan 2026 index weights
  1. 1Brent crude CO18.23%Both
  2. 2WTI crude CL17.79%Both
  3. 3Gold GC7.24%Both
  4. 4Copper HG5.47%Both
  5. 5Gasoil QS5.22%Both
  6. 6Live cattle LC5.20%Both
  7. 7Corn C4.67%Only here
  8. 8Aluminum LA4.28%Both
  9. 9Heating oil HO3.69%Both
  10. 10Natural gas NG3.57%Only here

Ten largest total 75.4%

Shared by both · 8 commodities

CommodityDBC weightGSG weightGap
Brent crude CO18.93%18.23%+0.70 pts
WTI crude CL16.00%17.79%-1.79 pts
Gold GC9.22%7.24%+1.98 pts
Gasoil QS6.55%5.22%+1.33 pts
Copper HG5.71%5.47%+0.24 pts
Heating oil HO5.61%3.69%+1.92 pts
Aluminum LA3.26%4.28%-1.02 pts
Live cattle LC3.25%5.20%-1.95 pts

Only in DBC’s top ten: Gasoline, Soybeans. Only in GSG’s top ten: Corn, Natural gas.

In DBC’s top ten
In GSG’s top ten
87.6%
of the exposure shared by commodity (Nov 9, 2026 and Jan 2026 index weights) · 8 shared top-ten commodities
Biggest sector gaps: livestock is 6.7% of DBC but 11.2% of GSG; precious metals is 11.7% of DBC but 7.9% of GSG

The twist

Overlap (commodity)
87.6%
Sector overlap (this page)
95.1%
Top-ten weight, DBC
75.6%
Top-ten weight, GSG
75.4%

87.6% of the exposure sits in commodities both funds hold (matched by commodity, issuer holdings dated Nov 9, 2026 and Jan 2026 index weights), and 8 commodities appear in both top-ten lists. Holding both adds almost no diversification: you are paying for two wrappers around nearly the same basket of commodities.

Top-ten lists: DBC Nov 9, 2026, GSG Jan 2026 index weights. Sector tables: DBC Nov 9, 2026, GSG Jan 2026 index weights. Overlap: sum of the smaller weight of each commodity held by both funds, using each issuer’s published holdings or exposure (Nov 9, 2026 and Jan 2026 index weights); the dates differ for some pairs, so treat it as an estimate. Weights are shares of each fund’s futures exposure by underlying commodity, so Treasury bills, cash and collateral are excluded. DBC weights are computed from the Nov 9, 2026 futures holdings by adding contracts on the same commodity and dividing by total futures exposure. GSG holds a single S&P GSCI future, so iShares publishes no commodity weights; the weights used are the S&P GSCI reference weights for 2026 published by S&P Dow Jones Indices (effective Jan 8, 2026). Not advice.
GoalsCharacteristics, not recommendations

DBC vs GSG, one goal, which fund?

FundYour goalWhyThe evidence
GSGLower costLower expense ratioGSG 0.75% vs DBC 0.82% ($75 vs $82 a year per $10,000)
DBCBroader coverageMore commoditiesDBC covers 27 commodities; GSG covers 24
GSGA flatter top tenLess weight in the largest commoditiesTen largest: DBC 75.6% vs GSG 75.4% (Nov 9, 2026 vs Jan 2026 index weights dates)
NEITHERCommodity exposureBoth hold commodity futuresBoth hold futures on oil, metals and farm products and both rise and fall with commodity prices
Fund figures from the issuers named in the data room. Examples, not recommendations.
HoldingsFive largest · full top-ten tables in the data room

DBC vs GSG, where the money goes

DBC · Invesco, Nov 9, 2026

GSG · BlackRock (iShares), Jan 2026 index weights

Concentration: DBC ten largest commodities total 75.6% and GSG total 75.4%.
Top ten as listed by each issuer on the dates shown. Weights move with prices. Not advice.
ReturnsAnnualized total returns, matched dates

DBC vs GSG returns compared over 1, 3, 5 and 10 years

+52.50%DBC 1-year NAV total return to Oct 31, 2026
+55.21%GSG 1-year total return to Sep 30, 2026
10.32% vs 9.16%10 years annualized NAV total return, DBC vs GSG (DBC to Oct 31, 2026, GSG to Sep 30, 2026)
1 year 52.50% vs 55.21%; 3 years 16.35% vs 16.40%; 5 years 12.67% vs 16.09%; 10 years 10.32% vs 9.16%. Return dates differ between the two funds, so compare the table with care.
Return dates are not matched (DBC to Oct 31, 2026, GSG to Sep 30, 2026). No leader is named. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
FeesAs stated by each issuer

DBC vs GSG, what each fund costs a year

$82DBC, per $10,000 · 0.82%
$75GSG, per $10,000 · 0.75%
The fees are 0.82% and 0.75%, so the calculator below shows a difference of $7.00 a year per $10,000.
DBC net expense ratio 0.82% (issuer; total 0.89% before a 0.07% waiver). GSG net expense ratio 0.75% (issuer; sponsor fee 0.75%). Illustrative arithmetic, not a forecast.

The data room

Every figure behind the DBC vs GSG cards above, with its source, date and evidence grade. Open the issuer documents before relying on any number.

DBC vs GSG key facts

Evidence grade: Issuer issuer page · Mixed issuer plus provider · 3rd party
MetricDBCGSGGrade and source

Portfolio characteristics

MetricDBCGSGGrade and source

Net assets are dated Nov 9, 2026 for both funds (DBC $1.77B; GSG $961.7M). Figures that the issuers do not publish, such as beta, standard deviation and 52-week range, are left as Not captured rather than estimated.

DBC vs GSG holdings and top ten

Click a commodity tile · DBC: Invesco, Nov 9, 2026 · GSG: BlackRock (iShares), Jan 2026 index weights
EnergyAgriculturePrecious metalsIndustrial metalsLivestock
Select a tile
Tile area is proportional to weight.
DBC
#CommodityWeight
GSG
#CommodityWeight

Top ten sums: DBC 75.6% · GSG 75.4%. 8 shared top-ten commodities. Weights change.

DBC vs GSG sector exposure

DBC: Nov 9, 2026 · GSG: Jan 2026 index weights
DBC
GSG
Implication. DBC is led by energy 52.9%, agriculture 16.9%, industrial metals 11.8%. GSG is led by energy 51.8%, agriculture 17.0%, industrial metals 12.1%. Livestock is shown as its own group here.

The sector mirror

DBCGSG
Implication. Sector gaps: energy is 52.9% of DBC and 51.8% of GSG; agriculture is 16.9% and 17.0%; precious metals 11.7% and 7.9% (Nov 9, 2026 vs Jan 2026 index weights). Weights are shares of futures exposure, excluding collateral.

Same funds, different lenses

Implication. Energy, farm products, industrial metals, precious metals and livestock are the five groups used for every commodity fund on this site, so the funds compare on the same labels.

Contracts and collateral

Both funds hold futures contracts, not physical commodities. DBC lists 27 commodities and GSG lists 24. Each contract expires and is replaced (rolled) before it ends, and the cash backing the contracts sits in Treasury bills, money market funds and similar holdings. That collateral earns interest and is not counted in the commodity weights here.

What you actually own

IndexDBC tracks the DBIQ Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Index Excess Return. GSG uses the S&P GSCI Total Return Index as its benchmark.DBC · GSG
CommoditiesDBC and GSG each hold exposure to 27 commodities across energy, farm products and metals.Top ten 75.6% vs 75.4%
StructureBoth hold futures, collateral and cash rather than physical commodities. DBC issues a Schedule K-1 and GSG issues a Schedule K-1.See prospectuses
ManagementDBC follows its index rules. GSG follows its index rules.Passive vs active

DBC vs GSG performance

Matched dates, DBC to Oct 31, 2026, GSG to Sep 30, 2026; issuer NAV rows dated separately

Return rows come from the issuer pages and are dated Oct 31, 2026 for DBC and Sep 30, 2026 for GSG, so they are not matched and no return leader is named. NAV returns include fees; market price and benchmark returns are shown beside them where the issuer published them, and gaps are marked Not captured. “Since inception” starts in different years (DBC 2006, GSG 2006). Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Latest returns. Year to date (NAV total return, issuer, dates differ): DBC +50.76% (Jan 1 to Oct 31, 2026), GSG +49.65% (to Nov 6, 2026).

Growth of a hypothetical $10,000 · NAV total return, DBC to Oct 31, 2026, GSG to Sep 30, 2026

Both funds derived from issuer NAV total returns on matched dates (compounded). Distributions reinvested; fund expenses are already in NAV. Illustration, not a forecast.

DBC vs GSG yield, dividends and dividend growth

Yield and distribution facts
Yield definitions
MeasureDBCGSG
30-day SEC yieldNot reportedNot reported
Trailing 12-month2.36% 12-month distribution rate (Nov 6, 2026)Not captured
Paid, last 12 months$0.744 per shareNot captured
FrequencyAnnualNot captured

Distribution frequency: DBC annual, GSG not captured. Per-share payouts differ because share prices differ, so compare yields rather than dollars. Payouts depend on Treasury interest earned on collateral and on how each fund is structured, and some payouts are classed as return of capital. Payouts captured: DBC 2, GSG 0; gaps are marked Not captured. See what is dividend yield and yield vs total return.

DBC vs GSG concentration and overlap

Ten largest positions · shared holdings
8Shared top-ten commodities
87.6%Overlap · by commodity
56.4% / 54.0%Top five, DBC / GSG
18.9%Largest single commodity

Rank by rank, the ten largest commodities of each fund, as a share of futures exposure. Top five: DBC 56.4%, GSG 54.0%. Top ten: DBC 75.6%, GSG 75.4%.

Implication. The lists share 8 commodities, so owning both repeats some of the same bets. Largest commodity: DBC Brent crude (18.93%), GSG Brent crude (18.23%).

DBC vs GSG trading and liquidity

Issuer fund pages · Nov 9, 2026
$1.77B / $961.7MNet assets, DBC / GSG (Nov 9, 2026)
57.05M / Not capturedShares outstanding, DBC / GSG
0.03% / 0.03%Median bid/ask spread, DBC / GSG
NYSE Arca / NYSE ArcaExchange listing, DBC / GSG

The issuers report bid/ask spreads of 0.03% for DBC and 0.03% for GSG (measures differ by issuer; see each fund page). A spread of 0.05% is about $50 between the buy and sell price on $100,000, so check the live quote before you trade.

Commodity prices can swing sharply when oil or metals move, so spreads can widen on volatile days. Use limit orders for large trades and avoid the first and last minutes of the session. See creation, redemption and trading for how NAV, premiums and spreads arise.

DBC vs GSG expense ratio and fees in dollars

As stated by each issuer
BalanceDBC (0.82%)GSG (0.75%)Gap per year
$10,000$82$75$7
$50,000$410$375$35
$100,000$820$750$70

Expense ratio is taken from fund assets, not billed. Net expense ratios are shown (DBC: total 0.89% before a 0.07% waiver; GSG: sponsor fee 0.75%). Fees exclude the bid/ask spread, any premium or discount to NAV, brokerage commissions and taxes.

DBC vs GSG, how each fund gets its commodity exposure

Index approach, in plain language

DBC · DBIQ Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Index Excess Return

DBC tracks the DBIQ Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Index Excess Return. It holds futures on about 27 commodities and was launched in 2006; the ten largest commodities total 75.6% of futures exposure. Index rules and rebalance dates are in the fund’s prospectus.

GSG · S&P GSCI Total Return Index

GSG tracks the S&P GSCI Total Return Index. It holds futures on about 24 commodities and was launched in 2006; the ten largest commodities total 75.4% of futures exposure. Index rules and rebalance dates are in the fund’s prospectus.

Exact eligibility rules, caps and rebalance dates sit in each prospectus and index methodology; read them before relying on this summary.

DBC vs GSG, why yield and returns differ

Sector mix explains much of the gap

The two funds follow different indexes. The DBIQ Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Index Excess Return buys futures on 27 commodities and rolls them toward the contract month with the best expected roll yield, tracking the excess return version of the index. The S&P GSCI Total Return Index weights commodities by world production, so oil and gas make up well over half of the fund.

DBC follows the DBIQ Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Index Excess Return and GSG uses the S&P GSCI Total Return Index. Because commodity funds hold futures, the return comes from three sources: the change in commodity prices, the roll yield or cost as contracts are replaced, and interest earned on the collateral. Differences in contract choice, roll timing and collateral income explain most of the gap between funds with similar baskets, and fees explain the rest.

How to decide between DBC and GSG

A step-by-step framework

Start with what separates them: The two funds follow different indexes. The DBIQ Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Index Excess Return buys futures on 27 commodities and rolls them toward the contract month with the best expected roll yield, tracking the excess return version of the index. The S&P GSCI Total Return Index weights commodities by world production, so oil and gas make up well over half of the fund. Then check what you already own: the funds overlap by 87.6%, so holding both adds little.

  • Step 1 · Structure: DBC holds futures contracts on 27 commodities in the DBIQ Optimum Yield index and fills the rest of the fund with Treasury bills and cash; GSG holds one S&P GSCI futures contract plus Treasury bills.
  • Step 2 · Cost: DBC 0.82% vs GSG 0.75% net expense ratio.
  • Step 3 · Tax form: DBC issues a Schedule K-1; GSG issues a Schedule K-1. This matters most for tax-advanced accounts and for Canadian investors.
  • Step 4 · Overlap: use the Diversification Calculator against what you own.

Size the position against your whole portfolio. Commodity funds are volatile and behave differently from stocks and bonds, so they usually play a small, deliberate role.

DBC vs GSG for Canadian investors

Currency, withholding tax and account type

DBC and GSG are U.S.-listed and trade in U.S. dollars, so buying them from a Canadian account usually involves converting Canadian dollars, which adds a cost on both entry and exit. A move in the U.S. dollar also changes your return in Canadian dollars.

Tax treatment depends on the structure. A fund that files a Schedule K-1 can create extra reporting for a Canadian holder and may not suit an RRSP or TFSA, while a fund that issues a 1099 is simpler. Confirm the rules for your account with a tax professional. This is general education, not tax advice.

Risks of DBC and GSG

What can go wrong

Shared risks

  • Commodity prices can swing sharply: oil, metals and crops respond to supply shocks, weather, politics and demand, and a broad commodity fund can fall while stocks rise.
  • Futures funds can lose value when the market is in contango, because rolling into a more expensive contract costs money even if the spot price does not change.
  • Energy is 53% of DBC and 52% of GSG, so oil and fuel prices drive a large share of the result.
  • Commodities produce no earnings or dividends of their own; returns come from price changes, roll yield and interest on collateral.

Fund-specific risks

  • DBC: ten largest commodities total 75.6% of futures exposure (Nov 9, 2026); exposure to 27 commodities.
  • GSG: ten largest commodities total 75.4% of futures exposure (Jan 2026 index weights); exposure to 24 commodities.
  • DBC: files a Schedule K-1 and its Dec 2025 payout was reported as return of capital. GSG: holds one GSCI future plus Treasury bills, so its result follows a single index, and it files a Schedule K-1.
  • Both: not registered as ordinary stock funds; see each prospectus for legal form and the risks of futures.

DBC vs GSG taxes and account placement

General education, not tax advice

DBC is a commodity pool that issues a Schedule K-1 each year, and futures gains in a K-1 fund are generally taxed under the 60/40 rule, with 60% treated as long-term and 40% as short-term regardless of how long you hold. GSG is a commodity pool structured as a trust and issues a Schedule K-1, and futures gains are generally taxed under the 60/40 rule. Issuer pages list after-tax returns only for some funds, and gaps are marked Not captured.

For Canadian account types and withholding tax, see the Canadian section above. Confirm the rules for your account with a tax professional, and read how to build an ETF portfolio.

Other ETFs people compare

For context, not recommendations

Investors comparing DBC and GSG often also look at the other broad commodity funds in this group: DBC, PDBC, GSG, USCI, BCI and COMT. See the other commodity ETFs comparisons and the ETF research hub.

DBC vs GSG drawdown arithmetic

What a decline means in dollars
−10%–
−20%–
−30% (illustrative, DBC)–
−30% (illustrative, GSG)–

Recovery gain = decline ÷ (1 − decline). The scenarios use illustrative declines of 10%, 20% and 30% so you can see what a drop does to each fund. They are a rough guide to a bad year, not a worst-case figure. See the Position Size Calculator.

Tools to compare DBC vs GSG

Static weights from this page
Cost of the fee gap · compounded difference
DBC ending–
GSG ending–
Difference–

Ignores taxes, spreads and holdings differences. ETF Fee Calculator.

Where would your money land?
DBC largest commodity (18.9%)–
DBC top ten (75.6%)–
DBC energy (52.9%)–
GSG largest commodity (18.2%)–
GSG top ten (75.4%)–
GSG energy (51.8%)–

Check shared exposure with the Diversification Calculator.

DBC vs GSG, which fits which job

Characteristics, not recommendations

DBC may suit investors who want…

Passive exposure to 27 commodity futures, with a Schedule K-1.

Strengths

  • Futures on 27 commodities
  • Exchange-traded and priced all day
  • Holdings dated on this page

Watch points

  • Higher fee: 0.82% against 0.75%
  • Heavier top ten: 75.6% against 75.4%
  • Not a complete portfolio
  • Futures roll costs

GSG may suit investors who want…

Production-weighted commodity exposure, heavy in oil and gas.

Strengths

  • Lower fee: 0.75% against 0.82%
  • Futures on 24 commodities
  • Flatter top ten: 75.4% against 75.6%
  • Exchange-traded and priced all day

Watch points

  • Not a complete portfolio
  • Futures roll costs
Neither is a complete portfolio. Both hold commodity futures only and leave out stocks, bonds and other assets. Start from a core portfolio and size a position inside your allocation. This is general education, not tax or investment advice.

DBC vs GSG investor scenarios

Characteristics that fit, not recommendations
Lowest cost commodity exposureWants broad commodity futures at the lowest annual fee.DBC 0.82% · GSG 0.75%
Wants a simple tax formPrefers a 1099 to a Schedule K-1 and does not want extra tax reporting.DBC: Schedule K-1, GSG: Schedule K-1
Inflation hedgeAdds a small commodity position beside stocks and bonds to diversify inflation risk.Size it small
Canadian investorHolds U.S.-listed ETFs in USD and weighs tax forms and currency by account type.Confirm with a tax pro

DBC vs GSG key terms

Plain-language definitions
Futures contractAn agreement to buy or sell a commodity at a set price on a future date. Commodity funds hold futures, not barrels or bars.Both funds
Roll yieldThe gain or cost when a fund replaces an expiring contract with a later one. It can add to or subtract from returns.Futures funds
ContangoWhen later contracts cost more than the near one, so rolling costs money.Roll cost
Schedule K-1A partnership tax form some commodity pools issue instead of a 1099.DBC, GSG
DBC vs GSG at a glance: fees, commodity overlap, top commodities and returns for two commodity ETFs
DBC vs GSG at a glance, reviewed November 9, 2026

DBC vs GSG, frequently asked questions

Answers use the figures and dates shown above

Is DBC or GSG better?

In the DBC vs GSG question, neither is better for everyone. DBC and GSG differ in what they hold and what they charge. The two funds follow different indexes. The DBIQ Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Index Excess Return buys futures on 27 commodities and rolls them toward the contract month with the best expected roll yield, tracking the excess return version of the index.

The S&P GSCI Total Return Index weights commodities by world production, so oil and gas make up well over half of the fund. Expense ratios are 0.82% and 0.75%. NAV total returns, annualized (DBC to Oct 31, 2026, GSG to Sep 30, 2026): 1 year 52.50% vs 55.21%; 3 years 16.35% vs 16.40%; 5 years 12.67% vs 16.09%; 10 years 10.32% vs 9.16%. Neither is better for everyone; the choice turns on cost, tax form (K-1 or 1099), and what you already own.

DBC vs GSG, what are the expense ratios?

DBC charges 0.82% and GSG charges 0.75%, which is $82 and $75 a year per $10,000.

DBC vs GSG, how much do the funds overlap?

About 87.6% of the exposure is held by both funds, matched by commodity in issuer holdings dated Nov 9, 2026 and Jan 2026 index weights. 8 commodities appear in both top-ten lists.

DBC vs GSG, what does each ETF track?

DBC tracks the DBIQ Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Index Excess Return. GSG tracks the S&P GSCI Total Return Index.

DBC vs GSG, what are the top commodities?

DBC (Nov 9, 2026): Brent crude 18.93%, WTI crude 16.0%, Gold 9.22%, Gasoil 6.55%, Copper 5.71%. GSG (Jan 2026 index weights): Brent crude 18.23%, WTI crude 17.79%, Gold 7.24%, Copper 5.47%, Gasoil 5.22%.

DBC vs GSG, which has performed better?

NAV total returns, annualized (DBC to Oct 31, 2026, GSG to Sep 30, 2026): 1 year 52.50% vs 55.21%; 3 years 16.35% vs 16.40%; 5 years 12.67% vs 16.09%; 10 years 10.32% vs 9.16%. Returns depend on commodity prices, roll yield and collateral income, and past performance does not guarantee future results.

DBC vs GSG, can I own both?

On DBC vs GSG, you can, but they overlap by about 87.6%. 8 top-ten commodities are shared. Holding both adds almost no diversification: you are paying for two wrappers around nearly the same basket of commodities.

DBC vs GSG, how often do the funds pay dividends?

Distribution frequency: DBC annual, GSG not captured. Distribution rates are 2.36% 12-month distribution rate trailing for DBC and not captured for GSG; check each issuer page for the schedule.

DBC vs GSG, are they suitable for Canadian investors?

On DBC vs GSG, both are U.S.-listed and trade in U.S. dollars, so Canadians face currency conversion costs. DBC issues a Schedule K-1 and GSG issues a Schedule K-1, which can change reporting. Treatment differs across TFSA, RRSP and taxable accounts. This is general education, not tax advice.

DBC vs GSG, how do the funds differ by sector?

DBC (Nov 9, 2026): energy 52.9%, agriculture 16.9%, industrial metals 11.8%. GSG (Jan 2026 index weights): energy 51.8%, agriculture 17.0%, industrial metals 12.1%.

DBC vs GSG documents and sources

Open the issuer documents before relying on any figure

DBC · Invesco

GSG · BlackRock (iShares)

Third-party sources

Invesco DBC fund page · iShares GSG fund page.

Methodology and limits

  • DBC figures come from Invesco fund pages and GSG figures from BlackRock (iShares) fund pages.
  • Dates are shown beside each figure; the issuer documents are linked below.
  • Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of each commodity held by both funds. Treasury bills, cash and swaps used as collateral are excluded, and the dates and bases differ, so treat the overlap as an estimate. Weights are shares of each fund’s futures exposure by underlying commodity, so Treasury bills, cash and collateral are excluded. DBC weights are computed from the Nov 9, 2026 futures holdings by adding contracts on the same commodity and dividing by total futures exposure. GSG holds a single S&P GSCI future, so iShares publishes no commodity weights; the weights used are the S&P GSCI reference weights for 2026 published by S&P Dow Jones Indices (effective Jan 8, 2026).
  • This page shows livestock as its own group for every fund.
  • Figures that were unavailable (beta, standard deviation, 52-week range, calendar-year returns) are left as Not captured, and nothing was filled from memory or from another fund.
  • Growth of $10,000 is derived from annualized NAV total returns on matched dates; dollar values are approximate.
  • Returns are issuer-reported NAV total returns (dates shown beside each figure), with market price and benchmark figures where published.

Educational research, not personalized investment, tax or legal advice, and not a recommendation to buy or sell any fund. Investing involves risk, including loss of principal. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Calculators are hypothetical illustrations. Fund data are provided as published by the sources named and may differ from current figures.